[edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Always get CPUID & PlatformID in MicrocodeDetect()

Wu, Hao A hao.a.wu at intel.com
Thu Feb 6 01:39:30 UTC 2020


Thanks Siyuan and Eric,

The patch has been pushed via commit a9e3458ba7.

Best Regards,
Hao Wu


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dong, Eric
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2020 9:47 PM
> To: devel at edk2.groups.io; Wu, Hao A
> Cc: Ni, Ray; Laszlo Ersek; Fu, Siyuan; Kinney, Michael D
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Always get
> CPUID & PlatformID in MicrocodeDetect()
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong at intel.com>
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel at edk2.groups.io <devel at edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Wu, Hao
> A
> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 8:35 AM
> To: devel at edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu at intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong at intel.com>;
> Ni, Ray <ray.ni at intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>; Fu, Siyuan
> <siyuan.fu at intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney at intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Always get CPUID &
> PlatformID in MicrocodeDetect()
> 
> REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2498
> 
> Commit fd30b00707 updated the logic in function MicrocodeDetect() that
> will directly use the CPUID and PlatformID information from the 'CpuData'
> field in the CPU_MP_DATA structure, instead of collecting these information
> for each processor via AsmCpuid() and AsmReadMsr64() calls respectively.
> 
> At that moment, this approach worked fine for APs. Since:
> a) When the APs are waken up for the 1st time (1st MpInitLibInitialize()
>    entry at PEI phase), the function InitializeApData() will be called for
>    each AP and the CPUID and PlatformID information will be collected.
> 
> b) During the 2nd entry of MpInitLibInitialize() at DXE phase, when the
>    APs are waken up again, the function InitializeApData() will not be
>    called, which means the CPUID and PlatformID information will not be
>    collected. However, the below logics in MicrocodeDetect() function:
> 
>   CurrentRevision = GetCurrentMicrocodeSignature ();
>   IsBspCallIn     = (ProcessorNumber == (UINTN)CpuMpData->BspNumber) ?
> TRUE : FALSE;
>   if (CurrentRevision != 0 && !IsBspCallIn) {
>     //
>     // Skip loading microcode if it has been loaded successfully
>     //
>     return;
>   }
> 
>    will ensure that the microcode detection and application will be
>    skipped due to the fact that such process has already been done in the
>    PEI phase.
> 
> But after commit 396e791059, which removes the above skip loading logic,
> the CPUID and PlatformID information on APs will be used upon the 2nd
> entry of the MpInitLibInitialize(). But since the CPUID and PlatformID
> information has not been collected, it will bring issue to the microcode
> detection process.
> 
> This commit will update the logic in MicrocodeDetect() back to always
> collecting the CPUID and PlatformID information explicitly.
> 
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong at intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni at intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>
> Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu at intel.com>
> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu at intel.com>
> ---
>  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
> index b6675b9a60..67e214d463 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ MicrocodeDetect (
>    UINT32                                  InCompleteCheckSum32;
>    BOOLEAN                                 CorrectMicrocode;
>    VOID                                    *MicrocodeData;
> +  MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID_REGISTER           PlatformIdMsr;
>    UINT32                                  ThreadId;
>    BOOLEAN                                 IsBspCallIn;
> 
> @@ -115,8 +116,18 @@ MicrocodeDetect (
>    }
> 
>    ExtendedTableLength = 0;
> -  Eax.Uint32 = CpuMpData-
> >CpuData[ProcessorNumber].ProcessorSignature;
> -  PlatformId = CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].PlatformId;
> +  //
> +  // Here data of CPUID leafs have not been collected into context
> + buffer, so  // GetProcessorCpuid() cannot be used here to retrieve CPUID
> data.
> +  //
> +  AsmCpuid (CPUID_VERSION_INFO, &Eax.Uint32, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +
> +  //
> +  // The index of platform information resides in bits 50:52 of MSR
> + IA32_PLATFORM_ID  //
> +  PlatformIdMsr.Uint64 = AsmReadMsr64 (MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID);
> + PlatformId = (UINT8) PlatformIdMsr.Bits.PlatformId;
> +
> 
>    //
>    // Check whether AP has same processor with BSP.
> --
> 2.12.0.windows.1
> 
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#53836): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53836
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/70934372/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-





More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list