[edk2-devel] [RFC] RISC-V QEMU virtual package

Abner Chang abner.chang at hpe.com
Mon Sep 6 04:16:03 UTC 2021


Thanks Liming. To have those modules under OvmfPkg also makes sense to me. See how others think of this.

Abner

From: gaoliming [mailto:gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn]
Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 9:07 AM
To: devel at edk2.groups.io; Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <abner.chang at hpe.com>
Cc: 'Ard Biesheuvel' <ard.biesheuvel at arm.com>; 'Michael D Kinney' <michael.d.kinney at intel.com>; 'Leif Lindholm' <leif at nuviainc.com>; ray.ni at intel.com; Schaefer, Daniel <daniel.schaefer at hpe.com>; 'Sunil V L' <sunilvl at ventanamicro.com>; jiewen.yao at intel.com; 'Ard Biesheuvel' <ardb+tianocore at kernel.org>; 'Gerd Hoffmann' <kraxel at redhat.com>
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] [RFC] RISC-V QEMU virtual package

Abner:
 If these modules are shared by ARM and RISC-V, they should not be ARM specific modules. I prefer to move them into OvmfPkg. Now, ArmVirtPkg also includes the modules from OvmfPkg.

 I also include OVMF package maintainers for this discussion.

Thanks
Liming
发件人: devel at edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel at edk2.groups.io> <devel at edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel at edk2.groups.io>> 代表 Abner Chang
发送时间: 2021年9月5日 11:15
收件人: devel at edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel at edk2.groups.io>
抄送: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at arm.com<mailto:ard.biesheuvel at arm.com>>; Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney at intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney at intel.com>>; Leif Lindholm <leif at nuviainc.com<mailto:leif at nuviainc.com>>; ray.ni at intel.com<mailto:ray.ni at intel.com>; Liming Gao <gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn<mailto:gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn>>; Schaefer, Daniel <daniel.schaefer at hpe.com<mailto:daniel.schaefer at hpe.com>>; Sunil V L <sunilvl at ventanamicro.com<mailto:sunilvl at ventanamicro.com>>
主题: [edk2-devel] [RFC] RISC-V QEMU virtual package

Hi all,
We currently have RISC-V edk2 OVMF package that can boot to Linux kernel on QEMU RISC-V virt platform.
First at all, we would like to create a folder RiscvVirtPkg under edk2 repo and integrated in the Platform CI build.

Second, RISC-V edk2 OVMF package leverages some edk2 libraries and drivers from ArmVirtPkg, such as FDT related modules for PCI bus, host bridge and etc. We would like to move those generic virtual drivers to
a common folder for ARM and RISC-V (I don’t think this way is necessary though). Or can we move those to just under OvmfPkg because OvmfPkg also provides some common drivers for the processor architectures.
Thoughts?

Thanks
Abner



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#80256): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/80256
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/85405739/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/edk2-devel-archive/attachments/20210906/666549c0/attachment.htm>


More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list