[edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms:PATCH] Modify processor _UID ordering by CPU default fused in MADT

Donald Kuo donald.kuo at intel.com
Mon Aug 1 03:02:03 UTC 2022


Thanks Jack

The changes looks good to me.

Donald

-----Original Message-----
From: Lin, JackX <jackx.lin at intel.com> 
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 3:25 PM
To: devel at edk2.groups.io
Cc: Lin, JackX <jackx.lin at intel.com>; Lin, JackX <jackx.lin at intel.com>; Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu at intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong at intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni at intel.com>; Chaganty, Rangasai V <rangasai.v.chaganty at intel.com>; Kuo, Donald <donald.kuo at intel.com>; Kumar, Chandana C <chandana.c.kumar at intel.com>; Palakshareddy; Palakshareddy, Lavanya C <lavanya.c.palakshareddy at intel.com>
Subject: [edk2-platforms:PATCH] Modify processor _UID ordering by CPU default fused in MADT

BIOS should not reordering cpu processor_uid

Signed-off-by: JackX Lin <JackX.Lin at intel.com>
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu at intel.com>
Cc: Dong Eric <eric.dong at intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao at intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni at intel.com>
Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty at intel.com>
Cc: Donald Kuo <Donald.Kuo at intel.com>
Cc: Chandana C Kumar <chandana.c.kumar at intel.com>
Cc: Palakshareddy, Lavanya C <lavanya.c.palakshareddy at intel.com>
Cc: JackX Lin <JackX.Lin at intel.com>
---
 Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c | 99 ++++-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
index c7e87cbd7d..d0e8891918 100644
--- a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
+++ b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Acpi/AcpiTables/AcpiPlatform.c
@@ -62,33 +62,6 @@ EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP        *mCpuApicIdOrderTable = NULL;
 UINTN                       mNumberOfCpus = 0;
 UINTN                       mNumberOfEnabledCPUs = 0;
 
-
-/**
-  The function is called by PerformQuickSort to compare int values.
-
-  @param[in] Left            The pointer to first buffer.
-  @param[in] Right           The pointer to second buffer.
-
-  @return -1                 Buffer1 is less than Buffer2.
-  @return  1                 Buffer1 is greater than Buffer2.
-
-**/
-INTN
-EFIAPI
-ApicIdCompareFunction (
-  IN CONST VOID                         *Left,
-  IN CONST VOID                         *Right
-  )
-{
-  UINT32  LeftApicId;
-  UINT32  RightApicId;
-
-  LeftApicId = ((EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *) Left)->ApicId;
-  RightApicId = ((EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *) Right)->ApicId;
-
-  return (LeftApicId > RightApicId)? 1 : (-1); -}
-
 /**
   Print Cpu Apic ID Table
 
@@ -168,21 +141,16 @@ SortCpuLocalApicInTable (
   EFI_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION                 ProcessorInfoBuffer;
   UINT32                                    Index;
   UINT32                                    CurrProcessor;
-  UINT32                                    BspApicId;
-  EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP                      TempVal;
   EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP                      *CpuIdMapPtr;
   UINT32                                    CoreThreadMask;
-  EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP                      *TempCpuApicIdOrderTable;
   UINT32                                    Socket;
 
-  Index      = 0;
   Status     = EFI_SUCCESS;
 
   if (mCpuOrderSorted) {
     return Status;
   }
 
-  TempCpuApicIdOrderTable = AllocateZeroPool (mNumberOfCpus * sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
   CoreThreadMask = (UINT32) ((1 << mNumOfBitShift) - 1);
 
   for (CurrProcessor = 0, Index = 0; CurrProcessor < mNumberOfCpus; CurrProcessor++, Index++) { @@ -192,7 +160,7 @@ SortCpuLocalApicInTable (
                            &ProcessorInfoBuffer
                            );
 
-    CpuIdMapPtr = (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *) &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index];
+    CpuIdMapPtr = (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP *) 
+ &mCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index];
     if ((ProcessorInfoBuffer.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT) != 0) {
       CpuIdMapPtr->ApicId  = (UINT32)ProcessorInfoBuffer.ProcessorId;
       CpuIdMapPtr->Thread  = ProcessorInfoBuffer.Location.Thread;
@@ -214,74 +182,16 @@ SortCpuLocalApicInTable (
     } //end if PROC ENABLE
   } //end for CurrentProcessor
 
-  //keep for debug purpose
   DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "::ACPI::  APIC ID Order Table Init.   CoreThreadMask = %x,  mNumOfBitShift = %x\n", CoreThreadMask, mNumOfBitShift));
-  DebugDisplayReOrderTable (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable);
 
   //
   // Get Bsp Apic Id
   //
-  BspApicId = GetApicId ();
-  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "BspApicId - 0x%x\n", BspApicId));
-
-  //
-  //check to see if 1st entry is BSP, if not swap it
-  //
-  if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[0].ApicId != BspApicId) {
-    for (Index = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
-      if ((TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].Flags == 1) && (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].ApicId == BspApicId)) {
-        CopyMem (&TempVal, &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
-        CopyMem (&TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[0], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
-        CopyMem (&TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[0], &TempVal, sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
-        break;
-      }
-    }
-
-    if (mNumberOfCpus <= Index) {
-      DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Asserting the SortCpuLocalApicInTable Index Bufferflow\n"));
-      return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
-    }
-  }
-
-  //
-  // 1. Sort TempCpuApicIdOrderTable,
-  //    sort it by using ApicId from minimum to maximum (Socket0 to SocketN), and the BSP must in the fist location of the table.
-  //    So, start sorting the table from the second element and total elements are mNumberOfCpus-1.
-  //
-  PerformQuickSort ((TempCpuApicIdOrderTable + 1), (mNumberOfCpus - 1), sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP), (SORT_COMPARE) ApicIdCompareFunction);
+  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "BspApicId - 0x%x\n", GetApicId ()));
 
-  //
-  // 2. Sort and map the primary threads to the front of the CpuApicIdOrderTable
-  //
-  for (CurrProcessor = 0, Index = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
-    if ((TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].Thread) == 0) { // primary thread
-      CopyMem (&mCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
-      CurrProcessor++;
-    }
-  }
 
   //
-  // 3. Sort and map the second threads to the middle of the CpuApicIdOrderTable
-  //
-  for (Index = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
-    if ((TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].Thread) == 1) { //second thread
-      CopyMem (&mCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
-      CurrProcessor++;
-    }
-  }
-
-  //
-  // 4. Sort and map the not enabled threads to the bottom of the CpuApicIdOrderTable
-  //
-  for (Index = 0; Index < mNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
-    if (TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index].Flags == 0) { // not enabled
-      CopyMem (&mCpuApicIdOrderTable[CurrProcessor], &TempCpuApicIdOrderTable[Index], sizeof (EFI_CPU_ID_ORDER_MAP));
-      CurrProcessor++;
-    }
-  }
-
-  //
-  // 5. Re-assign AcpiProcessorId for AcpiProcessorUid uses purpose.
+  // Fill in AcpiProcessorUid.
   //
   for (Socket = 0; Socket < FixedPcdGet32 (PcdMaxCpuSocketCount); Socket++) {
     for (CurrProcessor = 0, Index = 0; CurrProcessor < mNumberOfCpus; CurrProcessor++) { @@ -292,8 +202,7 @@ SortCpuLocalApicInTable (
     }
   }
 
-  //keep for debug purpose
-  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "APIC ID Order Table ReOrdered\n"));
+  DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "::ACPI::  APIC ID Order Table Init.   CoreThreadMask = %x,  mNumOfBitShift = %x\n", CoreThreadMask, mNumOfBitShift));
   DebugDisplayReOrderTable (mCpuApicIdOrderTable);
 
   mCpuOrderSorted = TRUE;
--
2.32.0.windows.2



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#92005): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92005
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/92666022/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list