bug triage considered useful?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 07:36 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
> > Provoking question:
> >
> > Am I the only person in Fedora who considers this bug triaging (esp.
> > today's) to be producing more noise and spam than useful results?
> 
> So far I've found it useful. The messages I'm getting have reminded me
> to re-look at a number of items I've filled to see if they are still
> relevant, which I've totally forgotten about filing against now dead
> Fedora releases.

Same here.  It's been extremely useful for making sure I'm not unfairly
taking up someone else's attention on their bug list.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20080514/375facd7/attachment.sig>