<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <blockquote cite="mid:20080404191545.E9BE48E00CD@hormel.redhat.com" type="cite"> <hr size="4" width="90%"> Max Spevack wrote: <blockquote type="cite">On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote: <blockquote type="cite">I think the one with the pru in it (design #1) is better. You could consider it final I think. The only concern is that it's derived from a Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic photo. Is that okay? If not I can probably go out and shoot some photos of the skyline and redo this weekend. </blockquote> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/</a> So we're not going to sell the shirts and admission to FUDCon is free, which means that it's not "commercial". </blockquote> Well the "non-commercial" clause in the CC licenses are problematic for various reasons including the issue of defining what exactly is considered commercial activity. I think using a different picture that allows commercial activity is better. Rahul <pre wrap=""> If pics of Boston and surounding ares is need, I can easily shoot in take some pics, I live about 15 miles south of the city, so it only takes about 1/2 an hour to get there, and I could go and take a bunch of shots from all over the city if you guys would like. </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>