[edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/PartitionDxe: Put the UDF check ahead of MBR

Gao, Zhichao zhichao.gao at intel.com
Wed Aug 12 00:44:39 UTC 2020


OK. I would put the detail in next version patch. Let me put a sample here:

With patch #3 but without patch #1, the MBR table of ISO 9660 image can be handled correctly, i.e. it would be treat as MBR block device. We can find the bootable image thru MBR path FAT filesystem. When boot Linux Distribution, it comes into the grub console instead of the installation selection.

Thanks,
Zhichao

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray <ray.ni at intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 9:49 PM
> To: Gao, Zhichao <zhichao.gao at intel.com>; devel at edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang at intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu at intel.com>;
> Gary Lin <glin at suse.com>; Andrew Fish <afish at apple.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/PartitionDxe: Put the UDF check ahead
> of MBR
> 
> > > This would also solve the issue that ISO image with MBR would be
> > > treat as MBR device instead of CD/DVD. That would make the behavior
> > > of the image boot different.
> 
> Can you please explain this in detail?
> It's ok to not provide the "root" cause of why the image boot behavior is different.
> Saying the specific issue can help people to understand the issue in future.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gao, Zhichao <zhichao.gao at intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 4:34 PM
> > To: Ni, Ray <ray.ni at intel.com>; devel at edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang at intel.com>; Wu, Hao A
> > <hao.a.wu at intel.com>; Gary Lin <glin at suse.com>; Andrew Fish
> > <afish at apple.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/PartitionDxe: Put the UDF check
> > ahead of MBR
> >
> > Ray,
> >
> > The MBR info is correct. The order change is to avoid the MBR being
> > checked before UDF/ISO 9660 check.
> > That is why I make the patch #3 in the last of the patch set.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zhichao
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ni, Ray <ray.ni at intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 4:04 PM
> > > To: Gao, Zhichao <zhichao.gao at intel.com>; devel at edk2.groups.io
> > > Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang at intel.com>; Wu, Hao A
> > > <hao.a.wu at intel.com>; Gary Lin <glin at suse.com>; Andrew Fish
> > > <afish at apple.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/PartitionDxe: Put the UDF
> > > check
> > ahead
> > > of MBR
> > >
> > > Zhichao,
> > > Can you also add notes in the commit message describing that for
> > > some ISOs (better with more specific ISO info), the MBR information is not
> correct?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ray
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Gao, Zhichao <zhichao.gao at intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 2:43 PM
> > > > To: devel at edk2.groups.io
> > > > Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang at intel.com>; Wu, Hao A
> > > > <hao.a.wu at intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni at intel.com>; Gary Lin
> > > > <glin at suse.com>; Andrew Fish <afish at apple.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/PartitionDxe: Put the UDF check
> > > > ahead of MBR
> > > >
> > > > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2823
> > > >
> > > > Refer to UEFI spec 2.8, Section 13.3.2, a block device should be
> > > > scanned as below order:
> > > > 1. GPT
> > > > 2. ISO 9660 (El Torito) (UDF should aslo be here) 3. MBR 4. no
> > > > partition found
> > > > Note: UDF is using the same boot method as CD, so put it in the
> > > > same priority with ISO 9660.
> > > >
> > > > This would also solve the issue that ISO image with MBR would be
> > > > treat as MBR device instead of CD/DVD. That would make the
> > > > behavior of the image boot different.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang at intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu at intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni at intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Gary Lin <glin at suse.com>
> > > > Cc: Andrew Fish <afish at apple.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Disk/PartitionDxe/Partition.c | 10
> > > > +++++++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Disk/PartitionDxe/Partition.c
> > > > b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Disk/PartitionDxe/Partition.c
> > > > index 6a43c3cafb..473e091320 100644
> > > > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Disk/PartitionDxe/Partition.c
> > > > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Disk/PartitionDxe/Partition.c
> > > > @@ -35,11 +35,19 @@ EFI_DRIVER_BINDING_PROTOCOL
> > > > gPartitionDriverBinding = {
> > > >
> > > >  //
> > > >  // Prioritized function list to detect partition table.
> > > > +// Refer to UEFI Spec 13.3.2 Partition Discovery, the block
> > > > +device // should be scanned in below order:
> > > > +// 1. GPT
> > > > +// 2. ISO 9660 (El Torito) (or UDF) // 3. MBR // 4. no partiton
> > > > +found // Note: UDF is using a same method as booting from CD-ROM,
> > > > +so put it
> > > along
> > > > +//        with CD-ROM check.
> > > >  //
> > > >  PARTITION_DETECT_ROUTINE mPartitionDetectRoutineTable[] = {
> > > >    PartitionInstallGptChildHandles,
> > > > -  PartitionInstallMbrChildHandles,
> > > >    PartitionInstallUdfChildHandles,
> > > > +  PartitionInstallMbrChildHandles,
> > > >    NULL
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.21.0.windows.1
> > >
> >
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#64019): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/64019
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76121500/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-





More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list