[dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] multipath.conf(5): improve documentation of dev_loss_tmo

[Martin Wilck]

On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 14:48 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Reading through it, on the line below, shouldn't it be -t (not -T)?
> 

No, -T is correct. -t prints the entire internal table, most of which
doesn't apply on any given system. -T prints only the settings for
hardware that's present in the given system, which is what most users
will prefer (I assume).

But thanks for reading carefully. Appreciated!

Martin



> Line:
> +the multipath-tools built-in settings override the default. Run
> \fImultipath -T\fR
> 
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 11:58 AM Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 18:57 +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 18:31 +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > > > On 12/1/22 11:32, mwilck at suse.com wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > From: Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > The statement that the default is 600 is wrong in most cases.
> > > > > Improve the description of the default and the dependency of
> > > > > this
> > > > > parameter on other parameters.
> > > > 
> > > > I did change this patch to move "default value" to bottom.
> > > 
> > > The problem is that there is no easily explained default value
> > > for
> > > this
> > > parameter. Nice as the common "default value" format is, it
> > > doesn't
> > > apply here.
> > > 
> > > If you have a suggestion for improving the formatting or wording,
> > > please speak up.
> > 
> > Sorry, I missed your other email because it had been sorted into a
> > different folder.
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > --
> > dm-devel mailing list
> > dm-devel at redhat.com
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
> >