[edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] RFC: design review for TDVF in OVMF

[James Bottomley]

On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 00:24 +0000, Min Xu wrote:
> On 06/22/2021 9:39 PM, Laszlo wrote:
> > I should clarify: the relevant part of my preference is not that
> > "IntelTdx.dsc"
> > contain the *complete* TDVF feature set. The relevant part (for me)
> > is that
> > "OvmfPkgX64.dsc" *not* be over-complicated for the sake of TDX,
> > even
> > considering only the "basic" TDVF feature set. It's fine to
> > implement TDX in two
> > stages ("basic" and "complete"); my point is that even "basic"
> > should not over-
> > complicate "OvmfPkgX64.dsc".
> > 
> Thanks much for the comments and we don't want to make OvmfPkgX64.dsc
> over-complicated either. 
> We have updated the design slides to V0.95 and Slides 6-15 are
> discussing the
> Config-A and Config-B. 
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/files/Designs/2021/0611/TDVF_Design_Review%28v0.95%29.pptx
> Your comment is always welcome!

The mailing list still won't give me that file, can you update it in
the bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429

As well, please?

Thanks,

James





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#77020): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/77020
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/83283616/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-