[edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Send SEND_STATUS at lower frequency

Wu, Hao A hao.a.wu at intel.com
Mon Feb 24 07:00:59 UTC 2020


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Albecki, Mateusz
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 11:17 PM
> To: devel at edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Albecki, Mateusz; Wu, Hao A; Marcin Wojtas; Gao, Zhichao; Gao, Liming
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Send SEND_STATUS
> at lower frequency
> 
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1140
> 
> To avoid stability issues on some designs the driver
> will now send SEND_STATUS at previous, lower, frequency
> when upgrading the bus timing.


Hello Mateusz,

The patch looks like a refinement. So I plan to push it (after the reviewing
process) after the upcoming stable tag. Does it work for you?

A couple of inline comments below:


> 
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu at intel.com>
> Cc: Marcin Wojtas <mw at semihalf.com>
> Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao at intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao at intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Albecki <mateusz.albecki at intel.com>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c    | 124
> +++++++++++++++++----
>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.c |   2 +-
>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.h |   1 +
>  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c   |   2 +
>  4 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> index 776c0e796c..c2ebd37623 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> @@ -558,6 +558,41 @@ EmmcTuningClkForHs200 (
>    return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
>  }
> 
> +/**
> +  Check the SWITCH operation status.
> +
> +  @param[in] PassThru  A pointer to the
> EFI_SD_MMC_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL instance.


Please help to add the comments for parameters 'Slot' and 'Rca'.


> +
> +  @retval EFI_SUCCESS  The SWITCH finished siccessfully.
> +  @retval others       The SWITCH failed.
> +**/
> +EFI_STATUS
> +EmmcCheckSwitchStatus (
> +  IN EFI_SD_MMC_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL  *PassThru,
> +  IN UINT8                          Slot,
> +  IN UINT16                         Rca
> +  )
> +{
> +  EFI_STATUS  Status;
> +  UINT32      DevStatus;
> +
> +  Status = EmmcSendStatus (PassThru, Slot, Rca, &DevStatus);
> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "EmmcCheckSwitchStatus: Send status fails
> with %r\n", Status));
> +    return Status;
> +  }
> +
> +  //
> +  // Check the switch operation is really successful or not.
> +  //
> +  if ((DevStatus & BIT7) != 0) {
> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "EmmcCheckSwitchStatus: The switch
> operation fails as DevStatus is 0x%08x\n", DevStatus));
> +    return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> +  }
> +
> +  return EFI_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>    Switch the bus width to specified width.
> 
> @@ -591,7 +626,6 @@ EmmcSwitchBusWidth (
>    UINT8               Index;
>    UINT8               Value;
>    UINT8               CmdSet;
> -  UINT32              DevStatus;
> 
>    //
>    // Write Byte, the Value field is written into the byte pointed by Index.
> @@ -617,24 +651,53 @@ EmmcSwitchBusWidth (
>      return Status;
>    }
> 
> -  Status = EmmcSendStatus (PassThru, Slot, Rca, &DevStatus);
> +  Status = EmmcCheckSwitchStatus (PassThru, Slot, Rca);
>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> -    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "EmmcSwitchBusWidth: Send status fails
> with %r\n", Status));
>      return Status;
>    }
> -  //
> -  // Check the switch operation is really successful or not.
> -  //
> -  if ((DevStatus & BIT7) != 0) {
> -    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "EmmcSwitchBusWidth: The switch operation
> fails as DevStatus is 0x%08x\n", DevStatus));
> -    return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> -  }
> 
>    Status = SdMmcHcSetBusWidth (PciIo, Slot, BusWidth);
> 
>    return Status;
>  }
> 
> +/**
> +  Checks if given clock frequency is supported on
> +  given bus timing.
> +
> +  @param[in] ClockFreq  Clock frequency to check in KHz.
> +  @param[in] BusTiming  Bus timing against which frequency will be
> compared.
> +
> +  @retval TRUE   Frequency is valid for given bus timing.
> +  @retval FALSE  Frequency is invalid for given bus timing.
> +**/
> +BOOLEAN
> +EmmcIsFrequencySupportedOnBusTiming (
> +  IN UINT64           ClockFreq,
> +  IN SD_MMC_BUS_MODE  BusTiming
> +  )
> +{
> +  UINT32  MaxFreq;
> +
> +  switch (BusTiming) {
> +    case SdMmcMmcLegacy:
> +      MaxFreq = 26000;
> +      break;
> +    case SdMmcMmcHsSdr:
> +    case SdMmcMmcHsDdr:
> +      MaxFreq = 52000;
> +      break;
> +    case SdMmcMmcHs200:
> +    case SdMmcMmcHs400:
> +      MaxFreq = 200000;
> +      break;
> +    default:
> +      return FALSE;
> +  }
> +
> +  return (ClockFreq <= MaxFreq);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>    Switch the bus timing and clock frequency.
> 
> @@ -669,9 +732,9 @@ EmmcSwitchBusTiming (
>    UINT8                     Index;
>    UINT8                     Value;
>    UINT8                     CmdSet;
> -  UINT32                    DevStatus;
>    SD_MMC_HC_PRIVATE_DATA    *Private;
>    UINT8                     HostCtrl1;
> +  BOOLEAN                   DelaySendStatus;
> 
>    Private = SD_MMC_HC_PRIVATE_FROM_THIS (PassThru);
>    //
> @@ -695,7 +758,7 @@ EmmcSwitchBusTiming (
>        Value = 0;
>        break;
>      default:
> -      DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "EmmcSwitchBusTiming: Unsupported
> BusTiming(%d\n)", BusTiming));
> +      DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "EmmcSwitchBusTiming: Unsupported
> BusTiming(%d)\n", BusTiming));
>        return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>    }
> 
> @@ -724,6 +787,27 @@ EmmcSwitchBusTiming (
>      return Status;
>    }
> 
> +  //
> +  // For cases when we switch bus timing to higher mode from current we
> want to
> +  // send SEND_STATUS at current, lower, frequency then the target
> frequency to avoid
> +  // stability issues. It has been observed that some designs are unable to
> process the
> +  // SEND_STATUS at higher frequency during switch to HS200 @200MHz
> irrespective of the number of retries
> +  // and only running the clock tuning is able to make them work on target
> frequency.
> +  //
> +  // For cases when we are downgrading the frequency and current high
> frequency is invalid
> +  // we have to first change the frequency to target frequency and then send
> the SEND_STATUS.
> +  //
> +  if (EmmcIsFrequencySupportedOnBusTiming (Private-
> >Slot[Slot].CurrentFreq, BusTiming) &&


One question here. I am not sure if we need to perform the above frequency
check by EmmcIsFrequencySupportedOnBusTiming().

My understanding is that the below functions call sequence:
EmmcSetBusMode() -> EmmcGetTargetBusMode() -> EmmcGetTargetClockFreq()

can ensure target frequency specified by 'ClockFreq' is supported by the target
bus mode specified by 'BusTiming'. If current working frequency is smaller than
the target frequency, it should be supported by the target bus mode as well.

Best Regards,
Hao Wu


> +      (Private->Slot[Slot].CurrentFreq < (ClockFreq * 1000))) {
> +    Status = EmmcCheckSwitchStatus (PassThru, Slot, Rca);
> +    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> +      return Status;
> +    }
> +    DelaySendStatus = FALSE;
> +  } else {
> +    DelaySendStatus = TRUE;
> +  }
> +
>    //
>    // Convert the clock freq unit from MHz to KHz.
>    //
> @@ -732,17 +816,11 @@ EmmcSwitchBusTiming (
>      return Status;
>    }
> 
> -  Status = EmmcSendStatus (PassThru, Slot, Rca, &DevStatus);
> -  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> -    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "EmmcSwitchBusTiming: Send status fails
> with %r\n", Status));
> -    return Status;
> -  }
> -  //
> -  // Check the switch operation is really successful or not.
> -  //
> -  if ((DevStatus & BIT7) != 0) {
> -    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "EmmcSwitchBusTiming: The switch operation
> fails as DevStatus is 0x%08x\n", DevStatus));
> -    return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> +  if (DelaySendStatus) {
> +    Status = EmmcCheckSwitchStatus (PassThru, Slot, Rca);
> +    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> +      return Status;
> +    }
>    }
> 
>    return Status;
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.c
> index b18ff3e972..57f4cf329a 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ EFI_DRIVER_BINDING_PROTOCOL
> gSdMmcPciHcDriverBinding = {
>    NULL
>  };
> 
> -#define SLOT_INIT_TEMPLATE {0, UnknownSlot, 0, 0, 0, \
> +#define SLOT_INIT_TEMPLATE {0, UnknownSlot, 0, 0, 0, 0, \
>                                 {EDKII_SD_MMC_BUS_WIDTH_IGNORE,\
>                                 EDKII_SD_MMC_CLOCK_FREQ_IGNORE,\
>                                 {EDKII_SD_MMC_DRIVER_STRENGTH_IGNORE}}}
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.h
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.h
> index 5bc3577ba2..bb3d38482f 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.h
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ typedef struct {
>    BOOLEAN                            MediaPresent;
>    BOOLEAN                            Initialized;
>    SD_MMC_CARD_TYPE                   CardType;
> +  UINT64                             CurrentFreq;
>    EDKII_SD_MMC_OPERATING_PARAMETERS  OperatingParameters;
>  } SD_MMC_HC_SLOT;
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c
> index 43626fff48..7971196a25 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c
> @@ -931,6 +931,8 @@ SdMmcHcClockSupply (
>      }
>    }
> 
> +  Private->Slot[Slot].CurrentFreq = ClockFreq;
> +
>    return Status;
>  }
> 
> --
> 2.14.1.windows.1


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#54750): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/54750
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71452564/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-





More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list