Re: [edk2-devel] 回复: [edk2-devel] UEFI spec version in system table, shall we update it to 2.8?

Michael D Kinney michael.d.kinney at intel.com
Tue Sep 19 21:04:06 UTC 2023


I do not think anyone has done the complete analysis since UEFI 2.7.  Some updates from newer specs
have been added as needed by different community members.

Unless there are dedicated tasks to review and verify that every spec change has been added to edk2, the version can not be updated.

Mike

From: devel at edk2.groups.io <devel at edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Poosapalli, Karunakar via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 11:18 AM
To: Poosapalli, Karunakar <KarunakarPoosapalli at Dell.com>; devel at edk2.groups.io; POLUDOV, FELIX <felixp at ami.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] 回复: [edk2-devel] UEFI spec version in system table, shall we update it to 2.8?

Hi All,

Can you please share your thoughts if any idea in EDK2 compliance with UEFI 2.8 Support ?

From UEFI sources and latest edk2 master branch is still at 2.7. Same for latest stable tag edk2-stable202308.
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git
#define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION       EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION
#define EFI_SPECIFICATION_VERSION       EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION


But we could see some of the features from 2.8 is already available and UEFI 2.9 spec also released but system table in edk2 is still pointing to 2.7.

Curious to know, Whether latest edk2 is not fully compliance with 2.8 or only system table update is missing for 2.8

Thanks & Regards
Karunakar Poosapalli
Firmware Principal Engineer, Client BIOS
Customer BIOS | Dell Core BIOS
CPG Software Engineering | Dell Technologies
Mobile +91 9951902957
Karunakar_poosapalli at Dell.Com<mailto:Karunakar_poosapalli at Dell.Com>

From: karunakar_poosapalli via groups.io <karunakar_poosapalli=dell.com at groups.io<mailto:karunakar_poosapalli=dell.com at groups.io>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 10:41 PM
To: Poosapalli, Karunakar; devel at edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel at edk2.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] 回复: [edk2-devel] UEFI spec version in system table, shall we update it to 2.8?


[EXTERNAL EMAIL]

In latest tianocore edk2 (https://github.com/tianocore/edk2 [github.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/tianocore/edk2__;!!LpKI!mQ_BG3pFqn4l_WXu4-SMapIb2kzSZmeFEwZ9PNGLNx6j_YdYF6DUWQBuLZwoJhMzMQIiKG1dMBmDJH6eqgKzHbK-JfJWjjqXU1bQ$> ), we can see System table is still pointing to 2.70 Version(EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION)

https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h [github.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h__;!!LpKI!mQ_BG3pFqn4l_WXu4-SMapIb2kzSZmeFEwZ9PNGLNx6j_YdYF6DUWQBuLZwoJhMzMQIiKG1dMBmDJH6eqgKzHbK-JfJWjvHlQENb$>

//

// EFI Runtime Services Table

//

#define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_SIGNATURE      SIGNATURE_64 ('I','B','I',' ','S','Y','S','T')

#define EFI_2_80_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (80))

#define EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (70))

#define EFI_2_60_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (60))

#define EFI_2_50_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (50))

#define EFI_2_40_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (40))

#define EFI_2_31_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (31))

#define EFI_2_30_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (30))

#define EFI_2_20_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (20))

#define EFI_2_10_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (10))

#define EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (00))

#define EFI_1_10_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((1 << 16) | (10))

#define EFI_1_02_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((1 << 16) | (02))

#define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION       EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION

#define EFI_SPECIFICATION_VERSION       EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION



#define EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_SIGNATURE  SIGNATURE_64 ('R','U','N','T','S','E','R','V')

#define EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_REVISION   EFI_SPECIFICATION_VERSION



Does it mean latest tianocore is still not UEFI 2.8 version support or it supports 2.8 functionalities but the table version number is not yet updated?


Internal Use - Confidential



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#108860): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/108860
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81906348/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/3943202/1813853/130120423/xyzzy [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/edk2-devel-archive/attachments/20230919/f0ea8973/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list