From manderse at redhat.com Sun Feb 5 22:08:00 2017 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 23:08:00 +0100 Subject: [Devtools] gitvfs Message-ID: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/visualstudioalm/2017/02/03/announcing-gvfs-git-virtual-file-system/ If this works then that is amazing and I hope it gets adoption fast and can be used outside just windows. Being able to checkout/clone subparts of a git Repo incrementally is super useful and could solve or reduce a lot of workflow issues created by Gits limits. /max http://about.me/maxandersen From tmancini at redhat.com Mon Feb 6 13:08:55 2017 From: tmancini at redhat.com (Todd Mancini) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:08:55 +0100 Subject: [Devtools] gitvfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It's cool, if you need it (i.e. your repo is really massive). Note that it means that you need to be online to do a number of operations that you once thought were local, unless you do some good planning for all of the files you may need to get your work done offline. Windows Filter Drivers, which this is built upon, are cool -- you can add all sorts of tricks to the file system. (FUSE in Linux is very similar.) Our model of Spaces + multiple Codebases hopefully gives users a better alternative -- a logical collection of multiple repos, no OS tricks required. :) On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > > https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/visualstudioalm/2017/02/03/ > announcing-gvfs-git-virtual-file-system/ > > If this works then that is amazing and I hope it gets adoption fast and > can be used outside just windows. > > Being able to checkout/clone subparts of a git Repo incrementally is super > useful and could solve or reduce a lot of workflow issues created by Gits > limits. > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > _______________________________________________ > Devtools mailing list > Devtools at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From manderse at redhat.com Mon Feb 6 13:17:50 2017 From: manderse at redhat.com (Max Rydahl Andersen) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:17:50 +0100 Subject: [Devtools] gitvfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 6 Feb 2017, at 14:08, Todd Mancini wrote: > It's cool, if you need it (i.e. your repo is really massive). For me it is a nice alternative to handle some of limits of git submodules. > Note that it > means that you need to be online to do a number of operations that you once > thought were local, unless you do some good planning for all of the files > you may need to get your work done offline. > > Windows Filter Drivers, which this is built upon, are cool -- you can add > all sorts of tricks to the file system. (FUSE in Linux is very similar.) > > Our model of Spaces + multiple Codebases hopefully gives users a better > alternative -- a logical collection of multiple repos, no OS tricks > required. :) Not really comparable. monorepos have really nice advantages over going completely crazy having tons of multiple repos - and well balanced set of standalone repos have other advantages over monorepos. If something like git vfs had been around earlier I think we would have a much saner balance of repos. /max > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen > wrote: > >> >> https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/visualstudioalm/2017/02/03/ >> announcing-gvfs-git-virtual-file-system/ >> >> If this works then that is amazing and I hope it gets adoption fast and >> can be used outside just windows. >> >> Being able to checkout/clone subparts of a git Repo incrementally is super >> useful and could solve or reduce a lot of workflow issues created by Gits >> limits. >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devtools mailing list >> Devtools at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools >> /max http://about.me/maxandersen From omajid at redhat.com Tue Feb 7 20:32:23 2017 From: omajid at redhat.com (Omair Majid) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Devtools] Non-x86_64 variants of RHEL? In-Reply-To: <20161010164510.GA3514@redhat.com> References: <20161010164510.GA3514@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20170207203223.GI22012@redhat.com> * Omair Majid [2016-10-10 12:45]: > The Red Hat Developers programs lets developers get access to RHEL for > $0. But this only includes x86_64, as far as I can tell: > http://developers.redhat.com/products/rhel/get-started/ > > Is there anything available for non-x86_64 architectures? An external > developer I know is looking for ppc64 variants. Anyone? Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681 From rattapat at redhat.com Mon Feb 13 20:28:53 2017 From: rattapat at redhat.com (Rajith Attapattu) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Devtools] [openshift] Need some help with DNS setup Message-ID: I'm trying to get an openshift cluster going for demos. For now both master and node are on the same machine. I've got things working except my routes are not externally accessible due to DNS issues. I've deployed dnsmasq but unable to get my master and node to use 8053 instead of 53. I've modified the master-config.yaml but it still tries to connect to 53. fyi I'm using the following guide. https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/11/19/dns-your-openshift-v3-cluster/ Any help resolving this issue is much appreciated. Regards, Rajith Muditha Attapattu Middleware Architect, Red Hat 647 408 2150 rajith at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pmuir at redhat.com Tue Feb 14 08:06:26 2017 From: pmuir at redhat.com (Pete Muir) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:36:26 +0530 Subject: [Devtools] [openshift] Need some help with DNS setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I suspect you want to post to openshift-sme:-) On 14 February 2017 at 01:58, Rajith Attapattu wrote: > I'm trying to get an openshift cluster going for demos. > For now both master and node are on the same machine. I've got things > working except my routes are not externally accessible due to DNS issues. > > I've deployed dnsmasq but unable to get my master and node to use 8053 > instead of 53. > I've modified the master-config.yaml but it still tries to connect to 53. > > fyi I'm using the following guide. > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/11/19/dns-your-opens > hift-v3-cluster/ > > Any help resolving this issue is much appreciated. > > Regards, > > Rajith Muditha Attapattu > Middleware Architect, Red Hat > 647 408 2150 > rajith at redhat.com > > _______________________________________________ > Devtools mailing list > Devtools at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ibuziuk at redhat.com Tue Feb 28 19:04:32 2017 From: ibuziuk at redhat.com (Ilya Buziuk) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:04:32 +0100 Subject: [Devtools] OpenShift public learning materials for potential customers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: CC: devtools On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Ilya Buziuk wrote: > Hello, > > Today my former employer contact me and ask about public learning > materials for OpenShift. Basically, they would like to train ~5 employees > to work with the platform [1]. They would also like to have some kind of > webinar after the process of self learning from Red Hat (I guess smth. > similar to the internal "OpenShift Training" we had last week). > Could you please point to the right person for such kind of requests? > > P.S. I am not sure I have chosen the right mailing list, so feel free to > change / add recipients. > > Thanks! > > [1] https://www.openshift.com/container-platform/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ibuziuk at redhat.com Tue Feb 28 22:38:14 2017 From: ibuziuk at redhat.com (Ilya Buziuk) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:38:14 +0100 Subject: [Devtools] OpenShift public learning materials for potential customers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Brice Thank you for your response Last week training was just great, but I do believe the materials are for internal use only. It would be great to get the contact of someone who has authority to discuss such kind of requests from other companies. On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Brice Fallon-Freeman wrote: > Hi, Ilya > > I'm not sure if docs can help you with internal training materials, but > perhaps Graham can. > > Graham led the training last week, so he might be better accustomed to > this kind of stuff. > > Good luck! > Brice > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Ilya Buziuk wrote: > >> CC: devtools >> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Ilya Buziuk wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Today my former employer contact me and ask about public learning >>> materials for OpenShift. Basically, they would like to train ~5 employees >>> to work with the platform [1]. They would also like to have some kind of >>> webinar after the process of self learning from Red Hat (I guess smth. >>> similar to the internal "OpenShift Training" we had last week). >>> Could you please point to the right person for such kind of requests? >>> >>> P.S. I am not sure I have chosen the right mailing list, so feel free to >>> change / add recipients. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> [1] https://www.openshift.com/container-platform/ >>> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: