[edk2-devel] [PATCH 6/7] [PATCH v2] UefiCpuPkg: CpuTimerDxeRiscV64: fix tick duration accounting

Andrei Warkentin andrei.warkentin at intel.com
Thu Feb 23 23:54:53 UTC 2023


The TimerDxe implementation doesn't account for the physical
time passed due to timer handler execution or (perhaps even
more importantly) time spent with interrupts masked.

Other implementations (e.g. like the Arm one) do. If the
timer tick is always incremented at a fixed rate, then
you can slow down UEFI's perception of time by running
long sections of code in a critical section.

Cc: Sunil V L <sunilvl at ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Daniel Schaefer <git at danielschaefer.me>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <andrei.warkentin at intel.com>
---
 UefiCpuPkg/CpuTimerDxeRiscV64/Timer.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuTimerDxeRiscV64/Timer.c b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuTimerDxeRiscV64/Timer.c
index db153f715e60..50f57a9780f0 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuTimerDxeRiscV64/Timer.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuTimerDxeRiscV64/Timer.c
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ STATIC EFI_TIMER_NOTIFY  mTimerNotifyFunction;
 //
 // The current period of the timer interrupt
 //
-STATIC UINT64  mTimerPeriod = 0;
+STATIC UINT64  mTimerPeriod     = 0;
+STATIC UINT64  mLastPeriodStart = 0;
 
 /**
   Timer Interrupt Handler.
@@ -56,25 +57,31 @@ TimerInterruptHandler (
   )
 {
   EFI_TPL  OriginalTPL;
-  UINT64   RiscvTimer;
+  UINT64   PeriodStart = RiscVReadTimer ();
 
   OriginalTPL = gBS->RaiseTPL (TPL_HIGH_LEVEL);
   if (mTimerNotifyFunction != NULL) {
-    mTimerNotifyFunction (mTimerPeriod);
+    //
+    // For any number of reasons, the ticks could be coming
+    // in slower than mTimerPeriod. For example, some code
+    // is doing a *lot* of stuff inside an EFI_TPL_HIGH
+    // critical section, and this should not cause the EFI
+    // time to increment slower. So when we take an interrupt,
+    // account for the actual time passed.
+    //
+    mTimerNotifyFunction (PeriodStart - mLastPeriodStart);
   }
 
-  RiscVDisableTimerInterrupt (); // Disable SMode timer int
-  RiscVClearPendingTimerInterrupt ();
   if (mTimerPeriod == 0) {
+    RiscVDisableTimerInterrupt ();
     gBS->RestoreTPL (OriginalTPL);
-    RiscVDisableTimerInterrupt (); // Disable SMode timer int
     return;
   }
 
-  RiscvTimer               = RiscVReadTimer ();
-  SbiSetTimer (RiscvTimer += mTimerPeriod);
+  mLastPeriodStart          = PeriodStart;
+  SbiSetTimer (PeriodStart += mTimerPeriod);
+  RiscVEnableTimerInterrupt (); // enable SMode timer int
   gBS->RestoreTPL (OriginalTPL);
-  RiscVEnableTimerInterrupt (); // enable SMode timer int
 }
 
 /**
@@ -154,8 +161,6 @@ TimerDriverSetTimerPeriod (
   IN UINT64                   TimerPeriod
   )
 {
-  UINT64  RiscvTimer;
-
   DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "TimerDriverSetTimerPeriod(0x%lx)\n", TimerPeriod));
 
   if (TimerPeriod == 0) {
@@ -164,9 +169,9 @@ TimerDriverSetTimerPeriod (
     return EFI_SUCCESS;
   }
 
-  mTimerPeriod = TimerPeriod / 10; // convert unit from 100ns to 1us
-  RiscvTimer   = RiscVReadTimer ();
-  SbiSetTimer (RiscvTimer + mTimerPeriod);
+  mTimerPeriod     = TimerPeriod / 10; // convert unit from 100ns to 1us
+  mLastPeriodStart = RiscVReadTimer ();
+  SbiSetTimer (mLastPeriodStart + mTimerPeriod);
 
   mCpu->EnableInterrupt (mCpu);
   RiscVEnableTimerInterrupt (); // enable SMode timer int
-- 
2.25.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#100472): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/100472
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97196085/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list