[edk2-devel] [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] Proposal to add EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL support for AARCH64

[Leif Lindholm]

+Samer

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 3:51 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:

> > > So either we severely constrain the kind of code that we permit to run
> > > on other cores, or we enable the MMU and caches on each core as it
> > > comes out of reset, as well as do any other CPU specific
> > > initialization that we do for the primary core as well.
> >
> > The description for StartupAllAPs() has a note:
> > It is the responsibility of the consumer of the
> > EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL.StartupAllAPs() to make sure that the nature
> > of the code that is executed on the BSP and the dispatched APs is well
> > controlled. The MP Services Protocol does not guarantee that the
> > Procedure function is MP-safe. Hence, the tasks that can be run in
> > parallel are limited to certain independent tasks and well-controlled
> > exclusive code. EFI services and protocols may not be called by APs
> > unless otherwise specified.
> >
> > So I think this is actually fine, implementation-wise. *Except* for
> > the SwitchBSP function (where we're currently bailing out anyway).
>
> Ok, so that doesn't look as bad as I thought. But we'll have to be
> more strict than other arches: even EFI services and protocols that
> are marked as safe for execution under this MP protocol are likely to
> explode if they rely on CopyMem() or SetMem() for in/outputs that are
> not a multiple of 8 bytes in case the platform uses the
> BaseMemoryLibOptDxe flavour of this library, since it relies heavily
> on deliberately misaligned loads and stores.
>

I think there is no way a protocol defined in the UEFI specification could
be
safe to use by non-BSP. In PI, the only references I find to the protocol
are
in MM and SAL protocols.
And we're not even looking at EFI_MP_SERVICES_PPI at this point.

But it might be good to hear something from ARM whether the use of this
protocol which "must be produced on any system with more than one logical
processor"
*should* be able to rely on anything being set up for it, or whether we
need an aforementioned helper library.

/
    Leif


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#81749): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/81749
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/85854039/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/edk2-devel-archive/attachments/20211011/93da6755/attachment.htm>