<div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>Branch 2016-02-10-thin-dev-on-4.4</div><div><br></div><a href="https://github.com/jthornber/linux-2.6/commit/9b0d197c86371bc4de01dcb7d7b1a49664d5d15e">https://github.com/jthornber/linux-2.6/commit/9b0d197c86371bc4de01dcb7d7b1a49664d5d15e</a><br><div><a href="https://github.com/jthornber/linux-2.6/commit/04a082129113de7c495eb609cdfcbbedc6cab3a3">https://github.com/jthornber/linux-2.6/commit/04a082129113de7c495eb609cdfcbbedc6cab3a3</a><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 at 22:03 Mike Snitzer <<a href="mailto:snitzer@redhat.com">snitzer@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Thu, Feb 11 2016 at  5:41am -0500,<br>
Joe Thornber <<a href="mailto:thornber@redhat.com" target="_blank">thornber@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:13:05PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:<br>
> > Shouldn't get_policy()'s call to get_policy_once() resolve "mq" to be<br>
> > "smq" if we just add this to the bottom of dm-cache-policy-smq?:<br>
> ><br>
> > MODULE_ALIAS("dm-cache-mq");<br>
><br>
> Yes, you're right.  See my fixup patch.<br>
<br>
Hmm, not seeing what you consider to be the latest fixed up version..<br>
(nothing that sets: MODULE_ALIAS("dm-cache-mq") in smq.c)<br>
<br>
But I've staged this in linux-next for 4.6, see:<br>
<a href="https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=8cbd0cb8cca67baa3e430fb6d636613fdc1cee1a" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=8cbd0cb8cca67baa3e430fb6d636613fdc1cee1a</a><br>
</blockquote></div>