[edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] SecurityPkg/RngDxe: Fix Rng algo selection for Arm

[Sami Mujawar]

Hi Ard,

Please find my response inline marked [SAMI].

Regards,

Sami Mujawar

On 18/11/2022, 09:56, "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:

    On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 16:02, PierreGondois <pierre.gondois at arm.com> wrote:
    >
    > From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois at arm.com>
    >
    > BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4151
    >
    > The EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL can advertise multiple algorithms through
    > Guids. The PcdCpuRngSupportedAlgorithm contains a Guid that
    > can be configured. It represents the algorithm used in RngLib.
    > PcdCpuRngSupportedAlgorithm is set to the Zero Guid for KvmTool.
    >
    > When running KvmTool on a platform platform only having the RngLib,
    > the only Guid available for EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL will be the zero Guid.
    >
    > To select the default algorithm in EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL.GetRng():
    > a. Zero Guids are skipped
    > b. If no algorithm is found, an ASSERT is triggered
    >
    > To allow using the RngLib to be used for the case above, Zero Guids
    > should not be skipped (a.).
    > If no algorithm is found, don't prevent from booting on DEBUG builds
    > (b.).
    >
    > Allow Zero Guids to be selected and don't ASSERT if no algorithm is
    > found. Also simplify the selection of the Rng algorithm when the
    > default one is selected by just picking up the first element of
    > mAvailableAlgoArray.
    >
    > Reported-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar at arm.com>
    > Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois at arm.com>

    I am still confused by this.

    Does this mean we might register the RNG protocol if we don't have
    anything to back it up?
[SAMI] From a Guest firmware implementation perspective, we do not know the available RNG source.
It may be CPU RNG, Arm FW TRNG or VIRTIO RNG. 
I would assume either one of CPU RNG or Arm FW TRNG would be implemented on the host platform. If none of these are present, we would want to fall back to VIRTIO RNG.

Considering this, I think we should not register the EFI_RNG_PRTOCOL if no supported algorithms are present.

The other argument would be that the protocol allows discovery of supported RNG source. But looking how this is consumed in Linux, I think it is better to not register EFI_RNG_PRTOCOL if no supported algorithms are present.

Please do let me know your thoughts.
[/SAMI]


    > ---
    >
    > Notes:
    >     v2:
    >     - Reformulate commit message.
    >     - Do not warn if no algorithm is found as the message
    >       would be printed on non-Arm platforms.
    >
    >  .../RandomNumberGenerator/RngDxe/ArmRngDxe.c      | 15 +++------------
    >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
    >
    > diff --git a/SecurityPkg/RandomNumberGenerator/RngDxe/ArmRngDxe.c b/SecurityPkg/RandomNumberGenerator/RngDxe/ArmRngDxe.c
    > index 5ba319899ce9..722d53386373 100644
    > --- a/SecurityPkg/RandomNumberGenerator/RngDxe/ArmRngDxe.c
    > +++ b/SecurityPkg/RandomNumberGenerator/RngDxe/ArmRngDxe.c
    > @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ RngGetRNG (
    >    )
    >  {
    >    EFI_STATUS  Status;
    > -  UINTN       Index;
    >
    >    if ((This == NULL) || (RNGValueLength == 0) || (RNGValue == NULL)) {
    >      return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
    > @@ -86,21 +85,13 @@ RngGetRNG (
    >      //
    >      // Use the default RNG algorithm if RNGAlgorithm is NULL.
    >      //
    > -    for (Index = 0; Index < mAvailableAlgoArrayCount; Index++) {
    > -      if (!IsZeroGuid (&mAvailableAlgoArray[Index])) {
    > -        RNGAlgorithm = &mAvailableAlgoArray[Index];
    > -        goto FoundAlgo;
    > -      }
    > -    }
    > -
    > -    if (Index == mAvailableAlgoArrayCount) {
    > -      // No algorithm available.
    > -      ASSERT (Index != mAvailableAlgoArrayCount);
    > +    if (mAvailableAlgoArrayCount != 0) {
    > +      RNGAlgorithm = &mAvailableAlgoArray[0];
    > +    } else {
    >        return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
    >      }
    >    }
    >
    > -FoundAlgo:
    >    if (CompareGuid (RNGAlgorithm, PcdGetPtr (PcdCpuRngSupportedAlgorithm))) {
    >      Status = RngGetBytes (RNGValueLength, RNGValue);
    >      return Status;
    > --
    > 2.25.1
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------
    > Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
    > View/Reply Online (#96434): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96434
    > Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95067856/5717338
    > Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
    > Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [ardb+tianocore at kernel.org]
    > ------------
    >
    >



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#96492): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/96492
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95067856/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-