From fitzsim at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 16:09:50 2006 From: fitzsim at redhat.com (Thomas Fitzsimmons) Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:09:50 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-plugin commented out Message-ID: <44F85B4E.2030606@redhat.com> Hi, the java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-plugin package was a good preview of things to come for FC6test2, but GNU Classpath's security implementation is still too immature for the plugin to be loaded by Firefox by default. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204728 I've commented out java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-plugin from java-1.4.2-gcj-compat, and made the latest java-1.4.2-gcj-compat obsolete java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-plugin <= 1.4.2.0-40jpp.104, so the plugin will not be loaded by Firefox by default. java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-plugin installed a symlink from /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so to /usr/lib/gcj-4.1.1/libgcjwebplugin.so. The latter is owned by the libgcj RPM. My plan was to continue to install /usr/lib/gcj-4.1.1/libgcjwebplugin.so (without installing any symlinks, so that Firefox would not load the plugin by default), so that adventurous users could still do: cd ~/.mozilla/plugins ln -s /usr/lib/gcj-4.1.1/libgcjwebplugin.so . There would still be the security warning dialog asking whether or not to load a given applet. What do people think of this plan? Tom From aph at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 16:15:30 2006 From: aph at redhat.com (Andrew Haley) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:15:30 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-plugin commented out In-Reply-To: <44F85B4E.2030606@redhat.com> References: <44F85B4E.2030606@redhat.com> Message-ID: <17656.23714.933697.978978@zebedee.pink> Thomas Fitzsimmons writes: > My plan was to continue to install > /usr/lib/gcj-4.1.1/libgcjwebplugin.so (without installing any > symlinks, so that Firefox would not load the plugin by default), so > that adventurous users could still do: > > cd ~/.mozilla/plugins > ln -s /usr/lib/gcj-4.1.1/libgcjwebplugin.so . > > There would still be the security warning dialog asking whether or > not to load a given applet. > > What do people think of this plan? I think it's an excellent compromise. Andrew. From opensource at till.name Sat Sep 2 21:03:46 2006 From: opensource at till.name (Till Maas) Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 23:03:46 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] packaging freemind, anyone interested? Message-ID: <200609022304.00847.opensource@till.name> Hiyas, I want to ask if anyone here is interested in packaging freemind (http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page). I do not know whether or not it does run with fedora's free java but I am missing it from the time before I used fedora. This is why I want to ask if anyone here would be so kind and package it for fedora. It is a free mind-mapping software that in my eyes is the best free mind-mapping software currently available. Regards, Till -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From neugens at limasoftware.net Sun Sep 3 14:21:36 2006 From: neugens at limasoftware.net (Mario Torre) Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:21:36 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] packaging freemind, anyone interested? In-Reply-To: <200609022304.00847.opensource@till.name> References: <200609022304.00847.opensource@till.name> Message-ID: <1157293296.2800.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Il giorno sab, 02/09/2006 alle 23.03 +0200, Till Maas ha scritto: > Hiyas, > > I want to ask if anyone here is interested in packaging freemind > (http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page). I do not know > whether or not it does run with fedora's free java but I am missing it from > the time before I used fedora. This is why I want to ask if anyone here would > be so kind and package it for fedora. It is a free mind-mapping software that > in my eyes is the best free mind-mapping software currently available. > Hi! Last time I checked (classpath cvs of a couple of days ago, with cacao and jamvm), it did not worked well (the application was quite unisable).. It may be a problem of the current cvs though, as it seem to introduce some regressions (I still have to check carefully but even flickrbackup does not run anymore). I would suggest to give a look at xebece (http://xebece.sourceforge.net/), also :) Ciao, Mario -- Lima Software, SO.PR.IND. s.r.l. http://www.limasoftware.net/ pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org Please, support open standards: http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Questa ? una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente URL: From mark at klomp.org Mon Sep 4 07:28:24 2006 From: mark at klomp.org (Mark Wielaard) Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:28:24 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] packaging freemind, anyone interested? In-Reply-To: <1157293296.2800.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200609022304.00847.opensource@till.name> <1157293296.2800.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1157354905.2965.70.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 16:21 +0200, Mario Torre wrote: > Il giorno sab, 02/09/2006 alle 23.03 +0200, Till Maas ha scritto: > > Hiyas, > > > > I want to ask if anyone here is interested in packaging freemind > > (http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page). I do not know > > whether or not it does run with fedora's free java but I am missing it from > > the time before I used fedora. This is why I want to ask if anyone here would > > be so kind and package it for fedora. It is a free mind-mapping software that > > in my eyes is the best free mind-mapping software currently available. > > > Last time I checked (classpath cvs of a couple of days ago, with cacao > and jamvm), it did not worked well (the application was quite > unisable).. It may be a problem of the current cvs though, as it seem to > introduce some regressions (I still have to check carefully but even > flickrbackup does not run anymore). You probably need this patch that restores HTML support in free swing widgets: 2006-09-01 Roman Kennke PR 28922 * javax/swing/plaf/basic/BasicHTML.java (HTMLRootView.getAttributes): Overridden to return null. (HTMLRootView.getElement): Overridden to return the view's element. Freemind does startup and run with the gcj included in FC6t3 (out any day now). http://gnu.wildebeest.org/diary/index.php?p=160 But it is not 100% there yet, some of the HTML support is being worked on atm. Cheers, Mark From bkonrath at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 02:24:09 2006 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:24:09 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] using eclipse in rawhide Message-ID: <1157423049.19837.38.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> Hi, Eclipse in rawhide isn't working because of what seems to be a firefox bug [1]. A temporary work-around is to replace /usr/lib/eclipse/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3232.so with the one included included in the upstream binary: http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/*checkout*/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86/Attic/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3232.so?rev=1.2&only_with_tag=v3232m&content-type=application/octet-stream You won't be able to use the embedded browser but you should be able to use everything else. Cheers, Ben [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201778 From kwade at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:48:17 2006 From: kwade at redhat.com (Karsten Wade) Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:48:17 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my! Message-ID: <1157503697.22766.53.camel@erato.phig.org> Can someone give fedora-docs-list an update about our ability to put out a 100% free, gcj-compiled DocBook toolchain? I've totally lost track of where this is at or who was working on it. Thanks - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fitzsim at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 14:37:20 2006 From: fitzsim at redhat.com (Thomas Fitzsimmons) Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:37:20 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my! In-Reply-To: <1157503697.22766.53.camel@erato.phig.org> References: <1157503697.22766.53.camel@erato.phig.org> Message-ID: <45002EA0.3090907@redhat.com> Hi Karsten! Karsten Wade wrote: > Can someone give fedora-docs-list an update about our ability to put out > a 100% free, gcj-compiled DocBook toolchain? I've been meaning to test this against Rawhide but haven't got to it yet. When I do, I'll report the status here. (I have a feeling there will have been improvements because of the Java2D work in GNU Classpath). Tom From bkonrath at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:30:43 2006 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 15:30:43 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 Message-ID: <1157657443.1329.10.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> Hey y'all, I whipped up a little test yum repo with Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 (i386 and x86_64): % cat /etc/yum.repos.d/eclipse.repo [eclipse] name=Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 baseurl=http://bagu.org/eclipse/3.2-FC-5/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 If you want to use this you'll have to remove all of the non-SDK Eclipse rpms because of version requirements. We may fix this in the near future. This is only a test repo to give a little preview of 3.2 running with GCJ for those of you who are not running rawhide. If people think it's a good idea, we don't mind officially releasing 3.2 and accompanying plugins into an FC-5 update. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. Cheers, Ben From fitzsim at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 19:05:35 2006 From: fitzsim at redhat.com (Thomas Fitzsimmons) Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:05:35 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] libgcjwebplugin.so security README Message-ID: <4501BEFF.4010006@redhat.com> Hi Jakub, Mark Cox asked me to write a README about the security risks of using gcjwebplugin, for inclusion in the libgcj RPM. Can you include this in Rawhide gcc's doc directory? I also realized that gappletviewer wasn't warning people that it runs without a security manager, so I wrote a patch that issues a warning on startup and asks the user if they want to continue. Can it be applied to the Rawhide gcc rpm? Tom, if we do go with the separate libgcj rpm, these will need to be applied there. Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: README.libgcjwebplugin.so Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2434 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tools-gappletviewer-warning.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2299 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tromey at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 21:51:40 2006 From: tromey at redhat.com (Tom Tromey) Date: 08 Sep 2006 15:51:40 -0600 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: libgcjwebplugin.so security README In-Reply-To: <4501BEFF.4010006@redhat.com> References: <4501BEFF.4010006@redhat.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons writes: Tom> I also realized that gappletviewer wasn't warning people that it runs Tom> without a security manager, so I wrote a patch that issues a warning Tom> on startup and asks the user if they want to continue. Can it be Tom> applied to the Rawhide gcc rpm? I think the current approach is to check changes like this in on the rh 4.1 branch in gcc svn. At least, I pulled some fixes over to that branch recently... Tom> Tom, if we do go with the separate libgcj rpm, these will need to be Tom> applied there. Understood, thanks. Tom From fitzsim at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 22:16:57 2006 From: fitzsim at redhat.com (Thomas Fitzsimmons) Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:16:57 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: libgcjwebplugin.so security README In-Reply-To: References: <4501BEFF.4010006@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4501EBD9.7090000@redhat.com> Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons writes: > > Tom> I also realized that gappletviewer wasn't warning people that it runs > Tom> without a security manager, so I wrote a patch that issues a warning > Tom> on startup and asks the user if they want to continue. Can it be > Tom> applied to the Rawhide gcc rpm? > > I think the current approach is to check changes like this in on the > rh 4.1 branch in gcc svn. OK, done. I didn't commit the README on the branch though, so it still must be added to the rpm manually. Tom From raif at swiftdsl.com.au Sat Sep 9 05:59:50 2006 From: raif at swiftdsl.com.au (Raif S. Naffah) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:59:50 +1000 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 In-Reply-To: <1157657443.1329.10.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> References: <1157657443.1329.10.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200609091559.59130.raif@swiftdsl.com.au> hello Ben, On Friday 08 September 2006 05:30, Ben Konrath wrote: > ... > I whipped up a little test yum repo with Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 (i386 and > x86_64)... > ...If people think it's a > good idea, we don't mind officially releasing 3.2 and accompanying > plugins into an FC-5 update. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. it's a great idea! cheers; rsn -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From vikramrc at yahoo.com Sat Sep 9 06:32:02 2006 From: vikramrc at yahoo.com (Vikram Roopchand) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 23:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-java] j-Interop: Open Source , Non Native access to DCOM Message-ID: <20060909063202.73931.qmail@web53002.mail.yahoo.com> For anyone interested: j-Interop implements DCOM wire protocol (MSRPC) to enable development of Pure Bi-Directional, Non-Native Java applications which can interoperate with any COM component.The implementation itself is purely in Java and does not use JNI to provide native access,thus being truly platform independent. It has full support for COM automation and supports callback from COM Servers (event handling). 1.04(a) has been tested on Fedora 5 and Windows XP/2K/2K3. Beta is expected out by second week of september. This release can be downloaded from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=174727 Thanks, best regards, Vikram --------------------------------- --------------------------------- --------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger?s low PC-to-Phone call rates. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aaron at luchko.ca Tue Sep 12 03:25:21 2006 From: aaron at luchko.ca (Aaron Luchko) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:25:21 -0600 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 In-Reply-To: <1157657443.1329.10.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> References: <1157657443.1329.10.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1158031521.2868.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 15:30 -0400, Ben Konrath wrote: > Hey y'all, > > I whipped up a little test yum repo with Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 (i386 and > x86_64): > This is only a test repo to give a little preview of 3.2 running with > GCJ for those of you who are not running rawhide. If people think it's a > good idea, we don't mind officially releasing 3.2 and accompanying > plugins into an FC-5 update. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. Awesome, up till now I've needed to use upstream eclipse to be able to use 3.2 but now I can switch back to fedora eclipse. I'd definitely be in favour of updating the eclipse packages to 3.2. One minor nitpick with these packages though, the update sites listed in the update manager were from 3.1, I had to export the update sites from an upstream download in 3.2 and import them into this version to be able to install 3.2 updates. I think the problem is in /usr/share/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.sdk_3.2.0.v20060609m-GpOJnQq-7es-zhF/feature.xml a diff with upstream shows - - + + + On a side, and decidedly unrelated to java, note it would nice if there was some supported way of installing different versions of packages with yum other than installing from rawhide and possibly needing a massive pile of other dependencies. Something like a fedora-beta or yum --getVersion flag that lets someone get a development version of the package (like eclipse 3.2) with a minimal set of dependencies. I just think of the number of times I've needed to install a fairly stable beta of some application to my home directory because even if there was an rpm there would be too many broken dependencies in updating it. Of course, I say this as someone who wouldn't have to do the packaging or chase down bugs popping up in all the different configurations :) Aaron From jdesbonnet at gmail.com Tue Sep 12 11:37:46 2006 From: jdesbonnet at gmail.com (Joe Desbonnet) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:37:46 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Eclipse TPTP Message-ID: <1cef3e950609120437s4b6a2024tc546dfa939894a8f@mail.gmail.com> I am having difficulty getting the Eclipse 3.2 TPTP recording feature working on Fedora. It "just works" on Windows with IE browser. I get IWAT0248E The agent controller is not available on host localhost. Make sure that: * the agent controller is installed * the agent controller is configured to communicate with your machine * you have the corrent host name and port number for the agent controller I tried downloading a native Agent Controller -- but it seems FC5 has the wong libstdc++ library. However it my understanding that the native version should not be necessary. Interestingly I get similar errors if I try using to use the Firefox browser on Windows. Is there any magic to getting this to work with Fedora + Firefox? I'm using the Sun JDK (1.5.0_07). Joe. From tla-ml at rasmil.dk Wed Sep 13 07:59:49 2006 From: tla-ml at rasmil.dk (Tim Lauridsen) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:59:49 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] subclipse svn checkout fails. Message-ID: <4507BA75.6050301@rasmil.dk> Hi. I have installed the latest eclipse and eclipse-subclipse on my rawhide system. (FC6T2 + Rawhide update) The i try to checkout out a svn project from https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/yumex/trunk. I get the following error: An internal error occured during: "Fetching Childred of https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/yumex/trunk" 1.4 Methods not enabled. I have no problems doing a checkout on the commandline (svn co https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/yumex/trunk) *Installed eclipse & subversion packages:* [tim at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep eclipse eclipse-ecj-3.2.0-5.fc6 eclipse-subclipse-book-1.1.5-2.fc6 eclipse-platform-3.2.0-5.fc6 eclipse-rcp-3.2.0-5.fc6 eclipse-subclipse-1.1.5-2.fc6 [tim at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep svn javasvn-1.1.0-0.3.beta4.fc6 [tim at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep subversion subversion-javahl-1.3.2-6 subversion-1.3.2-6 Anybody have any ideas about what goes wrong. Shall i make a bugzilla against eclipse-subclipse or is the problem releated to eclipse ??? Tim Lauridsen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arunpsadanandan at yahoo.com Wed Sep 13 13:25:19 2006 From: arunpsadanandan at yahoo.com (arun sadanandan) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-java] How to acquire the memory status of a system with java In-Reply-To: <20060912160025.7CAE273574@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20060913132519.48408.qmail@web32509.mail.mud.yahoo.com> hi, I am doing a project in Enterprise java for developing a "parallel procesing platform".During the development stages of this I have stucked with the problem how to detect the present load status of each of the machines in the network with java coding.Or is there any better alternatives for the remote load analysis.I would like to develope it independent of the client's OS ie why I prefer the way to be purely java oriented. Also I am facing another problem with detecting which are the machines currently alive in the network.Is there any solution either purely java or by using any other tools that can be implemented via java. If any body could help me, It will be a greate favour for me. Arun P sadanandan A Final year gratuation student in computer science --------------------------------- Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1?/min. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From overholt at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 10:43:05 2006 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:43:05 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] subclipse svn checkout fails. In-Reply-To: <4507BA75.6050301@rasmil.dk> References: <4507BA75.6050301@rasmil.dk> Message-ID: <1158144185.19095.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2006-13-09 at 09:59 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > Shall i make a bugzilla against eclipse-subclipse or is the problem > releated to eclipse ??? File a bug against eclipse-subclipse and we can move it if necessary. I'll try to take a look at this on Friday (I'm out of town right now) but filing it now means Robert can perhaps take a look at it. Thanks, Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From cagney at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 16:06:44 2006 From: cagney at redhat.com (Andrew Cagney) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:06:44 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] How to acquire the memory status of a system with java In-Reply-To: <20060913132519.48408.qmail@web32509.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060913132519.48408.qmail@web32509.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <45082C94.8020207@redhat.com> Arun, Can I suggest looking at frysk's framework: http://sourceware.org/frysk it lets you access much of the system information from java, and we're more than interested in extending this. Andrew arun sadanandan wrote: > hi, > I am doing a project in Enterprise java for developing a > "parallel procesing platform".During the development stages of this I > have stucked with the problem *how to detect the present load status > of each of the machines in the network with java coding.*Or is there > any better alternatives for the remote load analysis.I would like to > develope it independent of the client's OS* ie why I prefer the way > to be purely java oriented*. > Also I am facing another problem with > detecting which are the machines currently alive in the network.Is > there any solution either purely java or by using any other tools that > can be implemented via java. > If any body could help me, It will be a greate > favour for me. > > *Arun P sadanandan* > A Final year gratuation > student in computer science > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great > rates starting at 1?/min. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list > From bkonrath at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 17:24:38 2006 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:24:38 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 In-Reply-To: <1158031521.2868.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1157657443.1329.10.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> <1158031521.2868.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1158168279.2689.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2006-11-09 at 21:25 -0600, Aaron Luchko wrote: > One minor nitpick with these packages though, the update sites listed in > the update manager were from 3.1, I had to export the update sites from > an upstream download in 3.2 and import them into this version to be able > to install 3.2 updates. I think the problem is in > /usr/share/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.sdk_3.2.0.v20060609m-GpOJnQq-7es-zhF/feature.xml > a diff with upstream shows > > > - url="http://update.eclipse.org/updates/3.1"/> > - url="http://update.eclipse.org/updates/3.1"/> > + url="http://update.eclipse.org/updates/3.2"/> > + url="http://update.eclipse.org/updates/3.2"/> > + url="http://download.eclipse.org/callisto/releases"/> > Thanks. Here's the bug if you're interested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205933 I looked into this the other day and I think we can get rid of the script if I re-organize files list. Expect a fix in the next couple of days. > On a side, and decidedly unrelated to java, note it would nice if there > was some supported way of installing different versions of packages with > yum other than installing from rawhide and possibly needing a massive > pile of other dependencies. Something like a fedora-beta or yum > --getVersion flag that lets someone get a development version of the > package (like eclipse 3.2) with a minimal set of dependencies. I just > think of the number of times I've needed to install a fairly stable beta > of some application to my home directory because even if there was an > rpm there would be too many broken dependencies in updating it. > > Of course, I say this as someone who wouldn't have to do the packaging > or chase down bugs popping up in all the different configurations :) Another problem is that packages compiled with a newer compiler will not always work on the older system. Ben From mark at klomp.org Thu Sep 14 08:45:53 2006 From: mark at klomp.org (Mark Wielaard) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:45:53 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my! In-Reply-To: <45002EA0.3090907@redhat.com> References: <1157503697.22766.53.camel@erato.phig.org> <45002EA0.3090907@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1158223553.3236.14.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 10:37 -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: > Hi Karsten! > > Karsten Wade wrote: > > Can someone give fedora-docs-list an update about our ability to put out > > a 100% free, gcj-compiled DocBook toolchain? > > I've been meaning to test this against Rawhide but haven't got to it yet. When > I do, I'll report the status here. (I have a feeling there will have been > improvements because of the Java2D work in GNU Classpath). Yes, I have CCed Cameron and Francis who might have the most up to date status on all this. If we have a good description of what really must work then we can concentrate on those parts of gcj, classpath, batik and fop that are essential to the documentation team. I installed FC6test3, but cannot find the fop package that Tom created (or did I only dream that he did? maybe it was never submitted?). We might need to import/backport some recent classpath CVS fixes into the FC6 libgcj to make it all work since I know just days ago some new support for batik went into GNU Classpath (hi Francis, hi Cameron). Cheers, Mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From cam at mcc.id.au Thu Sep 14 09:21:00 2006 From: cam at mcc.id.au (Cameron McCormack) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:21:00 +1000 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my! In-Reply-To: <1158223553.3236.14.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> References: <1157503697.22766.53.camel@erato.phig.org> <45002EA0.3090907@redhat.com> <1158223553.3236.14.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Message-ID: <20060914092059.GA2775@port.mcc.id.au> Hi people. Karsten Wade: > > > Can someone give fedora-docs-list an update about our ability to put out > > > a 100% free, gcj-compiled DocBook toolchain? Thomas Fitzsimmons: > > I've been meaning to test this against Rawhide but haven't got to it yet. When > > I do, I'll report the status here. (I have a feeling there will have been > > improvements because of the Java2D work in GNU Classpath). Mark Wielaard: > Yes, I have CCed Cameron and Francis who might have the most up to date > status on all this. If we have a good description of what really must > work then we can concentrate on those parts of gcj, classpath, batik and > fop that are essential to the documentation team. > > I installed FC6test3, but cannot find the fop package that Tom created > (or did I only dream that he did? maybe it was never submitted?). We > might need to import/backport some recent classpath CVS fixes into the > FC6 libgcj to make it all work since I know just days ago some new > support for batik went into GNU Classpath (hi Francis, hi Cameron). Yes, I?ve just last week started to try to identify what Classpath problems are preventing Batik from working. Since the Fedora people will (presumably) only be interested in rasterising static SVG documents, this should avoid having to deal with any Swing issues just yet. We are collecting the issues regarding FOP and Batik here: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics/GnuClasspathCompatibility One thing I have noticed during my limited testing so far is that the rasteriser (and the SVG browser, too) is running pretty slowly compared to on Sun?s JVM. My first guess would be a mismatch of ColorModels between what Batik is providing and what the Cairo layer underneath is exepcting (which was a problem for Batik running under Sun?s OSX JVM a while ago), but I haven?t checked into this yet. Some simple files work, others don?t. I really have to do some more testing before knowing which areas need to be looked at. I will report back (and update the wiki page above) when I have found out more. If the Fedora documentation people want to provide examples of the kinds of things they will be processing, that would help to prioritise the work. I am not sure about the state of FOP running with Classpath. Jeremias M?rki (CC?d) should know more. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:heycam at jabber.org ? ICQ 26955922 ? MSN cam at mcc.id.au From fitzsim at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 13:56:31 2006 From: fitzsim at redhat.com (Thomas Fitzsimmons) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:56:31 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my! In-Reply-To: <1158223553.3236.14.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> References: <1157503697.22766.53.camel@erato.phig.org> <45002EA0.3090907@redhat.com> <1158223553.3236.14.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Message-ID: <45095F8F.5080007@redhat.com> Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 10:37 -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: >> Hi Karsten! >> >> Karsten Wade wrote: >>> Can someone give fedora-docs-list an update about our ability to put out >>> a 100% free, gcj-compiled DocBook toolchain? >> I've been meaning to test this against Rawhide but haven't got to it yet. When >> I do, I'll report the status here. (I have a feeling there will have been >> improvements because of the Java2D work in GNU Classpath). > > Yes, I have CCed Cameron and Francis who might have the most up to date > status on all this. If we have a good description of what really must > work then we can concentrate on those parts of gcj, classpath, batik and > fop that are essential to the documentation team. > > I installed FC6test3, but cannot find the fop package that Tom created > (or did I only dream that he did? maybe it was never submitted?). Yes, I never submitted my packages as they were major hacks. Building Batik from the JPackage RPMs is not really feasible, because of the web of dependencies (rhino brings in many), the worst one being maven. None of these dependencies are packaged in FC or FE. On the FOP front, the FOP developers have done work in CVS to eliminate com.sun dependencies, work that hasn't been released and packaged yet. I'd recommend building Batik and FOP from CVS if you're trying these out since then you can configure out the rhino dependency, and so you're working with the updated FOP. Tom From fkung at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 14:37:52 2006 From: fkung at redhat.com (Francis Kung) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:37:52 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my! In-Reply-To: <20060914092059.GA2775@port.mcc.id.au> References: <1157503697.22766.53.camel@erato.phig.org> <45002EA0.3090907@redhat.com> <1158223553.3236.14.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <20060914092059.GA2775@port.mcc.id.au> Message-ID: <1158244672.12454.161.camel@toddy.toronto.redhat.com> Hi, > Yes, I?ve just last week started to try to identify what Classpath > problems are preventing Batik from working. Since the Fedora people will > (presumably) only be interested in rasterising static SVG documents, > this should avoid having to deal with any Swing issues just yet. > > We are collecting the issues regarding FOP and Batik here: > > http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics/GnuClasspathCompatibility 22938 - java.awt.BasicStroke.createStrokedShape unfinished is also done; I committed a patch for it a couple of months ago, but the ticket hasn't been closed yet (waiting for some feedback). > One thing I have noticed during my limited testing so far is that the > rasteriser (and the SVG browser, too) is running pretty slowly compared > to on Sun?s JVM. My first guess would be a mismatch of ColorModels > between what Batik is providing and what the Cairo layer underneath is > exepcting (which was a problem for Batik running under Sun?s OSX JVM a > while ago), but I haven?t checked into this yet. AFAIK, we pass everything to Cairo in premultiplied ARGB32 for image data, if that helps. I've also run across some problems recently with our ARGB implementation, mostly with the ordering of bands (resulting in weird discolouration), but that doesn't sound related... > Some simple files work, others don?t. I really have to do some more > testing before knowing which areas need to be looked at. I will report > back (and update the wiki page above) when I have found out more. I'll wait to hear. Cheers, Francis From kwade at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 08:59:56 2006 From: kwade at redhat.com (Karsten Wade) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:59:56 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my! In-Reply-To: <20060914092059.GA2775@port.mcc.id.au> References: <1157503697.22766.53.camel@erato.phig.org> <45002EA0.3090907@redhat.com> <1158223553.3236.14.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <20060914092059.GA2775@port.mcc.id.au> Message-ID: <1158310796.8230.71.camel@erato.phig.org> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 19:21 +1000, Cameron McCormack wrote: > Hi people. Hi Cameron: I'm going to leave your reply intact below, just dropping a note that I sent a separate message to fedora-docs-list summarizing the thread so far and calling attention to what we can do to help. Of the tools-herders, some are busy with test3 packaging, but we certainly must have some people with documents they want to test (into PDFs). I'll keep both lists informed, for now. Thanks, Karsten > Karsten Wade: > > > > Can someone give fedora-docs-list an update about our ability to put out > > > > a 100% free, gcj-compiled DocBook toolchain? > > Thomas Fitzsimmons: > > > I've been meaning to test this against Rawhide but haven't got to it yet. When > > > I do, I'll report the status here. (I have a feeling there will have been > > > improvements because of the Java2D work in GNU Classpath). > > Mark Wielaard: > > Yes, I have CCed Cameron and Francis who might have the most up to date > > status on all this. If we have a good description of what really must > > work then we can concentrate on those parts of gcj, classpath, batik and > > fop that are essential to the documentation team. > > > > I installed FC6test3, but cannot find the fop package that Tom created > > (or did I only dream that he did? maybe it was never submitted?). We > > might need to import/backport some recent classpath CVS fixes into the > > FC6 libgcj to make it all work since I know just days ago some new > > support for batik went into GNU Classpath (hi Francis, hi Cameron). > > Yes, I?ve just last week started to try to identify what Classpath > problems are preventing Batik from working. Since the Fedora people will > (presumably) only be interested in rasterising static SVG documents, > this should avoid having to deal with any Swing issues just yet. > > We are collecting the issues regarding FOP and Batik here: > > http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics/GnuClasspathCompatibility > > One thing I have noticed during my limited testing so far is that the > rasteriser (and the SVG browser, too) is running pretty slowly compared > to on Sun?s JVM. My first guess would be a mismatch of ColorModels > between what Batik is providing and what the Cairo layer underneath is > exepcting (which was a problem for Batik running under Sun?s OSX JVM a > while ago), but I haven?t checked into this yet. > > Some simple files work, others don?t. I really have to do some more > testing before knowing which areas need to be looked at. I will report > back (and update the wiki page above) when I have found out more. > > If the Fedora documentation people want to provide examples of the kinds > of things they will be processing, that would help to prioritise the > work. > > I am not sure about the state of FOP running with Classpath. Jeremias > M?rki (CC?d) should know more. > > Thanks, > > Cameron > -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From kwade at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 14:34:49 2006 From: kwade at redhat.com (Karsten Wade) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:34:49 -0700 Subject: [Fwd: Re: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my!] Message-ID: <1158330890.8230.98.camel@erato.phig.org> FYI, we have a need for some help in compiling FOP with gcj. This is a prerequisite to getting FOP support in xmlto. For details from Tommy, see below. thx - Karsten -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Tommy Reynolds Reply-To: For participants of the Documentation Project To: fedora-docs-list at redhat.com Subject: Re: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my! Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:16:47 -0700 Uttered Karsten Wade , spake thus: > Tommy - is the barrier to having make run the Java tools the lack of > support in xmlto? If we're this close, maybe we can get xmlto updated > in the devel tree (rawhide) right away. Bonus would be if we could see > all of this pushed eventually into updates to FCs 5 and 6. Karsten, I've had XMLTO working with FOP, and producing PDF's, for quite a while now. As Paul W Frields as pointed out, the PDF's look awful because we need work on the stylesheet. As you probably remember, I sent the appropriate XMLTO patches for FOP to Tim Waugh many, many moons ago. AIUI, his reluctance to add them officially has been mostly that FOP wasn't free. The FOP dependancy in the XMLTO RPM would be endlessly confusing. If needed I could mangle the patches to use either FOP or passivetex so as not to break things while our FOP implementation matures, with the default renderer being passivetex. These are just minor details. I lack the java-fu to compile FOP using gcj; if someone could do it for me, and maybe send me the patches, I could provide Tim a with a complete package. In summary: 1) If we could get someone to provide patches to compile FOP using gcj, I could do the RPM-fu. 2) Having hopes of a FOP rpm, I can update the XMLTO rpm to utilize it. 3) Present Tim Waugh with a fait acompli. I'm not sure that #3 is sufficient to get the updates into rawhide, but it's a necessary step. Cheers -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list at redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Tue Sep 19 21:21:25 2006 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:21:25 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Extras submission - classpath-0.92 Message-ID: <1158700885.3845.72.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, This is my first java package submitted to fedora extras and it's been suggested on #fedora-java that this would be the best place to talk about it. Please remember that though I've submitted quite a lot of packages for various languages to FE, this is my first java one so if I seem kinda dumb or ask blindingly obvious questions, this is the reason. If you point your browsers to BZ#207077 you will see that I've submitted GNU classpath-0.92 for inclusion. The discussion on #fedora-java is that libgcj is roughly equal to a version of classpath. However, when I've come to compile ikvm (already in FE, though as a compiled binary only) or Limewire, libgcj can't hack it, but classpath-0.92 just did the business and everything compiled. Am I widdling into the wind by submitting this or is libgcj just that bit too far from classpath-0.92? Second to this is a packaging problem. Most of classpath goes straight into %{_libdir}, but two files are directed to /usr/lib (a logging and a security file). Is this the correct behaviour, or should I patch to ensure everything goes to the correct %{_libdir}? TTFN Paul -- "Der einzige Weg, Leute zu kontrollieren ist sie anzul?gen" - L. Ron "Ich kann kein Science-Fiction schreiben" Hubbard; L?gner, Betr?ger, Fixer und Wohlt?ter zu niemandem -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From green at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:22:37 2006 From: green at redhat.com (Anthony Green) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:22:37 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Extras submission - classpath-0.92 In-Reply-To: <1158700885.3845.72.camel@T7.Linux> References: <1158700885.3845.72.camel@T7.Linux> Message-ID: <1158704557.2673.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 22:21 +0100, Paul wrote: > Am I widdling into the wind by submitting this or is libgcj just that > bit too far from classpath-0.92? libgcj will not work if what you want is a runtime for IKVM or similar. That being said, I'm not sure it makes sense to build and install GNU Classpath independently from another JVM project. I think we want JRE projects and related technology to get installed using the JPackage alternatives system. Can you describe your GNU Classpath use-cases a little more? For instance... you're building Limewire with what? And to run on what JRE? AG From david at zarb.org Tue Sep 19 22:39:02 2006 From: david at zarb.org (David Walluck) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:39:02 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Extras submission - classpath-0.92 In-Reply-To: <1158704557.2673.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1158700885.3845.72.camel@T7.Linux> <1158704557.2673.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <45107186.6030600@zarb.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anthony Green wrote: > libgcj will not work if what you want is a runtime for IKVM or similar. > That being said, I'm not sure it makes sense to build and install GNU > Classpath independently from another JVM project. I think we want JRE As far as I know, ikvm unfortunately bundles classpath. Unfortunately, I do not think the standalone classpath will work with it. > projects and related technology to get installed using the JPackage > alternatives system. Can you describe your GNU Classpath use-cases a > little more? For instance... you're building Limewire with what? And > to run on what JRE? cacao and jamvm can use (share) the standalone classpath. Sometimes, an updated glibj.zip is useful just for building (API stubs), and sometimes also for running (although less often). I cannot speak for Paul's particular use case, but this has been my general experience. In any case, the use of classpath has nothing to do with the ability to set up the cacao and jamvm JVM's to use the JPackage alternatives system (I have done it). As for ikvm, the story is more complicated, because although it can run Java programs, neither the layout or the tools it provides are the same as what would be included in the JDK. - -- Sincerely, David Walluck -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFEHGGN5thZBYlTwkRAhSLAJ46qGLEjaw3E73TxC7o9JhzWfkvCACcDR+z U2ipPomrYVjT1+m3nXi8xbk= =Jjcp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Tue Sep 19 22:31:25 2006 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:31:25 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Extras submission - classpath-0.92 In-Reply-To: <1158704557.2673.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1158700885.3845.72.camel@T7.Linux> <1158704557.2673.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1158705085.3845.79.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, > > Am I widdling into the wind by submitting this or is libgcj just that > > bit too far from classpath-0.92? > > libgcj will not work if what you want is a runtime for IKVM or similar. That's what I thought when I was speaking with the ikvm guys > That being said, I'm not sure it makes sense to build and install GNU > Classpath independently from another JVM project. I think we want JRE > projects and related technology to get installed using the JPackage > alternatives system. Can you describe your GNU Classpath use-cases a > little more? For instance... you're building Limewire with what? And > to run on what JRE? I'm building limewire against classpath. It should run on the same JVM that OOo runs on (gcj IIRC). ikvm needs classpath to build happily As it stands, ikvm is my top priority as it's currently breaking the FE packaging rules of being a binary only package (it was accepted in like this). Limewire would be nice, but it's a big package and I doubt will be that simple to build. TTFN Paul -- "Der einzige Weg, Leute zu kontrollieren ist sie anzul?gen" - L. Ron "Ich kann kein Science-Fiction schreiben" Hubbard; L?gner, Betr?ger, Fixer und Wohlt?ter zu niemandem -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Tue Sep 19 22:48:35 2006 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:48:35 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Extras submission - classpath-0.92 In-Reply-To: <45107186.6030600@zarb.org> References: <1158700885.3845.72.camel@T7.Linux> <1158704557.2673.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45107186.6030600@zarb.org> Message-ID: <1158706115.3845.83.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, > > libgcj will not work if what you want is a runtime for IKVM or similar. > > > That being said, I'm not sure it makes sense to build and install GNU > > Classpath independently from another JVM project. I think we want JRE > > As far as I know, ikvm unfortunately bundles classpath. Unfortunately, I > do not think the standalone classpath will work with it. From my understanding, you have to build against the standalone classpath. Unless something has changed between 0.28 and 0.30 that is which I was unaware of. I'm more interested in ikvm for use with monodevelop. > As for ikvm, the story is more complicated, because although it can run > Java programs, neither the layout or the tools it provides are the same > as what would be included in the JDK. ikvm really is only suited for use within the .NET framework (IMHO). TTFN Paul -- "Der einzige Weg, Leute zu kontrollieren ist sie anzul?gen" - L. Ron "Ich kann kein Science-Fiction schreiben" Hubbard; L?gner, Betr?ger, Fixer und Wohlt?ter zu niemandem -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From green at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 00:43:09 2006 From: green at redhat.com (Anthony Green) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:43:09 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Extras submission - classpath-0.92 In-Reply-To: <1158706115.3845.83.camel@T7.Linux> References: <1158700885.3845.72.camel@T7.Linux> <1158704557.2673.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45107186.6030600@zarb.org> <1158706115.3845.83.camel@T7.Linux> Message-ID: <1158712989.2673.89.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 23:48 +0100, Paul wrote: > > As far as I know, ikvm unfortunately bundles classpath. Unfortunately, I > > do not think the standalone classpath will work with it. > > From my understanding, you have to build against the standalone > classpath. Unless something has changed between 0.28 and 0.30 that is > which I was unaware of. I'm more interested in ikvm for use with > monodevelop. Do you mean to say that ikvm would BuildRequire gnu-classpath but not Require it? Like it generates a derivative .jar file or something? > > As for ikvm, the story is more complicated, because although it can run > > Java programs, neither the layout or the tools it provides are the same > > as what would be included in the JDK. > > ikvm really is only suited for use within the .NET framework (IMHO). Where does it look for security property files? How does it set the java.home property? AG From tromey at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 20:11:10 2006 From: tromey at redhat.com (Tom Tromey) Date: 20 Sep 2006 14:11:10 -0600 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora Extras submission - classpath-0.92 In-Reply-To: <1158705085.3845.79.camel@T7.Linux> References: <1158700885.3845.72.camel@T7.Linux> <1158704557.2673.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1158705085.3845.79.camel@T7.Linux> Message-ID: >>>>> "Paul" == Paul writes: Paul> I'm building limewire against classpath. It should run on the same JVM Paul> that OOo runs on (gcj IIRC). I would suggest trying to build it against the included gcj first. The FC6 libgcj is relatively up-to-date. If it doesn't build against libgcj there is some chance that it won't run on it anyway... and in that case we'd like to know what to pull in for a later update. Paul> ikvm needs classpath to build happily I thought IKVM included its own copy of Classpath. Tom From green at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 23:19:39 2006 From: green at redhat.com (Anthony Green) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:19:39 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] FC6 Release Notes for java Message-ID: <1158794379.24386.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> Help... the deadline for changes to the release notes is this Saturday, midnight UTC. Here are the current notes: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Java What else should we mention? Also, will libgcj be a separate SRPM in FC6? If so, is this still the right file name?: /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1.1/README.libgcjwebplugin.so AG From fitzsim at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 13:21:50 2006 From: fitzsim at redhat.com (Thomas Fitzsimmons) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:21:50 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FC6 Release Notes for java In-Reply-To: <1158794379.24386.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1158794379.24386.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <4513E36E.7090602@redhat.com> Hi, Anthony Green wrote: > Help... the deadline for changes to the release notes is this Saturday, > midnight UTC. > > Here are the current notes: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Java > > What else should we mention? > > Also, will libgcj be a separate SRPM in FC6? If so, is this still the > right file name?: /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1.1/README.libgcjwebplugin.so Good catch. I updated the pointer to be "/usr/share/doc/libgcj-4.1.1/README.libgcjwebplugin.so". Tom From vikramrc at yahoo.com Mon Sep 25 02:48:06 2006 From: vikramrc at yahoo.com (Vikram Roopchand) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-java] For j-Interop(Non-Native Java - COM Bridge) Developers In-Reply-To: <20060922160025.2F41D73732@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20060925024806.72317.qmail@web53002.mail.yahoo.com> Hello All, New Version 1.05(a) released:- 1) New Feature: Complete support for Manipulating Windows registry in a non native way. All create/read/update/delete operations supported. Please check the WinReg package. 2) New Feature: For inproc servers like DLLs and OCXs , and auto register feature has been provided, using this flag in JISystem\JIClsid\JIProgID class can result in the library making all the registry related changes required to run any Inproc server. It is done on the fly. Beta will be released next week. If anyone has any feature request, they can send the same to me till mid next week. Thanks to all developers for trying j-Interop. best regards, Vikram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tla-ml at rasmil.dk Thu Sep 28 13:20:08 2006 From: tla-ml at rasmil.dk (Tim Lauridsen) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:20:08 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] PyDev Eclipse Plugin Message-ID: <451BCC08.5080208@rasmil.dk> Anybody know the state of PyDev for Fedora Eclipse 3.2. Does there exist some test editions or someting, i would be very nice to do some python development in Eclipse again in FC6/Rawhide. Tim From overholt at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:34:36 2006 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:34:36 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] PyDev Eclipse Plugin In-Reply-To: <451BCC08.5080208@rasmil.dk> References: <451BCC08.5080208@rasmil.dk> Message-ID: <20060928143435.GA11287@redhat.com> * Tim Lauridsen [2006-09-28 10:06]: > Anybody know the state of PyDev for Fedora Eclipse 3.2. > Does there exist some test editions or someting, i would be very nice to > do some python development in Eclipse again in FC6/Rawhide. Igor Foox has been working on getting it into Fedor aExtras. He had to patch out all of the 1.5-isms to get it to work but once he was done with that it seemed to be okay. I'll le thim comment on the status. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: