Just "Fedora" looks fine. People most of the time omit the "Core" part while calling it. I saw that and myself did that. So, something like "Fedora 7" looks fine for the next version. Resetting version number will create huge confusion. I will suggest going on with current version no (7, 8 , 9). Cheers, Imtiaz <div>On 12/1/06, Walter Cervini <<a href="mailto:wcervini@gmail.com">wcervini@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Fedora BlueStorm or Fedora Twister <div>2006/11/30, Luya Tshimbalanga <<a href="mailto:luya_tfz@thefinalzone.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"> luya_tfz@thefinalzone.com</a>>:<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> How about "Fedora Synergy"? That name implies the effort from both community and developers and the fact it is the base of several distribution like Red Hat Enterprise Linux and One Laptop Per Child. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Project contributor <a href="http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/LuyaTshimbalanga" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/LuyaTshimbalanga </a> </blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div>