[edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] EmbeddedPkg/AcpiLib: add GICC table init macro for ACPI 6.3

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:07, Pete Batard <pete at akeo.ie> wrote:
>
> On 2020.03.30 15:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:56, Pete Batard <pete at akeo.ie> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2020.03.30 14:20, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:12, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:09, Pete Batard <pete at akeo.ie> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2020.03.30 14:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>>>>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 14:06, Pete Batard <pete at akeo.ie> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Incidentally, this is not an [edk2-platform] patch, as the subject line
> >>>>>>> from previous mail seemed to indicate, but an [edk2] patch.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do we have a user for this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes we do. I have a pachset lined up that updates the Raspberry Pi ACPI
> >>>>> to 6.3, that has a dependency on this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> But does the RPi have SPE and the associated overflow interrupt?
> >>
> >> No, but it doesn't matter since the specs indicate that SPE values can
> >> be set to zero if unused/non-applicable.
> >>
> >>>> ACPI
> >>>> is designed to be backward compatible, so it is perfectly acceptable
> >>>> to use the 6.2 macros in the context of a firmware implementation that
> >>>> complies with 6.3.
> >>
> >> This is what happens if you try to use EFI_ACPI_6_0_GICC_STRUCTURE_INIT
> >> in a 6.3 context:
> >>
> >> /usr/src/edk2/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Acpi10.h:297:33: error:
> >> excess elements in scalar initializer [-Werror]
> >>    #define EFI_ACPI_RESERVED_BYTE  0x00
> >>                                    ^~~~
> >> Building ...
> >> /usr/src/edk2/MdePkg/Library/DxeCoreHobLib/DxeCoreHobLib.inf [AARCH64]
> >> /usr/src/edk2/EmbeddedPkg/Include/Library/AcpiLib.h:64:30: note: in
> >> expansion of macro ‘EFI_ACPI_RESERVED_BYTE’
> >>        {EFI_ACPI_RESERVED_BYTE, EFI_ACPI_RESERVED_BYTE,
> >> EFI_ACPI_RESERVED_BYTE}         \
> >>                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> /usr/src/edk2-platforms/Platform/RaspberryPi/AcpiTables/Madt.aslc:64:5:
> >> note: in expansion of macro ‘EFI_ACPI_6_0_GICC_STRUCTURE_INIT’
> >>        EFI_ACPI_6_0_GICC_STRUCTURE_INIT (
> >>        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >
> > What do you mean exactly by 'in a 6.3 context': are you trying to
> > statically initialize a 63 struct with the 60 macro?
>
> Yes. I am trying to upgrade all of our ACPI tables to 6.3, on account
> that (part of a commit message from the edk2-platform I have lined up):
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Because of its widespread availability and low price, we expect the
> Raspberry Pi source to be used by platform developers as a starting
> point to create their own platform implementation.
>

Actually, even though I *really* like the RPi4 port in terms of
functionality and polish, it is *not* a good example to follow to
build a new platform.

First of all, it is based on PrePi instead of PrePeiCore, and so it is
very difficult to add PEI phase drivers for, e.g., capsule update or
measured boot. But in general, the quirky hardware and firmware
arrangement make it a one-off design IMO, and new platforms should use
something like SynQuacer as a reference instead.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#56644): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/56644
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/72586671/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-