[Devtools] CDK as shared development platform -- viable use case?

[Rick Wagner]

Thanks for that, Todd.

I'll put together a note to an OpenShift Lab stakeholder, I'll copy you  on
it.

Rick

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Todd Mancini <tmancini at redhat.com> wrote:

> This sounds like it's smacking into the use case for OpenShift Lab, so we
> really should coordinate with the OpenShift team to make sure this is going
> down a path they want. We can take offline with them.
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Rick Wagner <rwagner at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello DevTools CDK SMEs,
>>
>> We have a customer support case [1] where the user wishes to install the
>> CDK and then make it available for team development purposes.
>>
>> They'd like to allow developers on different machines to connect to the
>> OpenShift instance using their office VLan's address of 192.168.x.x instead
>> of the default 10.1.x.x.
>>
>> So, a few questions:
>>
>> - Considering the active Xip.io thread in SE-JBoss, should we consider
>> this a core use-case?  (With accompanying documentation?)
>>
>> - Is this a recommended use?  It seems the CDK is more of a 'personal'
>> development environment than a 'team' development environment.  Should this
>> use be discouraged?
>>
>> - Do we have any specific words of advice for this user?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for all thoughts offered.  As usual, CEE will dutifully
>> KCS the tips provided.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> [1] https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/01674763
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devtools mailing list
>> Devtools at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/devtools/attachments/20160808/b52a516b/attachment.htm>