[edk2-devel] Packages Missing CI YAML Files

[Michael Kubacki]

I meant are the maintainers aware that their package does not have a 
.ci.yaml file and they have intentionally made the decision to not 
include the file.

Different packages are in different states. Some package maintainers 
have explicitly chosen to comment out various plugins, put others in 
audit mode, etc. It could also be decided to not have the file at all. 
I'm also not sure who is responsible for ensuring whether all packages 
have the file.

On 8/1/2022 6:41 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hello Michael,
> 
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 00:28, Michael Kubacki
> <mikuback at linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Package Maintainers & Reviewers,
>>
>> Is it intentional that these packages do not have a .ci.yaml file?
>>
>>     1. EmbeddedPkg
>>     2. IntelFsp2Pkg
>>     3. IntelFsp2WrapperPkg
>>     4. SignedCapsulePkg
>>     5. SourceLevelDebugPkg
>>
>> This impacts CI running against these packages.
>>
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean with 'intentional'. Originally, no packages
> had .ci.yaml files, and over time, they were contributed for most of
> the packages.
> 
> If anyone wants to contribute .ci.yaml files for these packages as
> well, I would not object, so I guess it is not intentional in that
> sense, as far as I am concerned. But if the policy today is that all
> packages must have .ci.yaml files, I'm not sure who is on the hook to
> realize that.
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#92036): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92036
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/92759801/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-