I'm with Toshio on this, I think unless issues arise the current setup is good. -AdamM (From Android) <blockquote type="cite">On Jun 18, 2010 2:13 PM, "Toshio Kuratomi" <<a href="mailto:a.badger@gmail.com">a.badger@gmail.com</a>> wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:00:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I brought this up at the EPEL m...I'm satisfied with this atm as it seems that currently those who do the work are getting the opportunity to make decisions. IMHO, if it turns out that many of those 95 packagers would like more input in the direction of EPEL but feel they can't because they aren't able to attend the meetings, then we need to look at something more formal. -Toshio _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list <a href="mailto:epel-devel-list@redhat.com">epel-devel-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list</a> </blockquote>