[Crash-utility] Re: [RFC] Provide minimal debugging to crash
Sharyathi Nagesh
sharyath at in.ibm.com
Mon Aug 18 07:00:25 UTC 2008
Dave
I have done the suggested modifications, have a look
>
> I haven't walked through all the restricted command list code paths to
> verify that they can work properly for all architectures without, say,
> kernel_init(), the 3 machdep_init() calls, vm_init() etc. having run.
> Certainly trying to rd or dis vmalloc addresses would display garbage
> data or just fail, but that's to be expected.
>
> I quickly tried this on a x86 and x86_64 -- but have you tried this on
> an ia64 or ppc64?
I tested on ppc64 and on corrupted dump and it worked fine
>
> The only thing I'm not excited about is all the re-tinkering with the
> help screen output. Why bother? I'd prefer to keep things simple.
> During initialization, display a WARNING message that lists the supported
> commands just prior to the first prompt. And then just leave the help
> screen alone, and let your command-restriction mechanism display the
> per-command message:
>
> error(INFO, "command: %s not available in minimal mode\n", args[0]);
> ...and then perhaps followed up immediately with the acceptable command
> list again.
I have done this code change
>
> Another minor suggestion -- I think you can put the "eval" command in
> the supported list. I use it all the time, and in this minimal environment
> it may come in very handy. (There may be others, but they're probably not
> worth having...)
allowed eval to be executed in minimal mode
Thanks
Yeehaw
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: allow-minimal-crash-functionality.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 3546 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/attachments/20080818/689d6e51/attachment.bin>
More information about the Crash-utility
mailing list