[edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for handling SGI and pending interrupts

Kun Qin kuqin12 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 26 18:45:17 UTC 2023


Hi Ard,

Our current use case is around AP core suspension and wake-ups.

The program can suspend the secondary cores through PSCI interfaces 
(after powering
them on). BSP can then wake up the suspended cores through SGI on demand.

The pending interrupt manipulation is to support BSP suspension and 
wakeup. We
currently use watchdog timer to wake up suspended BSPs after a timeout.

Platforms can perform needed tasks during suspension, such as core power 
consumption
analysis, in UEFI environment.

Please let me if you have any suggestions.

Thanks,
Kun

On 7/26/2023 1:45 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 22:15, Kun Qin <kuqin12 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4466
>>
>> This patch series introduce a few improvements related to interrupt
>> handling for ArmGic driver and library.
>>
>> 1. The current implementation of the `ArmGicSendSgiTo` is based on GIC v2
>> and does not work on GIC v3 and on.
>> 2. The pending interrupt related primitives does not exist for end users.
>>
>> The change added the SGI support compatible with GIC v3 and v4. A few
>> pending interrupt related utility functions were also added.
>>
>> This change was tested on QEMU, FVP and proprietary hardware platforms.
>>
>> Pathc v1 branch: https://github.com/kuqin12/edk2/tree/improve_gic_v1
>>
>> Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol at quicinc.com>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar at arm.com>
>>
>> Kun Qin (3):
>>    ArmPkg: ArmGic: Added support to send SGI to NS G1 EL1
>>    ArmPkg: ArmGicLib: Added GIC v3 and v4 support to ArmGicSendSgiTo
>>    ArmPkg: ArmGic: Added functionalities to manipulate pending interrupts
>>
> Hello Kun,
>
> Could you please explain how this will be used by platforms?
>
> SGIs are only used by the MPcore SEC code, which is deprecated and
> shouldn't be used. And manipulating pending interrupts is another
> thing we should only support if there is a compelling use case.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#107276): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/107276
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/100337221/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list