Updating packages for dependencies

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Felix Schwarz wrote:
> 
> Toshio Kuratomi schrieb:
>> * Note: Felix, Luke, and I haven't banged out a definite opinion on 
>> what we ideally want to do in this situation yet... since this seems 
>> to touch on some rather basic EPEL policy, I thought it needed to be 
>> brought here for comment.
> 
> A short addition: I asked on the TurboGears mailing list for opinions 
> (nearly every TurboGears users will use formencode too) and got some 
> responses - mainly "update to 1.0.1 was ok, some minor problems":
> http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/bb4411abfc5633a1 
> 
Thanks Felix!  That's useful information for the formencode question. 
So my ideal would be updating to the incompatible version.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20080807/2bc59554/attachment.sig>