[edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for APs.
Dong, Eric
eric.dong at intel.com
Wed Apr 22 09:00:40 UTC 2020
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel at edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel at edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Dong, Eric
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 4:23 PM
> To: Ni, Ray <ray.ni at intel.com>; devel at edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>; Kumar, Chandana C
> <chandana.c.kumar at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT
> context for APs.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ni, Ray
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:54 PM
> > To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong at intel.com>; devel at edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>; Kumar, Chandana C
> > <chandana.c.kumar at intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for
> APs.
> >
> > Please check my comments in below.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dong, Eric <eric.dong at intel.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 9:35 AM
> > > To: devel at edk2.groups.io
> > > Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni at intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>;
> > > Kumar, Chandana C <chandana.c.kumar at intel.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for APs.
> > >
> > > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2683
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This patch used to fix a ASSERT because AP can't find the CpuMpData.
> >
> > 1. This patch fixes an assertion because AP can't find the CpuMpData.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > When AP been waked up through Init-Sipi-Sipi, the IDT should been
> > > restore to preallcated buffer to make it can get the CpuMpData
> > > through IDT base address.
> > > Not when CpuMpData->InitFlag is ApInitReconfig or ApInitConfig, AP
> > > will be wake up through Init-Sipi-Sipi. Current code already has
> > > logic to handle ApInitConfig, but miss the handler for
> > > ApInitReconfig. This patch fixes this gap.
> >
> > 2. When AP is waken up through Init-Sipi-Sipi, AP's IDT should be
> > restored to pre-allocated buffer so AP can get the CpuMpData through
> > the IDT base address.
> > Current code already has logic to handle this when CpuMpData->
> > InitFlag is ApInitConfig but misses the logic when CpuMpData->InitFlag
> > is ApInitReconfig.
> > This patch fixes this gap.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Chandana Kumar <chandana.c.kumar at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > > b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > > index 64a4c3546e..ac7f92fd48 100644
> > > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > > @@ -664,8 +664,9 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
> > > BistData = *(UINT32 *) ((UINTN) ApTopOfStack - sizeof
> > > (UINTN));
> > >
> > > //
> > >
> > > // CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters is initialized
> > > based on BSP environment,
> > >
> > > - // to initialize AP in InitConfig path.
> > >
> > > - // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData-
> > >CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters
> > > points to a different IDT shared by all APs.
> > >
> > > + // to initialize AP in InitConfig/ApInitReconfig path.
> > >
> > > + // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData-
> > >CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters
> > > points to a
> > >
> > > + // different IDT shared by all APs.
> > >
> > > //
> > >
> > > RestoreVolatileRegisters
> > > (&CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters,
> > > FALSE);
> > >
> > > InitializeApData (CpuMpData, ProcessorNumber, BistData,
> > > ApTopOfStack);
> > >
> > > @@ -673,6 +674,16 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
> > >
> > >
> > > InterlockedDecrement ((UINT32 *) &CpuMpData-
> > >MpCpuExchangeInfo-
> > > >NumApsExecuting);
> > >
> > > } else {
> > >
> > > + if ((CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig) && (CpuMpData-
> > > >ApLoopMode != ApInHltLoop)) {
> > >
> > > + //
> > >
> > > + // CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters is initialized
> > > + based on
> > > BSP environment,
> > >
> > > + // to initialize AP in InitConfig/ApInitReconfig path.
> >
> > 3.
> > Initialize AP volatile registers in ApInitReconfig path.
> > ApInitReconfig happens when:
> > 1. AP is re-enabled after it's disabled, in either PEI or DXE phase.
> > 2. AP is initialized in DXE phase.
> >
> > >
> > > + // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData-
> > > >CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters points to a
> > >
> > > + // different IDT shared by all APs.
> > >
> > > + //
> > >
> > > + RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData-
> > >CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters,
> > > FALSE);
> >
> > 4. Is it possible to combine this function call with the restoration code
> below?
> >
>
I move the code into the else of " if (CpuMpData->ApLoopMode == ApInHltLoop)", it's truly better than original.
Please see my v2 change.
Thanks,
Eric
> New logic changes code flow when CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig.
> In original flow, the code does RestoreVolatileRegisters and CpuFlushTlb, but
> new code only does CpuFlushTlb.
> Is CpuFlushTlb not needs if wake up through Init-Sipi-Sipi? I prefer to not
> change this code flow.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
> > if (CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig) {
> > //
> > // ApInitReconfig happens when:
> > // 1. AP is re-enabled after it's disabled, in either PEI or DXE phase.
> > // 2. AP is initialized in DXE phase.
> > // In either case, use the volatile registers value derived from BSP.
> > // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in
> > CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters
> > points to a
> > // different IDT shared by all APs.
> > //
> > RestoreVolatileRegisters
> > (&CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters,
> > FALSE);
> > } else {
> > if (CpuMpData->ApLoopMode == ApInHltLoop) {
> > //
> > // Restore AP's volatile registers saved before AP is halted
> > //
> > RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData-
> > >CpuData[ProcessorNumber].VolatileRegisters, TRUE);
> > } else {
> > //
> > // The CPU driver might not flush TLB for APs on spot after updating
> > // page attributes. AP in mwait loop mode needs to take care of it
> when
> > // woken up.
> > //
> > CpuFlushTlb ();
> > }
> > }
> > >
> > > + }
> > >
> > > +
> > >
> > > //
> > >
> > > // Execute AP function if AP is ready
> > >
> > > //
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.23.0.windows.1
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#57793): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/57793
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/73187416/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the edk2-devel-archive
mailing list