[Devtools] [devtools-team] [IMPORTANT INFORMATION - PLEASE READ] jboss.org PHX2 Shutdown

[Ondrej Dockal]

Again, thanks Max for that!

I have created a jira to have a visible place for JBT/Studio efforts to
keep track of this.

Adding Fuse tooling team to the loop.

Ondrej

[1]: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JBIDE-28286

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:31 AM Stephane Bouchet <sbouchet at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Great, thank you max for this.
> I'm looking forward to have some clarification for the future releases of
> JbossTools/Codeready studio as we are heavily using Rsync on
> filemgmt.jboss.org to make our release available to the public.
>
> Regards,
>
> Le jeu. 20 janv. 2022 à 10:23, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse at redhat.com>
> a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I reached out to the Marks (Newton, Eastman and Little) and are working
>> on
>> getting some clarifications in place. For now just await an update.
>>
>> /max
>>
>> I don't understand why a structure like RH cannot offer such a service
>> for the amount of projects requiring such a service.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:08 PM Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Any updates /feedback here ?
>>>
>>> Are we really saying that it is cheaper to tell countless projects to
>>> migrate data to random places, have engineering staff setup and update
>>> alternative ci pipelines than maintain a static backed storage ?
>>>
>>> Any docs on how to retain urls etc. so we don't break users and
>>> customers ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> As i wrote in my first response to this thread i was worrying about it,
>>> but now with the latest Mark Newton's msg it is even worse. So we are
>>> encouraged to migrate websites completely or active access for uploading to
>>> it is discontinued?
>>>
>>> I think that change would deserve a special email with different topic
>>> as it changes what is bringing to us as original msg was nothing changes
>>> for projects only the datacenter.
>>> Dne 1/16/22 v 18:58 Max Rydahl Andersen napsal(a):
>>>
>>> On 15 Jan 2022, 17:42 +0100, mlittle-all at redhat.com, wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> As such project teams are encouraged to look for alternative hosting
>>> providers for any static content they wish to host before then and should
>>> take the opportunity to do so before 31st Mar if they want to avoid any
>>> unforeseen issues with the filemgmt.jboss.org migration.
>>>
>>>
>>> What does this mean exactly ? That we can’t upload new content via file
>>> Mgmt or that the data goes away ?
>>>
>>> The latter I can’t see as an option as that is where basically all
>>> intelli, vscode and eclipse plugins been served out of so it will break
>>> tons of active projects.
>>>
>>> In any case what is the plans to make sure urls used in lots of our
>>> tools and ci processes can continue to work after filemgt no longer can be
>>> used for upload ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marek Novotny
>>> --
>>>
>>> RedHat JBoss Middleware
>>>
>>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
>>> Purkynova 111
>>> 612 45 Brno
>>>
>>>
>>> /max
>>> https://xam.dk/about
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jeff Maury
>>
>> Manager, DevTools
>>
>> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com>
>>
>> jmaury at redhat.com
>> @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat>   Red Hat
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
>> <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>> <https://redhat.com/summit>
>>
>>
>> /max
>> https://xam.dk/about
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devtools mailing list
>> Devtools at redhat.com
>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Stéphane Bouchet
>
> Senior Software Engineer, R&D
>
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
> _______________________________________________
> Devtools mailing list
> Devtools at redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/devtools/attachments/20220120/160538cb/attachment.htm>