<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>Meddelande</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3636" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=453132500-24112009><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>no of
them</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=453132500-24112009><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>or how
do you meen</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=sv dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----<BR><B>Från:</B>
blinux-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:blinux-list-bounces@redhat.com] <B>För
</B>Robert Jaquiss<BR><B>Skickat:</B> den 24 november 2009
00:40<BR><B>Till:</B> Linux for blind general discussion<BR><B>Ämne:</B>
Accessibility of grub or lilo<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hello:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> I will soon be taking a
course that will require me to use a dual boot system. We will be running
Redhat and Windows XP. My question is which dual boot loader is more
accessible grub or lilo? Thank you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Robert Jaquiss</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>