<html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /></head><body style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Sans"> Hi Max, Am Montag, 10. November 2008 13:44:59 schrieb Max Spevack: > (1) Do you like the "regional accountability" model that we are trying > to create for Ambassadors? This means having recognized leaders in each > part of the world who are responsible for making sure that Ambassadors > in that region get the resources that they need? Regional Accountability yes! Regional Leadership? I do not really know! Is it not a part of accountability to have also regional leadership? I am not a supporter of hierarchy and bureaucracy but i love to see that leadership comes by the people who work hard. I think we can avoid a lot of power-splitting if we have Ambassadors who keep an eye of our common goal - Maybe we should call them "FAmSCo-Liason"? > (2) Are the regional IRC meetings useful for organizing events and > getting things done? yes - it works! > Does this model mean that FAmSCo is not needed for > event organization? FAmSCo is not needed for organizing - therefore we are a self-propelled community and if help is needed there should be mentors for that! FAmSCo is legislative and a instrument to give us the tools and the structure, do the boring part of work and should be a Hub where active Ambassadors should have a clue of the big picture. > (3) What do you think FAmSCo should focus on? * Establish real mentoring within regional requirements * Establish measurability for our Work * Establish liasons to other subprojects * Invent new ways to encourage people to contribute to the Fedora Project * Improve the MembershipProcess to make it easier and faster to contribute and work together with higher quality CU Jorg -- Joerg (kital) Simon jsimon@fedoraproject.org http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon http://kitall.blogspot.com Key Fingerprint: 3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688 </body></html>