[edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH Kun, v1 0/7] Add TPM subclass definition

[Kun Qin]

Hi SecurityPkg maintainers and EDK2 stewards,

The updated patch series was sent here: 
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/91330

Please let me know if there is any other feedback on them.

Thanks,
Kun

On 7/13/2022 6:19 PM, Kun Qin via groups.io wrote:
> Thanks, Mike. I will drop the applicable code change and send a v2 
> series shortly.
>
> Regards,
> Kun
>
> On 7/13/2022 5:47 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote:
>> Hi Kun,
>>
>> I would prefer to focus on the spec issue with this patch set and only
>> update DEC and .H file.
>>
>> The idea of removing all the status code related PCDs and updating 
>> all the
>> source files to use the #defines is a different change.  And that 
>> change may
>> impact many downstream modules/libs that currently use the PCDs.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Kun Qin <kuqin12 at gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 5:39 PM
>>> To: devel at edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D 
>>> <michael.d.kinney at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>; Wang, Jian J 
>>> <jian.j.wang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi1 <qi1.zhang at intel.com>; Kumar, 
>>> Rahul1
>>> <rahul1.kumar at intel.com>; Andrew Fish <afish at apple.com>; Leif 
>>> Lindholm <leif at nuviainc.com>; Gao, Liming
>>> <gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang.liu at intel.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH v1 0/7] Add TPM 
>>> subclass definition
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> The intention was to encourage the usage of new definition in .H file
>>> once the definition
>>> is updated. The PCD is left as is only to serve as backwards
>>> compatibility purpose.
>>>
>>> Do you think only updating the DEC and .H file is more ideal? I could
>>> drop the other changes
>>> if so desired.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kun
>>>
>>> On 7/13/2022 5:30 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote:
>>>> Hi Kun,
>>>>
>>>> Why was the PCD usage not preserved and only the value updated in 
>>>> the DEC file and .H file?
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Kun Qin <kuqin12 at gmail.com>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 5:21 PM
>>>>> To: devel at edk2.groups.io
>>>>> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>; Wang, Jian J 
>>>>> <jian.j.wang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi1 <qi1.zhang at intel.com>; Kumar,
>>> Rahul1
>>>>> <rahul1.kumar at intel.com>; Andrew Fish <afish at apple.com>; Leif 
>>>>> Lindholm <leif at nuviainc.com>; Kinney, Michael D
>>>>> <michael.d.kinney at intel.com>; Gao, Liming 
>>>>> <gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang.liu at intel.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging][PATCH v1 0/7] Add TPM 
>>>>> subclass definition
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi SecurityPkg maintainers & EDK2 stewards,
>>>>>
>>>>> I sent out this patch series intending to update/fix the PI spec 
>>>>> through
>>>>> code first process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please shed some light on it and let me know if any 
>>>>> feedback?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Kun
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/5/2022 8:38 PM, Kun Qin via groups.io wrote:
>>>>>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3966
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    From PI Specification v1.7 Errata A, EFI_PERIPHERAL_DOCKING is 
>>>>>> defined as
>>>>>> 0xD0000 (as well as included in PiStatusCode.h).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, subclass employed as PCD for TPM peripheral in 
>>>>>> SecurityPkg is
>>>>>> also defined as 0xD0000. The TPM subclass code was used in 
>>>>>> TcgPei.c when
>>>>>> reporting error codes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The collision of subclass definition could cause the parsing of 
>>>>>> reported
>>>>>> errors being ambiguous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch series add EFI_PERIPHERAL_TPM as a spec-defined value and
>>>>>> removed potential usages in the SecurityPkg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patch v1 branch: 
>>>>>> https://github.com/kuqin12/edk2/tree/BZ3966-add_tpm_subclass
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Andrew Fish <afish at apple.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif at nuviainc.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn>
>>>>>> Cc: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu at intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kun Qin (7):
>>>>>>      EDK2 Code First: PI Specification: New peripheral subclass 
>>>>>> for TPM
>>>>>>      MdePkg: MmCommunication: Add TPM subclass definition to MdePkg
>>>>>>      SecurityPkg: Tcg2Dxe: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>>>>      SecurityPkg: Tcg2Pei: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>>>>      SecurityPkg: TcgDxe: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>>>>      SecurityPkg: TcgPei: Replace PcdStatusCodeSubClassTpmDevice
>>>>>>      SecurityPkg: SubClassTpm: Updated default value
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Dxe/Tcg2Dxe.c   |  4 +-
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Pei/Tcg2Pei.c   |  4 +-
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgDxe/TcgDxe.c     |  2 +-
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgPei/TcgPei.c     |  4 +-
>>>>>>     CodeFirst/BZ3966-SpecChange.md      | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>     MdePkg/Include/Pi/PiStatusCode.h    |  1 +
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dec         |  6 +-
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.uni         |  2 +-
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Dxe/Tcg2Dxe.inf |  1 -
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Pei/Tcg2Pei.inf |  1 -
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgDxe/TcgDxe.inf   |  1 -
>>>>>>     SecurityPkg/Tcg/TcgPei/TcgPei.inf   |  1 -
>>>>>>     12 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>>>>     create mode 100644 CodeFirst/BZ3966-SpecChange.md
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> 
>
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#91388): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/91388
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/92370677/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-