[Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/3] gfs2_edit: Ensure all leaf blocks in per_node are saved
Andrew Price
anprice at redhat.com
Thu Jun 5 10:39:25 UTC 2014
On 05/06/14 10:39, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/06/14 02:28, Andrew Price wrote:
>> block_is_in_per_node() only checks the first leaf block when the
>> per_node directory has been split (when the block size is small and/or
>> the number of journals is large). This caused savemeta to treat the
>> files in per_node as user data and so didn't save their metadata. Add an
>> outer loop to iterate over the indirect blocks.
> Why does it matter whether the block in the per_node subdir or not? Are
> we doing something special compared with other directories?
Yes, sorry I didn't make it very clear in the commit log: gfs2_edit
savemeta saves less metadata when a block isn't part of a set of
"system" structures to avoid saving user data while gathering enough
metadata to aid debugging.
static int block_is_systemfile(void)
{
return block_is_jindex() || block_is_inum_file() ||
block_is_statfs_file() || block_is_quota_file() ||
block_is_rindex() || block_is_a_journal() ||
block_is_per_node() || block_is_in_per_node();
}
save_inode_data() uses this function to decide the height at which to
stop saving metadata.
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/gfs2-utils.git/tree/gfs2/edit/savemeta.c#n499
Andy
>
> Steve.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Price <anprice at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> gfs2/edit/savemeta.c | 11 +++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gfs2/edit/savemeta.c b/gfs2/edit/savemeta.c
>> index a43045f..360b144 100644
>> --- a/gfs2/edit/savemeta.c
>> +++ b/gfs2/edit/savemeta.c
>> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int block_is_a_journal(void)
>> static int block_is_in_per_node(void)
>> {
>> - int d;
>> + int i;
>> struct gfs2_inode *per_node_di;
>> if (sbd.gfs1)
>> @@ -90,9 +90,12 @@ static int block_is_in_per_node(void)
>> do_dinode_extended(&per_node_di->i_di, per_node_di->i_bh);
>> inode_put(&per_node_di);
>> - for (d = 0; d < indirect->ii[0].dirents; d++) {
>> - if (block == indirect->ii[0].dirent[d].block)
>> - return TRUE;
>> + for (i = 0; i < indirect_blocks; i++) {
>> + int d;
>> + for (d = 0; d < indirect->ii[i].dirents; d++) {
>> + if (block == indirect->ii[i].dirent[d].block)
>> + return TRUE;
>> + }
>> }
>> return FALSE;
>> }
>
More information about the Cluster-devel
mailing list