<div dir="ltr">having that be optional really hurts the value of the data for scientific study, since there is probably a correlation between how strategic a voter is and how likely he is to click that. <div class="gmail_quote"> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:30, Jesse Keating <<a href="mailto:jkeating@redhat.com">jkeating@redhat.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d">On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > Perhaps a good solution is to allow participants to opt in on a per-vote > basis: a checkbox that says "I consent to having my anonymized vote > published" could appear right on the vote form. (Vote data should also > be randomly ordered so that time-correlation is not possible). </div>This I like best, because it's a per voter, per instance thing, rather than a set of voters today deciding things for sets of voters in the future. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-advisory-board@redhat.com">fedora-advisory-board@redhat.com</a> <a href="http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board" target="_blank">http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board</a> </blockquote></div> -- clay shentrup phone: 206.801.0484 "Iraq? No, YOU rock!" </div>