e2fsck errors after lvextend when trying to resize2fs
Douglas E. Warner
silfreed at silfreed.net
Mon Feb 7 01:08:22 UTC 2005
I found a thread that has almost the exact same symptoms as me, but didn't
seem to come to a resolution:
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2004-December/msg00018.html
I have an LVM(2) array that I've just lvextend'd and want to resize2fs, but I
can't get through the e2fsck. I get these errors when fsck-ing:
Group 3125's inode table at 102400545 conflicts with some other fs block.
Relocate? yes
Group 3125's inode table at 102400546 conflicts with some other fs block.
Relocate? yes
Group 3125's inode table at 102400547 conflicts with some other fs block.
Relocate? yes
Group 3125's block bitmap at 102400034 conflicts with some other fs block.
Relocate? yes
Group 3125's inode bitmap at 102400035 conflicts with some other fs block.
Relocate? yes
And contines to fsck, but then restarts the fsck around 66% and the exact same
errors occur again. If I cancel the fsck, I can still mount the partition
and everything seems fine, but I can't resize the partition without getting
through the fsck. Any thoughts? Let me know if I need to provide any more
information.
-Doug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20050206/bd96294f/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ext3-users
mailing list