<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/16/13 09:09, Dave Anderson wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1767644127.7039912.1381928975487.JavaMail.root@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
----- Original Message -----
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I have some code that allows this. See the following mail thread:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/174807">http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/174807</a>
The questions are:
1. Does remote access have a specification?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
If you're talking about the remote.c file in the crash sources, no,
there's nothing other than the remote.c file itself.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Ok, looks like I will need to write something up.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1767644127.7039912.1381928975487.JavaMail.root@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> 2. Is it supported?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
It's been deprecated for almost 10 years now. I don't understand how
you have been able to even get it to build, never mind work as the mail
thread indicates?</pre>
</blockquote>
crash is still building remote.c in 7.0.2-0 and still accepts the
command line option:<br>
<blockquote><tt>don-760:~/rpmbuild/BUILD/crash-7.0.2>./crash -d99
localhost:5001</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>crash 7.0.2</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Copyright (C) 2002-2013 Red Hat, Inc.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Copyright (C) 2004, 2005, 2006, 2010 IBM Corporation</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Hewlett-Packard Co</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Copyright (C) 2005, 2006, 2011, 2012 Fujitsu Limited</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Copyright (C) 2006, 2007 VA Linux Systems Japan K.K.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Copyright (C) 2005, 2011 NEC Corporation</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Copyright (C) 1999, 2002, 2007 Silicon Graphics, Inc.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Mission Critical
Linux, Inc.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>This program is free software, covered by the GNU General
Public License,</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies
of it under</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>certain conditions. Enter "help copying" to see the
conditions.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>This program has absolutely no warranty. Enter "help
warranty" for details.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> </tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>server: [localhost]</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> port: [5001]</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> file1: [(null)]</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> file2: [(null)]</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>127.0.0.1</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>don-760.cloudswitch.com: Unknown host</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>crash: connect [don-760.cloudswitch.com:5001] failed</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>don-760:~/rpmbuild/BUILD/crash-7.0.2></tt><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1767644127.7039912.1381928975487.JavaMail.root@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> But I don't know anything about xen_crash, xentrace,
or how it even interacts with the crash utility? It looks like it might
replace the old "crashd" daemon that was built as part of the old remote
access facility?
</pre>
</blockquote>
Yes, that is the case. My guess is that using crashd was more pain
the help. However the big plus in the case is that the guest (domU)
is paused while crash is running and so can be seen more like a dump
and not a active system. I have found that crash has some issues
between active, remote, and dump modes; but most of them are speed
related or start-up like guessing the kernel version.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1767644127.7039912.1381928975487.JavaMail.root@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> 3. Should the code be part of xen or crash?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I don't know. Xen support is no longer something I'm actively involved
with since Red Hat dropped support for it. Since then, Xen support in
the crash utility has primarily come from Daniel Kiper from Oracle and
Petr Tesarik from SUSE. They are both on the list, and should see this
message, but I'll cc them in this response as well.
Thanks,
Dave
</pre>
</blockquote>
I think <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:david.vrabel@citrix.com">david.vrabel@citrix.com</a> is also involved now (adding to CC
list).<br>
-Don Slutz<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1767644127.7039912.1381928975487.JavaMail.root@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
--
Crash-utility mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Crash-utility@redhat.com">Crash-utility@redhat.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>