[dm-devel] [v2 2/4] dm ioctl: Allow userspace to provide expected diskseq
Markus Elfring
Markus.Elfring at web.de
Tue Jun 27 07:19:02 UTC 2023
>> See also another bit of background information once more:
>> [PATCH v2] certs/extract-cert: Fix checkpatch issues
>> 2023-06-09
>> https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-janitors/c464c4ee-038c-47bf-857a-b11a89680e82@kadam.mountain/
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/6/9/879
>
> Markus, it's not about imperative tense. It's about you wasting
> people's time.
>
> Read the subject again. "Allow userspace to provide expected diskseq".
> That is imperative tense.
Yes for the patch subject.
(Patch/commit descriptions can be adjusted accordingly.)
> I have not pointed it out to you because it
> just doesn't matter at all. If it's in imperative tense or if it's not
> in imperative tense, it doesn't matter.
It seems that known development documentation expresses opposite requirements.
> You're sending out a lot of messages and quite a few times it looks like
> your targeting newbies.
I dare to send some change suggestions (or reminders) to various contributors.
> One new developer sent me an email privately
> who was over the top grateful when I told him he could ignore you.
> The guy was like, "I was so puzzled, because it's my first patch
> and I didn't know how to respond."
Thanks for such information.
> This was an experienced programmer
> who we want, but he was new to the kernel community so he didn't know
> if we had bizarre rules or whatever.
There is some guidance available already.
Development experiences can and will grow further.
> I've looked through your patches that have recently been merged.
Thanks for another look.
> Some of those maintainers know that you are banned
Yes, of course.
> and that your patches are not getting any review from the mailing list.
Review approaches are generally improvable.
> We are really trying to be nice and to work around your situation.
Can remaining communication difficulties be resolved better anyhow?
> But don't start bothering newbies who don't know what the situation is.
I do not distinguish some of my patch feedback on the contributor category.
Regards,
Markus
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list