<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE id=ridTitle>Message</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<STYLE>BODY {
MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
LI.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=ridBody background="">
<DIV><SPAN class=627494220-27112007>Hi,</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=627494220-27112007></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=627494220-27112007>Is there any advantage to one specific IO
scheduler (below) that may improve IO performance / throughput when running with
a round-robin failover policy? Has anyone done testing with this ... and
willing to share results?</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=627494220-27112007></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=627494220-27112007>thanks,</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=627494220-27112007>Paul</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<LI>Completely Fair Queuing—elevator=cfq (default)
<LI>Deadline—elevator=deadline
<LI>NOOP—elevator=noop
<LI>Anticipatory—elevator=as </LI>
<P> </P></BODY></HTML>