RE: On very different journalling activity on 2 servers.

[Nico Morrison <nico morrison micronicos com>]

Also here is the contents of /boot - I am concerned about this symblink:

lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           19 Feb  6 09:27 System.map ->
System.map-2.4.7-10

as all the other symblinks ppint to the latest version:

<SNIP>
[root ns5 boot]# ls -al
total 10908
drwxr-xr-x    3 root     root         4096 Feb  6 09:27 .
drwxr-xr-x   23 root     root         4096 Feb  6 09:56 ..
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         5824 Jun 25  2001 boot.b
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          612 Jun 25  2001 chain.b
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        42268 Nov 14 01:50 config-2.4.18-18.7.x
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        42257 Jan 31 12:20 config-2.4.18-24.7.x
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Feb  6 09:16 grub
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       126906 Dec 16 10:34
initrd-2.4.18-18.7.x.img
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       127368 Feb  6 09:15
initrd-2.4.18-24.7.x.img
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       337546 Feb 22  2002 initrd-2.4.7-10.img
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           14 Dec 16 10:33 kernel.h ->
kernel.h-2.4.9
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          405 Dec 16 10:33 kernel.h-2.4.9
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        23108 Jun 25  2001 message
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           25 Feb  6 09:15 module-info ->
module-info-2.4.18-24.7.x
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        15436 Nov 14 01:50
module-info-2.4.18-18.7.x
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        15436 Jan 31 12:20
module-info-2.4.18-24.7.x
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root        13598 Sep  6  2001 module-info-2.4.7-10
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          640 Jun 25  2001 os2_d.b
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           19 Feb  6 09:27 System.map ->
System.map-2.4.7-10
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       490460 Nov 14 01:50
System.map-2.4.18-18.7.x
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       490643 Jan 31 12:20
System.map-2.4.18-24.7.x
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       435039 Sep  6  2001 System.map-2.4.7-10
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root      2983920 Nov 14 01:50
vmlinux-2.4.18-18.7.x
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root      2986554 Jan 31 12:20
vmlinux-2.4.18-24.7.x
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           21 Feb  6 09:15 vmlinuz ->
vmlinuz-2.4.18-24.7.x
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root      1064284 Nov 14 01:50
vmlinuz-2.4.18-18.7.x
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root      1064546 Jan 31 12:20
vmlinuz-2.4.18-24.7.x
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       802068 Sep  6  2001 vmlinuz-2.4.7-10
</SNIP>

Is there some reason why System.map -> System.map-2.4.7-10 instead of
System.map-2.4.18-24.7.x

??

Thank you in advance.

Regards,
Nico Morrison
nico morrison micronicos com
___________________________________________
Micronicos Limited  -  London, UK.
Tel: +44 20 8870 8849 Fax: +44 20 8870 5290
___________________________________________

From: Stephen DeBrass [mailto:debrass staff singnet com sg]
Sent: 06 February 2003 10:20
To: Nico Morrison
Cc: 'Stephen C. Tweedie'; 'Andrew Morton'; ext3 users list
Subject: RE: On very different journalling activity on 2 servers.


On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Nico Morrison wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I have upgraded the 'bad' machine with the latest 'up2date' kernel, but it
> is possible that GRUB is still loading the older kernel. Our sysadmin at
the
> dayacentre says the console shows the old kernel kernel-2.4.7-10 
> 
> This might have happened because the first kernel upgrade I did on this
> machine I did manually by downloading the .rpm & installing it locally.
> 
> Now I know to use /use/sbin/up2date instead but ......

You may need to add an entry to /etc/grub.conf that looks something like:
title Red Hat Linux (2.4.19)
        root (hd0,0)
        kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.19 ro root=/dev/hda7

I believe grub picks defaults to booting the first entry it finds, someone
correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not all too familiar with grub...

> How do I tell from the machine (SSH) which kernel it is actually running?

uname -a

> Thanks - sorry to be so ignorant.

No problem :)

> Regards,
> Nico Morrison
> nico morrison micronicos com
> ___________________________________________
> Micronicos Limited  -  London, UK.
> Tel: +44 20 8870 8849 Fax: +44 20 8870 5290
> ___________________________________________
> 
> From: Stephen C. Tweedie [mailto:sct redhat com]
> Sent: 05 February 2003 10:13
> To: Nico Morrison
> Cc: 'Andrew Morton'; ext3 users list
> Subject: RE: On very different journalling activity on 2 servers.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 08:45, Nico Morrison wrote:
> 
> > [root ns5 nico]# /sbin/hdparm  /dev/hda
> > /dev/hda:
> >  using_dma    =  0 (off)
> 
> > Does this mean that dma is in fact off?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Looks like is ON on the server that has no problems and OFF on the one
> with
> > loadsa journalling?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > What do we need to do & is it safe to turn DMA ON on a busy working
public
> > internet server?
> 
> You don't.  
> 
> The trouble is, the kernel usually has a reason for not being in DMA
> mode.  If it can negotiate DMA, it will; but the older of your two
> systems did not do so, so either that older kernel doesn't know how to
> drive the IDE controller in DMA mode safely, or it has detected an error
> on the IDE bus and has backed off to non-DMA mode automatically.  In
> both cases, forcing DMA on manually is not recommended.
> 
> I'd suggest that you upgrade the 7.2 box to the current errata kernel,
> which is the same across all the 7.* releases.  That should give you the
> same updated IDE drivers as the 7.3 box has, and will hopefully get you
> running DMA properly.  If it doesn't, then you're going to have to check
> the logs to see why DMA isn't being negotiated.
> 
> Cheers,
>  Stephen
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ext3-users mailing list
> Ext3-users redhat com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
>