[edk2-devel] [PATCH 00/11] OvmfPkg: add Crypto Driver support

Gerd Hoffmann kraxel at redhat.com
Fri Feb 3 15:36:54 UTC 2023


On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 02:33:07PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> What is the point of this series? If we are trying to deduplicate
> crypto code by moving it into a dedicated driver, can we please just
> do that unconditionally, instead of doubling the size of the
> validation matrix again? Or are there reasons why one might avoid this
> crypto driver approach?

Unfortunately it is not a clear size win everywhere.

PEI jumps up in size even though I'm using the min_pei config for
CryptoPei, seems it *still* has way too much bits compiled in
(didn't look into tweaking the config yet, hints are welcome).

-   17530 TcgPei
+   17146 TcgPei
+   34362 Tcg2Pei
-   51066 Tcg2Pei
+  333950 CryptoPei

SMM doesn't change much (slight increase):

+  106662 VariableSmm
-  540818 VariableSmm
+  479374 CryptoSmm

DXE is a clear win, three users go from > 400k to < 100k which easily
compensates for the almost 700k crypto driver:

+   17326 TlsDxe
-   19494 TcgDxe
+   19450 TcgDxe
+   36682 SecurityStubDxe
+   54630 Tcg2Dxe
-   68498 Tcg2Dxe
+   78898 SecureBootConfigDxe
+  121190 IScsiDxe
-  125174 IScsiDxe
-  404574 SecureBootConfigDxe
-  479414 SecurityStubDxe
-  667006 TlsDxe
+  696298 CryptoDxe

Overall it should still be a (small) win even without looking at why PEI
is so big.

If there are no objections I happily drop the USE_CRYPTO_DRIVER option
and switch over to the crypto driver unconditionally.

take care,
  Gerd



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#99604): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/99604
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/96722233/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list