It's not our problem, if browser renders widgets ugly. We should provide native buttons or buttons with eye-candy bg. <div>2007/12/29, Rogue <<a href="mailto:roguexz@gmail.com">roguexz@gmail.com </a>>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote: > Firefox3 provides beautiful native GTK widgets, so we shouldn't provide > CSS for them. > The idea of CSS styling of the widgets is to ensure that the widgets look the same across different browsers. Jakub, you are comparing how the widget looks in Firefox 3 alone. What about other browsers? What if the native widgets in those other browsers look terrible? I would suggest that the overall CSS of FPO could be overhauled as part of the F9 release? Any thoughts on this one? later, Rogue -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - <a href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org"> http://enigmail.mozdev.org</a> iD8DBQFHdeU7ceS9IQvx51YRAvapAKCo8mUTxdGEgEtMs6GiUfb4uFtG9wCfY5+3 PSpWsN2Cp7PDhB2GAZNs0YU= =Ra6H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list <a href="mailto:Fedora-art-list@redhat.com">Fedora-art-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list">http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list </a> </blockquote></div>