Re: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13] BaseTools,CryptoPkg,MdePkg,OvmfPkg: Delete CLANG35,CLANG38,GCC48,GCC49, rename GCC5 to GCC, update CLANGDWARF, delete VS 2008-2013, EBC

[Rebecca Cran]

On 4/2/23 12:38 PM, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> As expressed off-list on UEFI talkbox, I like GCCNOLTO, but I would
> rather keep GCC5 as GCC5, for the next future iteration of "lets bump
> a new toolchain because we need feature X".

Given we've gone from GCC 5 through 12 with no new toolchains, I'd 
prefer to just have GCC.

> This is unsurprising, plenty of NOLTO build breakage. Since no one
> seems to use this, could we think about axing this or?
>
> Just seems silly to have an extra toolchain (with extra cognitive
> overhead for anyone looking at tools_def) for s/-flto//g

Since Liming wants to keep it, let's make all the other changes 
(deleting VS 2008-2013, CLANG35, CLANG38 etc.) and keep GCCNOLTO and GCC 
for now. If nobody fixes the problems with GCCNOLTO, maybe we can 
revisit dropping it in a few months?


-- 

Rebecca Cran



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#102366): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102366
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97919856/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-