[edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] OvmfPkg: Relax assertion that interrupts do not occur at TPL_HIGH_LEVEL

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 23:49, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> (cc Liming)
>
> On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 16:23, Michael Brown <mcb30 at ipxe.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 09/05/2023 14:31, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > > On 5/9/23 14:09, Michael Brown wrote:
> > >> At TPL_HIGH_LEVEL, CPU interrupts are disabled (as per the UEFI
> > >> specification) and so we should never encounter a situation in which
> > >> an interrupt occurs at TPL_HIGH_LEVEL. The specification also
> > >> restricts usage of TPL_HIGH_LEVEL to the firmware itself.
> > >>
> > >> However, nothing actually prevents a UEFI application from calling
> > >> gBS->RaiseTPL(TPL_HIGH_LEVEL) and then violating the invariant by
> > >> enabling interrupts via the STI or equivalent instruction. Some
> > >> versions of the Microsoft Windows bootloader are known to do this.
> > >>
> > >> NestedInterruptTplLib maintains the invariant that interrupts are
> > >> disabled at TPL_HIGH_LEVEL (even when performing the dark art of
> > >> deliberately manipulating the stack so that IRET will return with
> > >> interrupts still disabled), but does not itself rely on external code
> > >> maintaining this invariant.
> > >>
> > >> Relax the assertion that the interrupted TPL is below TPL_HIGH_LEVEL
> > >> to an error message, to allow UEFI applications such as these versions
> > >> of the Microsoft Windows bootloader to continue to function.
> > >>
> > >> Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189136
> > >> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>
> > >> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> > >> Cc: Oliver Steffen <osteffen at redhat.com>
> > >> Cc: Pawel Polawski <ppolawsk at redhat.com>
> > >> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao at intel.com>
> > >> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore at kernel.org>
> > >> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen at intel.com>
> > >>
> > >> Michael Brown (2):
> > >>    OvmfPkg: Clarify invariants for NestedInterruptTplLib
> > >>    OvmfPkg: Relax assertion that interrupts do not occur at
> > >>      TPL_HIGH_LEVEL
> > >>
> > >>   OvmfPkg/Library/NestedInterruptTplLib/Tpl.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++----
> > >>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >
> > > series
> > > Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Gerd: are you happy for your Reviewed-by to stand, since the only
> > changes since v1 were to comment wording?
>
> I'll assume that it stands if that was the only difference.
>
> I've queued this up now - thanks all for the hard work.
>
> (Note to Liming - this is definitely a candidate for the stable tag,
> see the bugzilla link for details)
>

Merged as #4371


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#104492): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/104492
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98782100/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-