[edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] DynamicTablesPkg: Allow multiple top level physical nodes

[PierreGondois]

Hello Jeff,
Thanks for the v2. Also cf the first discussion at:
   https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/96680589#99612
- I think it would be good to extract a function that does all the checks
as there are many possibilities for the flags/parent combinations.
- I think it would also be nice to reset the index of ProcContainers
for each new level (i.e. not to have the same incrementing index for
clusters/packages)

I created a branch based on your work at:
https://github.com/pierregondois/edk2/tree/pg/top_level_pnode_Wip

Regards,
Pierre

On 2/3/23 19:10, Jeff Brasen wrote:
> In SSDT CPU topology generator allow for multiple top level physical
> nodes as would be seen with a multi-socket system. This will create a
> top level processor container for all systems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen at nvidia.com>
> ---
>   .../SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c                | 43 ++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
> index c24da8ec71..46b757e0b2 100644
> --- a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
> +++ b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
> @@ -814,7 +814,8 @@ CreateAmlProcessorContainer (
>                                         Protocol Interface.
>     @param [in] NodeToken               Token of the CM_ARM_PROC_HIERARCHY_INFO
>                                         currently handled.
> -                                      Cannot be CM_NULL_TOKEN.
> +                                      CM_NULL_TOKEN if top level container
> +                                      should be created.
>     @param [in] ParentNode              Parent node to attach the created
>                                         node to.
>     @param [in,out] ProcContainerIndex  Pointer to the current processor container
> @@ -841,12 +842,12 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>     AML_OBJECT_NODE_HANDLE  ProcContainerNode;
>     UINT32                  Uid;
>     UINT16                  Name;
> +  UINT32                  NodeFlags;
>   
>     ASSERT (Generator != NULL);
>     ASSERT (Generator->ProcNodeList != NULL);
>     ASSERT (Generator->ProcNodeCount != 0);
>     ASSERT (CfgMgrProtocol != NULL);
> -  ASSERT (NodeToken != CM_NULL_TOKEN);
>     ASSERT (ParentNode != NULL);
>     ASSERT (ProcContainerIndex != NULL);
>   
> @@ -893,8 +894,14 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>         } else {
>           // If this is not a Cpu, then this is a processor container.
>   
> +        NodeFlags = Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Flags;
> +        // Allow physical property for top level nodes
> +        if (NodeToken == CM_NULL_TOKEN) {
> +          NodeFlags &= ~EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL;
> +        }
> +

I think that if (NodeToken == CM_NULL_TOKEN) and doesn't have the Physical Package
flag, no error will be triggered even though this is not a valid configuration.

>           // Acpi processor Id for clusters is not handled.
> -        if ((Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Flags & PPTT_PROCESSOR_MASK) !=
> +        if ((NodeFlags & PPTT_PROCESSOR_MASK) !=
>               PPTT_CLUSTER_PROCESSOR_MASK)
>           {
>             DEBUG ((
> @@ -974,8 +981,6 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
>     )
>   {
>     EFI_STATUS  Status;
> -  UINT32      Index;
> -  UINT32      TopLevelProcNodeIndex;
>     UINT32      ProcContainerIndex;
>   
>     ASSERT (Generator != NULL);
> @@ -984,8 +989,7 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
>     ASSERT (CfgMgrProtocol != NULL);
>     ASSERT (ScopeNode != NULL);
>   
> -  TopLevelProcNodeIndex = MAX_UINT32;
> -  ProcContainerIndex    = 0;
> +  ProcContainerIndex = 0;
>   
>     Status = TokenTableInitialize (Generator, Generator->ProcNodeCount);
>     if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> @@ -993,33 +997,10 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
>       return Status;
>     }
>   
> -  // It is assumed that there is one unique CM_ARM_PROC_HIERARCHY_INFO
> -  // structure with no ParentToken and the EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL
> -  // flag set. All other CM_ARM_PROC_HIERARCHY_INFO are non-physical and
> -  // have a ParentToken.
> -  for (Index = 0; Index < Generator->ProcNodeCount; Index++) {
> -    if ((Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].ParentToken == CM_NULL_TOKEN) &&
> -        (Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Flags &
> -         EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL))
> -    {
> -      if (TopLevelProcNodeIndex != MAX_UINT32) {
> -        DEBUG ((
> -          DEBUG_ERROR,
> -          "ERROR: SSDT-CPU-TOPOLOGY: Top level CM_ARM_PROC_HIERARCHY_INFO "
> -          "must be unique\n"
> -          ));
> -        ASSERT (0);
> -        goto exit_handler;
> -      }
> -
> -      TopLevelProcNodeIndex = Index;
> -    }
> -  } // for
> -
>     Status = CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>                Generator,
>                CfgMgrProtocol,
> -             Generator->ProcNodeList[TopLevelProcNodeIndex].Token,
> +             CM_NULL_TOKEN,
>                ScopeNode,
>                &ProcContainerIndex
>                );


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#99655): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/99655
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/96729031/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-