[edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 3/4] CI: Use Fedora 35 container (Linux only)

Chris Fernald chris.fernald at outlook.com
Thu Sep 22 00:33:49 UTC 2022


There is probably value in having both if we want to support various 
flavors of containers in the future, but yes adding a container option 
to the template similar to vm_image.

Thanks,
Chris

On 9/21/2022 1:26 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 01:01:04PM -0700, Chris Fernald wrote:
>> Similar to my comment about the assumption in use of python, I believe the
>> container should be determined and passed in as a parameter from the top
>> level pipeline file rather then relying on tool chain tag. This lets the
>> templates take action on being containerized rather then assuming the tool
>> chain. Additionally, this would give consistency between the platform and PR
>> templates which currently make opposite assumption about consumer vs
>> template determining the container image.
> 
> i.e. update .azurepipelines/Ubuntu-GCC5.yml and replace "vm_image: ..."
> with "container: ..."?
> 
> take care,
>    Gerd
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#94095): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/94095
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93805168/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list