<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Pete Muir <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com" target="_blank">pmuir@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Do we have any recommendations for how to run the CDK in a VDI<br>
(<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desktop_virtualization#Virtual_desktop_infrastructure" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desktop_virtualization#Virtual_desktop_infrastructure</a>)<br>
set up - where thousands of developers connect to servers and run<br>
virtual desktops. In particular, I'm thinking about the nested<br>
virtualization performance hit.<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
<br></blockquote><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Honestly, my recommendation for this use case would be not to use the CDK at all. Rather, deploy a quota limited openshift dev cluster with self-provisioning enabled. The goal for these orgs is managed, efficient, centralized environments so a container cluster fits into this quite well.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">If we have CDK features that do not meet the requirements maybe these can run as services in the cluster. Don't know. Just putting it out there.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">​</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
_______________________________________________<br>
Container-tools mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Container-tools@redhat.com">Container-tools@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>