Re: [edk2-devel] 回复: [edk2-devel] UEFI spec version in system table, shall we update it to 2.8?

[karunakar_poosapalli via groups.io]

In latest tianocore edk2 ( https://github.com/tianocore/edk2 ), we can see System table is still pointing to 2.70 Version(EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION)

https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h

//

// EFI Runtime Services Table

//

#define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_SIGNATURE      SIGNATURE_64 ('I','B','I',' ','S','Y','S','T')

#define EFI_2_80_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (80))

#define EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (70))

#define EFI_2_60_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (60))

#define EFI_2_50_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (50))

#define EFI_2_40_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (40))

#define EFI_2_31_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (31))

#define EFI_2_30_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (30))

#define EFI_2_20_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (20))

#define EFI_2_10_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (10))

#define EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (00))

#define EFI_1_10_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((1 << 16) | (10))

#define EFI_1_02_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((1 << 16) | (02))

#define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION       EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION

#define EFI_SPECIFICATION_VERSION       EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION

#define EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_SIGNATURE  SIGNATURE_64 ('R','U','N','T','S','E','R','V')

#define EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_REVISION   EFI_SPECIFICATION_VERSION

Does it mean latest tianocore is still not UEFI 2.8 version support or it supports 2.8 functionalities but the table version number is not yet updated?


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#108853): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/108853
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81906348/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/edk2-devel-archive/attachments/20230919/ee9467e1/attachment.htm>