[edk2-devel] Uncrustify Conversion Detailed Plan and Extended Hard Freeze Update #4

Gerd Hoffmann kraxel at redhat.com
Thu Dec 2 11:00:44 UTC 2021


On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 12:05:24PM -0500, Michael Kubacki wrote:
> This can of course be done at a technical level but it smells of a code
> cohesion problem.
> 
> The code is in the edk2 project so it would reason that it should be uniform
> in style with other code and at least close to the EDK II C Coding Standard
> Specification.
> 
> Currently, git submodules and ignored path are already excluded in addition
> to the ability to mark packages in "audit mode" so they do not fail the
> results. I would personally prefer not to allow arbitrary subdirectories to
> diverge from the rest of the codebase / package but if there's consensus
> this is a good idea, I can look into adding it.

What is the plan for generated include files, for example the ones in
CryptoPkg/Library/Include/openssl?

take care,
  Gerd



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#84244): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/84244
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/87414953/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-





More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list