[edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 4/8] CryptoPkg/Crt: satisfy "inet_pton.c" dependencies (CVE-2019-14553)

[Wu, Jiaxin]

> > Hm.
> >
> > If you're porting a whole standard C library to EDK2 then I suppose it
> > makes sense to build up all this infrastructure for it.
> >
> > But in this case when it's only the single inet_pton() function that
> > you need, perhaps it makes more sense to 'port' that one function to
> > UEFI (or just reimplement it looking like EDK2 code), instead of
> > bringing all this stuff along with it?
> 
> I didn't want to take responsibility for touching any of that code -- I
> wanted it to be a piece of the puzzle that we'd just drop in. Its coding
> style is very foreign to edk2 norms, so once we started, we wouldn't
> stop before rewriting it more or less completely. (For example it quite
> frequently consumes the values that assignment expressions evaluate to,
> which is a huge no-no in edk2, as far as I understand.) I have no
> capacity for such a rework (or additional ownership / responsibility),
> sorry.
> 
> I worked from Friday evening to Saturday ~6-7AM as my "second sprint" on
> this code and its testing, until I was satisfied with the test coverage.
> I apologize but I simply cannot repeat that. This is all I can
> contribute code-wise (and testing-wise) to fixing this issue.


Jian, 

do you think it makes sense to keep the exiting coding style of inet_pton() in edk2\CryptoPkg\Library\BaseCryptLib\SysCall? (Personally, I can accept that).

> 
> Thanks
> Laszlo
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#49576): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/49576
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/37952588/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-