2008/1/13, Mark <<a href="mailto:markg85@gmail.com">markg85@gmail.com</a>>:<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> 2008/1/13, Martin Sourada <<a href="mailto:martin.sourada@gmail.com">martin.sourada@gmail.com</a>>: > > On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 15:53 +0100, Mark wrote: > > the preferences-desktop icon is about as bright as this one is now. > > So i think it fits perfectly. > > > Not at all (IMO). It's not only about how bright it physically is, but > also how bright it feels, and in that case you need to compare it with > icons that will be together with it. I created an image where I compare > folder-network (since it has both globe which is used for more mimetypes > and a folder which is quite often seen in nautilus), your > package-x-generic and the one from guidelines. You can compare for > yourself. I think you should see that your package looks odd among the > other two (while good by itself). > > Solution offers itself. Make it darker and make the colours more > vibrant, or take the one from guidelines and work a little on the > gradients if you think it is too dark. > > Martin i could redo all the folder icons in the same colors as this box of mine ^_^ than it will fit in echo. but seriously. the current package icon is way to dark.. and if you make the comparison than please do it with the new globe you made (the one with the stars(?) in it) than it might fit better. _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list <a href="mailto:Fedora-art-list@redhat.com">Fedora-art-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list"> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list</a> </blockquote></div> Leave the folders alone! They're alive, full of live, colors. Your box looks dead :> . -- Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek <a href="http://liviopl.jogger.pl/">http://liviopl.jogger.pl/</a>