From overholt at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 16:04:44 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:04:44 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Help to start contributing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090902160443.GA15270@redhat.com> Hi, > I\'m a software developer and want to contribute to projects on Java > in fedora. Great! Welcome. In Fedora, we generally direct people wishing to contribute to upstream communities. What areas are you interested in? Andrew From rossy.rocs at gmail.com Thu Sep 3 13:52:39 2009 From: rossy.rocs at gmail.com (Rossy Rocs) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:52:39 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] Help to start contributing Message-ID: Thanks Andrew. Actually I\'m a fresher and unaware of what areas I can work in. I\'m really eager to start contributing to, my favourite place, open source. Generally I like to work in backend. Please let me know what areas I can work in. regards, Rossy -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Overholt [mailto:overholt at redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:35 PM To: Rossy Rocs [mailto:rossy.rocs at gmail.com] Cc: fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Help to start contributing Hi, > I\\\'m a software developer and want to contribute to projects on Java > in fedora. Great! Welcome. In Fedora, we generally direct people wishing to contribute to upstream communities. What areas are you interested in? Andrew From overholt at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 13:53:51 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:53:51 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Help to start contributing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090903135350.GA5087@redhat.com> Hi, > Generally I like to work in backend. Please let me know what areas I > can work in. Backend Java, eh? Perhaps jboss.org would be a good place to start. Andrew From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Thu Sep 3 14:03:45 2009 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 14:03:45 +0000 Subject: [fedora-java] Help to start contributing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9497e9990909030703j430f7cf3k4af50012a1b2077a@mail.gmail.com> 2009/9/3 Rossy Rocs : > Thanks Andrew. > Actually I\'m a fresher and unaware of what areas I can work in. I\'m > really eager to start contributing to, my favourite place, open > source. > > Generally I like to work in backend. Please let me know what areas I > can work in. > > regards, > Rossy > Most people get involved in Fedora through package maintenance. If your favourite Java application is not included in Fedora, packaging it for inclusion in Fedora is an excellent way to get started. See this link for more information: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Contributing_roles If you want to do some actual Java coding, then Andrew's advice is good: Pick your favourite open source project and start submitting patches directly to them. :-) -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? From rossy.rocs at gmail.com Thu Sep 3 14:09:59 2009 From: rossy.rocs at gmail.com (Rossy Rocs) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:09:59 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] Help to start contributing Message-ID: >Backend Java, eh? Perhaps jboss.org would be a good place to start. Okay. Being at start, I think I\'d like to contribute in all ways I can using Java, C++ or shell script. What are the possible areas now? From akurtako at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:17:57 2009 From: akurtako at redhat.com (Alexander Kurtakov) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:17:57 +0300 Subject: [fedora-java] Help to start contributing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031717.57352.akurtako@redhat.com> > >Backend Java, eh? Perhaps jboss.org would be a good place to start. > > Okay. Being at start, I think I\'d like to contribute in all ways I > can using Java, C++ or shell script. > > What are the possible areas now? Can you join #fedora-java at irc.freenode.org so we can speak directly? Alex > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list From rossy.rocs at gmail.com Thu Sep 3 14:32:03 2009 From: rossy.rocs at gmail.com (Rossy Rocs) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:32:03 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] Help to start contributing Message-ID: Hi Alex, Currently I can\'t join in there. I\'ve to communicate through mails. Would appreciate the guidance. Please bare with me. From choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Sep 4 11:17:08 2009 From: choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de (Christoph =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6ger?=) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:17:08 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] ant contrib rpm not working? Message-ID: <1252063028.11249.7.camel@choeger6> Hi all, after installing ant-contrib, I cannot use it. I have: in my build.xml But as a result I do get a resource not found error. How am I supposed to use this thing rpm? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Sep 4 11:38:01 2009 From: choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de (Christoph =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6ger?=) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:38:01 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] ant contrib rpm not working? In-Reply-To: <200909041422.12356.akurtako@redhat.com> References: <1252063028.11249.7.camel@choeger6> <200909041422.12356.akurtako@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1252064281.11249.15.camel@choeger6> Am Freitag, den 04.09.2009, 14:22 +0300 schrieb Alexander Kurtakov: > > Hi all, > > > > after installing ant-contrib, I cannot use it. > > > > I have: > > > > > resource="net/sf/antcontrib/antlib.xml"/> > > > > in my build.xml > > > > But as a result I do get a resource not found error. > > > > How am I supposed to use this thing rpm? > > Do you have /usr/share/java/ant-contrib.jar on your classpath? That's the point. I always thought, /usr/share/java/* would be on the default classpath. Is that not the case? At least strace tells me that lots of jar files there are read. Setting CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/\* before invoking ant, does not work but dies with a strange exception, using CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/ant-contrib.jar works, but what is the point of doing that if I install a rpm file? Also I noticed that lots of ant rpms put their files into /usr/share/java/ant/ So do I really have to manage my CLASSPATH manually? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From akurtako at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 12:09:43 2009 From: akurtako at redhat.com (Alexander Kurtakov) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:09:43 +0300 Subject: [fedora-java] ant contrib rpm not working? In-Reply-To: <1252064281.11249.15.camel@choeger6> References: <1252063028.11249.7.camel@choeger6> <200909041422.12356.akurtako@redhat.com> <1252064281.11249.15.camel@choeger6> Message-ID: <200909041509.43939.akurtako@redhat.com> > Am Freitag, den 04.09.2009, 14:22 +0300 schrieb Alexander Kurtakov: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > after installing ant-contrib, I cannot use it. > > > > > > I have: > > > > > > > > resource="net/sf/antcontrib/antlib.xml"/> > > > > > > in my build.xml > > > > > > But as a result I do get a resource not found error. > > > > > > How am I supposed to use this thing rpm? > > > > Do you have /usr/share/java/ant-contrib.jar on your classpath? > > That's the point. I always thought, /usr/share/java/* would be on the > default classpath. Is that not the case? > > At least strace tells me that lots of jar files there are read. Setting > CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/\* before invoking ant, does not work but dies > with a strange exception, using > CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/ant-contrib.jar works, but what is the point > of doing that if I install a rpm file? > > Also I noticed that lots of ant rpms put their files > into /usr/share/java/ant/ So should ant-contrib. I've adopted it and will fix it for F-12. > > So do I really have to manage my CLASSPATH manually? When using rpm installed software No. Can you try whether http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1654610&name=ant- contrib-1.0-0.9.b2.fc12.noarch.rpm fixed the problem? Regards, Alex From choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Sep 4 13:01:54 2009 From: choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de (Christoph =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6ger?=) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:01:54 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] ant contrib rpm not working? In-Reply-To: <200909041509.43939.akurtako@redhat.com> References: <1252063028.11249.7.camel@choeger6> <200909041422.12356.akurtako@redhat.com> <1252064281.11249.15.camel@choeger6> <200909041509.43939.akurtako@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1252069314.2550.7.camel@choeger6> > > So do I really have to manage my CLASSPATH manually? > > When using rpm installed software No. > Can you try whether > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1654610&name=ant- > contrib-1.0-0.9.b2.fc12.noarch.rpm fixed the problem? No, it does not. But I also noticed the following (strace excerpt): [pid 4000] open("/usr/share/java/ant/ant-trax-1.7.1.jar", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 49 [pid 4000] open("/usr/share/java/xalan-j2-serializer-2.7.0.jar", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 50 [pid 4000] open("/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/lib/tools.jar", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 51 Buildfile: incrementalParser/src/build/ant/testcases.xml [pid 4000] open("/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-contrib.jar", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 52 [pid 4000] open("/home/choeger/dev/diplom/mf/incremental_page/incrementalParser/src/build/ant/testcases.xml", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 53 [taskdef] Could not load definitions from resource net/sf/antcontrib/antlib.xml. It could not be found. As you can see /usr/share/java/ant/ant-trax-1.7.1.jar is loaded automagically _before_ the build file is examined. This is what I assumed to be automagic classpathing. On the other hand you see that ant-contrib.jar is opened when it's put into /usr/share/ant/lib - but that does not help. Any ideas? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de Sat Sep 5 12:04:56 2009 From: choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de (Christoph =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6ger?=) Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:04:56 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] ant contrib rpm not working? In-Reply-To: <200909042200.17765.akurtako@redhat.com> References: <1252063028.11249.7.camel@choeger6> <200909041509.43939.akurtako@redhat.com> <1252069314.2550.7.camel@choeger6> <200909042200.17765.akurtako@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1252152296.2550.17.camel@choeger6> > Thanks for your investigation. It missed registerting in /etc/ant.d. Can you > try with http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1655507&name=ant- > contrib-1.0-0.10.b2.fc12.noarch.rpm ? Thanks for your efforts. Works like a charm! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de Mon Sep 7 11:41:32 2009 From: choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de (Christoph =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6ger?=) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:41:32 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] bsf-jython Message-ID: <1252323692.2540.5.camel@choeger6> Hi all, currently we are lacking a fedora version of the bsf jython engine. (I am in need of it for a ant script) It looks to me as if rebuilding bsf with version 2.4.0 and including a build requires on jython would be enough. I've testing compiling with `CLASSPATH=$(build-classpath jython) ant compile` and that worked well. (I do not think that subpackages would be any usefull at this point). Any comments on that? regards christoph ps: cc-ing the current maintainer to speed things up a little. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From overholt at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 12:26:09 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:26:09 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] bsf-jython In-Reply-To: <1252323692.2540.5.camel@choeger6> References: <1252323692.2540.5.camel@choeger6> Message-ID: <20090908122608.GA2829@redhat.com> Hi, * Christoph H?ger [2009-09-07 07:41]: > > It looks to me as if rebuilding bsf with version 2.4.0 and including a > build requires on jython would be enough. Sounds fine to me. Does anything strictly need bsf < 2.4.0? I realize nothing will have a strict Requires <= but we should at least try to build the direct packages that need bsf to verify that they still build with 2.4.0. Thanks, Andrew From choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de Tue Sep 8 15:51:08 2009 From: choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de (Christoph =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6ger?=) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:51:08 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] bsf-jython In-Reply-To: <20090908122608.GA2829@redhat.com> References: <1252323692.2540.5.camel@choeger6> <20090908122608.GA2829@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1252425068.2386.3.camel@choeger5.umpa.netz> Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2009, 08:26 -0400 schrieb Andrew Overholt: > Hi, > > * Christoph H?ger [2009-09-07 07:41]: > > > > It looks to me as if rebuilding bsf with version 2.4.0 and including a > > build requires on jython would be enough. > > Sounds fine to me. Does anything strictly need bsf < 2.4.0? I realize > nothing will have a strict Requires <= but we should at least try to > build the direct packages that need bsf to verify that they still build > with 2.4.0. So I will proceed by building bsf 2.4.0 for f11, ok? I just don't know if I should just rebuild any packages that depend on bsf ... Is there a way to inform the maintainers? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de Tue Sep 8 16:25:10 2009 From: choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de (Christoph =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6ger?=) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:25:10 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] bsf-jython In-Reply-To: <20090908155044.GF2829@redhat.com> References: <1252323692.2540.5.camel@choeger6> <20090908122608.GA2829@redhat.com> <1252425020.2386.2.camel@choeger5.umpa.netz> <20090908155044.GF2829@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1252427110.3970.25.camel@choeger5.umpa.netz> Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2009, 11:50 -0400 schrieb Andrew Overholt: > * Christoph H?ger [2009-09-08 11:50]: > > Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2009, 08:26 -0400 schrieb Andrew Overholt: > > > Hi, > > > > > > * Christoph H?ger [2009-09-07 07:41]: > > > > > > > > It looks to me as if rebuilding bsf with version 2.4.0 and including a > > > > build requires on jython would be enough. > > > > > > Sounds fine to me. Does anything strictly need bsf < 2.4.0? I realize > > > nothing will have a strict Requires <= but we should at least try to > > > build the direct packages that need bsf to verify that they still build > > > with 2.4.0. > > > > So I will proceed by building bsf 2.4.0 for f11, ok? > > I recommend doing a build for rawhide first. Of course. I wasn't sure that this is still possible. I always miss those frozen announcements. > > I just don't know if I should just rebuild any packages that depend on > > bsf ... Is there a way to inform the maintainers? > > You can use repoquery to see what Requires bsf and then use pkgdb or > ${pkgname}-owner at fedoraproject.org to email them. Good idea, those are only four packages. Somehow I cannot find ant-apache-bsf in the packagedb. It seems like pcheung is the only maintainer that needs to be notified. [choeger at choeger5 offlineimap]$ repoquery --whatrequires bsf ant-apache-bsf-0:1.7.1-9.2.fc11.x86_64 jruby-0:1.1.6-3.fc11.x86_64 xdoclet-0:1.2.3-10.4.fc11.x86_64 bsh-0:1.3.0-14.fc11.x86_64 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From overholt at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 16:30:54 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:30:54 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] bsf-jython In-Reply-To: <1252427110.3970.25.camel@choeger5.umpa.netz> References: <1252323692.2540.5.camel@choeger6> <20090908122608.GA2829@redhat.com> <1252425020.2386.2.camel@choeger5.umpa.netz> <20090908155044.GF2829@redhat.com> <1252427110.3970.25.camel@choeger5.umpa.netz> Message-ID: <20090908163052.GG2829@redhat.com> * Christoph H?ger [2009-09-08 12:25]: > Somehow I cannot find ant-apache-bsf in the packagedb. It's probably a sub-package of ant. Andrew From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Tue Sep 8 21:03:52 2009 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:03:52 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Eclipse RCP Development Message-ID: <9497e9990909081403i4d34cdcbh1f427cb1395d176c@mail.gmail.com> Hi folks, I have the latest Rawhide eclipse-rcp and eclipse-pde and installed, and when I choose File->New->Target Definition and then select the "Base RCP with Source" template, the target definition editor tells me it cannot find the org.eclipse.rcp.source feature. Is some kind of eclipse-rcp-sdk package forthcoming? Or is this is a bug and the source feature is expected to be present or maybe should that template not be available? Regards, Mat -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? From overholt at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 21:14:52 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:14:52 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Eclipse RCP Development In-Reply-To: <9497e9990909081403i4d34cdcbh1f427cb1395d176c@mail.gmail.com> References: <9497e9990909081403i4d34cdcbh1f427cb1395d176c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090908211452.GA18617@redhat.com> Hi Mat, * Mat Booth [2009-09-08 17:04]: > > I have the latest Rawhide eclipse-rcp and eclipse-pde and installed, > and when I choose File->New->Target Definition and then select the > "Base RCP with Source" template, the target definition editor tells me > it cannot find the org.eclipse.rcp.source feature. Sounds like a bug to me. Please file one and we can track it there. I get the same thing as you, FWIW. The .source features should be owned by eclipse-pde. I see other source features so it's obviously something wrong with the way the RCP source feature is packaged. Thanks, Andrew From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Tue Sep 8 21:38:44 2009 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:38:44 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Eclipse RCP Development In-Reply-To: <20090908211452.GA18617@redhat.com> References: <9497e9990909081403i4d34cdcbh1f427cb1395d176c@mail.gmail.com> <20090908211452.GA18617@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9497e9990909081438q496b788dx2d9f31b539491fb@mail.gmail.com> 2009/9/8 Andrew Overholt : > Hi Mat, > > * Mat Booth [2009-09-08 17:04]: >> >> I have the latest Rawhide eclipse-rcp and eclipse-pde and installed, >> and when I choose File->New->Target Definition and then select the >> "Base RCP with Source" template, the target definition editor tells me >> it cannot find the org.eclipse.rcp.source feature. > > Sounds like a bug to me. ?Please file one and we can track it there. ?I > get the same thing as you, FWIW. ?The .source features should be owned > by eclipse-pde. ?I see other source features so it's obviously something > wrong with the way the RCP source feature is packaged. > > Thanks, > > Andrew > Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521969 Thanks -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? From mefoster at gmail.com Wed Sep 9 14:14:14 2009 From: mefoster at gmail.com (Mary Ellen Foster) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:14:14 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide Message-ID: Is this a known issue? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522117 As far as I can tell, Subclipse *should* work properly with Eclipse 3.5: http://markphip.blogspot.com/2009/06/subclipse-and-eclipse-35galileo.html Suggestions welcome, MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster -- http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. From overholt at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:23:26 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:23:26 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> > Is this a known issue? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522117 It works for me. Are you using javahl or svnkit? Andrew From mefoster at gmail.com Wed Sep 9 14:27:13 2009 From: mefoster at gmail.com (Mary Ellen Foster) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:27:13 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> Message-ID: 2009/9/9 Andrew Overholt : >> Is this a known issue? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522117 > > It works for me. ?Are you using javahl or svnkit? Well, neither -- there isn't even a "SVN" menu item under "Team" in the configuration dialogue so I can't even choose one or the other. :( May be related to this, although there's no apparent solution given beyond "reinstall": http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=963 MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster -- http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. From overholt at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:41:12 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:41:12 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> * Mary Ellen Foster [2009-09-09 10:27]: > 2009/9/9 Andrew Overholt : > >> Is this a known issue? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522117 > > > > It works for me. ?Are you using javahl or svnkit? > > Well, neither -- there isn't even a "SVN" menu item under "Team" in > the configuration dialogue so I can't even choose one or the other. :( Do you have subversion-javahl and svnkit installed? What versions are they? I have: $ rpm -q eclipse-{subclipse,svnkit} subversion-javahl eclipse-subclipse-1.6.4-1.fc12 eclipse-svnkit-1.2.3-1.fc11 subversion-javahl-1.6.4-2.fc11 Andrew From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Wed Sep 9 14:47:20 2009 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:47:20 +0000 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9497e9990909090747web88844t276847dc4bc083a7@mail.gmail.com> 2009/9/9 Mary Ellen Foster : > 2009/9/9 Andrew Overholt : >>> Is this a known issue? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522117 >> >> It works for me. ?Are you using javahl or svnkit? > > Well, neither -- there isn't even a "SVN" menu ?item under "Team" in > the configuration dialogue so I can't even choose one or the other. :( > > May be related to this, although there's no apparent solution given > beyond "reinstall": > ? ?http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=963 > > MEF > Occasionally an eclipse -clean has fixed this for me with other plugins I've installed or updated that did not appear to start. -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? From mefoster at gmail.com Wed Sep 9 14:48:21 2009 From: mefoster at gmail.com (Mary Ellen Foster) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:48:21 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> Message-ID: 2009/9/9 Andrew Overholt : > Do you have subversion-javahl and svnkit installed? ?What versions are > they? ?I have: > > $ rpm -q eclipse-{subclipse,svnkit} subversion-javahl > eclipse-subclipse-1.6.4-1.fc12 > eclipse-svnkit-1.2.3-1.fc11 > subversion-javahl-1.6.4-2.fc11 Yes -- newer versions though: - eclipse-subclipse-1.6.5-1.fc12 - eclipse-svnkit-1.3.0-1.fc12 - subversion-javahl-1.6.5-1.fc12 The changelogs only say that those are updates to new upstream versions and don't mention anything else of interest. (and "eclipse -clean" doesn't seem to change anything although I'll try again ...) MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster -- http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. From overholt at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:53:26 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:53:26 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090909145326.GF10047@redhat.com> One possible cause is that the plugins/features don't actually install properly. One could verify this by building the package locally and attempting to install it using the update manager using the local build location as a repository. Andrew From loganjerry at gmail.com Thu Sep 10 16:27:52 2009 From: loganjerry at gmail.com (Jerry James) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:27:52 -0600 Subject: [fedora-java] jakarta-commons-lang 2.4 Message-ID: <870180fe0909100927j30748297p9794bff26d8b67ab@mail.gmail.com> I maintain findbugs, whose latest version needs jakarta-commons-lang 2.4. We currently ship 2.3. The upstream release notes [1][2] claim that 2.4 has no incompatibilities with 2.3. On the other hand, I see that jpackage (5.0) has both a jakarta-commons-lang (version 2.3) package and a jakarta-commons-lang24 package, but I don't know why. According to repoquery, these packages currently require jakarta-commons-lang: directory-naming eclipse-mylyn findbugs jakarta-commons-cli jakarta-commons-configuration jeuclid maven2 maven2-plugin-changes maven2-plugin-enforcer maven2-plugin-gpg maven2-plugin-jar maven2-plugin-javadoc openoffice.org-wiki-publisher plexus-registry Do the maintainers of any of these packages have any reason why jakarta-commons-lang should not be upgraded from 2.3 to 2.4? References: [1] http://commons.apache.org/lang/upgradeto2_4.html [2] http://commons.apache.org/lang/article2_4.html -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ From overholt at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 16:57:15 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:57:15 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] jakarta-commons-lang 2.4 In-Reply-To: <870180fe0909100927j30748297p9794bff26d8b67ab@mail.gmail.com> References: <870180fe0909100927j30748297p9794bff26d8b67ab@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090910165715.GE2635@redhat.com> * Jerry James [2009-09-10 12:28]: > eclipse-mylyn > > [...] > > Do the maintainers of any of these packages have any reason why > jakarta-commons-lang should not be upgraded from 2.3 to 2.4? I can enquire with upstream but I'm inclined to just see if it works :) There were a lot of maven packages in there. We just finished a big upgrade to 2.0.8. I'd hate to see that broken by this but if we can patch or easily move to 2.0.9 (crazy) for F-12, I'm cool with that. Andrew From akurtako at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:15:20 2009 From: akurtako at redhat.com (Alexander Kurtakov) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:15:20 +0300 Subject: [fedora-java] jakarta-commons-lang 2.4 In-Reply-To: <870180fe0909100927j30748297p9794bff26d8b67ab@mail.gmail.com> References: <870180fe0909100927j30748297p9794bff26d8b67ab@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200909102015.20960.akurtako@redhat.com> > I maintain findbugs, whose latest version needs jakarta-commons-lang > 2.4. We currently ship 2.3. The upstream release notes [1][2] claim > that 2.4 has no incompatibilities with 2.3. On the other hand, I see > that jpackage (5.0) has both a jakarta-commons-lang (version 2.3) > package and a jakarta-commons-lang24 package, but I don't know why. > > According to repoquery, these packages currently require > jakarta-commons-lang: > > directory-naming > eclipse-mylyn > findbugs > jakarta-commons-cli > jakarta-commons-configuration > jeuclid > maven2 > maven2-plugin-changes > maven2-plugin-enforcer > maven2-plugin-gpg > maven2-plugin-jar > maven2-plugin-javadoc > openoffice.org-wiki-publisher > plexus-registry > > Do the maintainers of any of these packages have any reason why > jakarta-commons-lang should not be upgraded from 2.3 to 2.4? I really believe in apache commons developers being of the not so many Java developers that care about API :). Let's hope I'm not wrong, but if I'm I'll try to find the needed time for the fixes. According to me - Go for it. Findbugs deserve it :). Regards, Alex > > References: > [1] http://commons.apache.org/lang/upgradeto2_4.html > [2] http://commons.apache.org/lang/article2_4.html From choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de Sat Sep 12 08:20:31 2009 From: choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de (Christoph =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6ger?=) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:20:31 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] strange ant bug Message-ID: <1252743631.2469.6.camel@choeger5.umpa.netz> Hi, as mentioned earlier, I want to build bsf-2.4.0 with jython enabled. In fact I cannot due to a weird bug in ant: The buildfile has this in the root: (line numbers The problem is, that this patternset is referenced in the prepare task: But ant cannot resolve the reference here and stops with an error saying that the id 'javac.source.files' cannot be found. Please note that this bug may not have affected anyone else till now, due to the fact that in the original buildfile prepare always caused clean which in turn removed the jar file. Is that a bug or what? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From helpdavid01 at gmail.com Mon Sep 14 05:40:54 2009 From: helpdavid01 at gmail.com (sj david) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:40:54 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] Graph APIs does not work on Linux Server. Message-ID: <23e662050909132240x6baff61fk5a94eeb69c0a7856@mail.gmail.com> Hi Fedora, I need your help. I Setup the Eclipse IDE & Tomcat server on Fedora 9. I am facing following problems while enabling graphical APIs on the application: *1*. I have a running java application with JCharts on Windows which works fine with Eclipse & Tomcat server. But when I am trying to deploy the same on Fedora 9. JCharts are not able to render & I am getting the following error: : "*Gtk Warning: cannot open display*". If I disable the call to JCharts APIs, My application works fine. Can you please help me here. *2*. To overcome this issue, I move to another Chart API: JFreeCharts. I added the jar in the classpath & also added its java files in the project, but whenever I am running my application from Eclipse with Tomcat, Tomcat is not able to load this JFreeChart class files, saying : *java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError* . Please help me here. Thanks David. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robert at marcanoonline.com Mon Sep 14 06:03:05 2009 From: robert at marcanoonline.com (Robert Marcano) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:33:05 -0430 Subject: [fedora-java] Graph APIs does not work on Linux Server. In-Reply-To: <23e662050909132240x6baff61fk5a94eeb69c0a7856@mail.gmail.com> References: <23e662050909132240x6baff61fk5a94eeb69c0a7856@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AADDC99.9030509@marcanoonline.com> On 09/14/2009 01:10 AM, sj david wrote: > Hi Fedora, Hello David ... > > I Setup the Eclipse IDE & Tomcat server on Fedora 9. I am facing > following problems while enabling graphical APIs on the application: > *1*. I have a running java application with JCharts on Windows which > works fine with Eclipse & Tomcat server. But when I am trying to deploy > the same on Fedora 9. JCharts are not able to render & I am getting the > following error: > : "/*Gtk Warning: cannot open display*/". First, it is time to move from Fedora 9, it is not supported anymore :-) Now the problem could be that the Tomcat server is running under a user with no access to the display and that is the correct way to install it. JFreeChart uses a lot Java2D, that until Java 1.4 required to have access to a display (in Linux a X Server), but Sun introduced a in 1.4 the System property java.awt.headless that make it possible to use Java2D and many other graphic related classes/methods. You need to add the argument -Djava.awt.headless=true to the script that start Tomcat, when calling the java executable > If I disable the call to JCharts APIs, My application works fine. Can > you please help me here. > > *2*. To overcome this issue, I move to another Chart API: JFreeCharts. I > added the jar in the classpath & also added its java files in the > project, but whenever I am running my application from Eclipse with > Tomcat, Tomcat is not able to load this JFreeChart class files, saying : > > *java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError* > > . Please help me here. > > > Thanks > David. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Mon Sep 14 09:25:05 2009 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:25:05 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9497e9990909140225q166fa8d4m36b644ac9a506ff@mail.gmail.com> 2009/9/9 Mary Ellen Foster : > 2009/9/9 Andrew Overholt : >> Do you have subversion-javahl and svnkit installed? ?What versions are >> they? ?I have: >> >> $ rpm -q eclipse-{subclipse,svnkit} subversion-javahl >> eclipse-subclipse-1.6.4-1.fc12 >> eclipse-svnkit-1.2.3-1.fc11 >> subversion-javahl-1.6.4-2.fc11 > > Yes -- newer versions though: > - eclipse-subclipse-1.6.5-1.fc12 > - eclipse-svnkit-1.3.0-1.fc12 > - subversion-javahl-1.6.5-1.fc12 > > The changelogs only say that those are updates to new upstream > versions and don't mention anything else of interest. > > (and "eclipse -clean" doesn't seem to change anything although I'll > try again ...) > > MEF > Did you find a workaround for this, Mary? I upgraded one of my boxes to Rawhide and see the same problem. -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Mon Sep 14 10:17:01 2009 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:17:01 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: <9497e9990909140225q166fa8d4m36b644ac9a506ff@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> <9497e9990909140225q166fa8d4m36b644ac9a506ff@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9497e9990909140317x1077b541m9347ec695064274d@mail.gmail.com> 2009/9/14 Mat Booth : > 2009/9/9 Mary Ellen Foster : >> 2009/9/9 Andrew Overholt : >>> Do you have subversion-javahl and svnkit installed? ?What versions are >>> they? ?I have: >>> >>> $ rpm -q eclipse-{subclipse,svnkit} subversion-javahl >>> eclipse-subclipse-1.6.4-1.fc12 >>> eclipse-svnkit-1.2.3-1.fc11 >>> subversion-javahl-1.6.4-2.fc11 >> >> Yes -- newer versions though: >> - eclipse-subclipse-1.6.5-1.fc12 >> - eclipse-svnkit-1.3.0-1.fc12 >> - subversion-javahl-1.6.5-1.fc12 >> >> The changelogs only say that those are updates to new upstream >> versions and don't mention anything else of interest. >> >> (and "eclipse -clean" doesn't seem to change anything although I'll >> try again ...) >> >> MEF >> > > Did you find a workaround for this, Mary? > > I upgraded one of my boxes to Rawhide and see the same problem. > > Eclipse is only loading the JDT and SDK features for me. Funnily enough, these are the only plugins in /usr/*lib*/eclipse/dropins whereas all the other plugins are installing to /usr/*share*/eclipse/dropins. None of the plugins in /usr/share/eclipse/dropins seem to be loaded at all. If you symlink the plugins in /usr/share to /usr/lib like this: $ sudo ln -s /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/gef /usr/lib/eclipse/dropins Then Eclipse does a cartoon double-take and realises that there are plugins installed after all. So, it seems like Eclipse is not looking in /usr/share/eclipse/dropins. Is that the case, Andrew? -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? From overholt at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 12:48:35 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:48:35 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: <9497e9990909140317x1077b541m9347ec695064274d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> <9497e9990909140225q166fa8d4m36b644ac9a506ff@mail.gmail.com> <9497e9990909140317x1077b541m9347ec695064274d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090914124835.GA3138@redhat.com> * Mat Booth [2009-09-14 06:17]: > So, it seems like Eclipse is not looking in > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins. Is that the case, Andrew? It should be. I don't know what changed here. I still think it's one feature/plugin in /usr/share/eclipse/dropins that isn't being installed properly and that's kill all things in that location. It would help if we could try installing each one individually with the update manager so we can see if there are issues. Yes, it would be nice if dropins had diagnosis. Yes, it would be nice if our OSGi->RPM stuff was enabled. Andrew From helpdavid01 at gmail.com Mon Sep 14 17:15:35 2009 From: helpdavid01 at gmail.com (sj david) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:15:35 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] Graph APIs does not work on Linux Server. In-Reply-To: <4AADDC99.9030509@marcanoonline.com> References: <23e662050909132240x6baff61fk5a94eeb69c0a7856@mail.gmail.com> <4AADDC99.9030509@marcanoonline.com> Message-ID: <23e662050909141015k4edf43efn2f53fc7c67ddcbcb@mail.gmail.com> Hi Robert, Thank you very much for the information. Just want to dig more. I am using Java 6.0 & Tomcat 5. - For JChart: How I can give access to display (X Server) to Tomcat server. - REgd JFreeChart: In which file in need to add -Djava.awt.headless=true ? I already did that in tomcat5.conf. And also I setup the same in the code before calling the JFreeChart API (System.properties("java.awt.headless","true")) Appreciate your help !!!! Thanks again, David On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 09/14/2009 01:10 AM, sj david wrote: > >> Hi Fedora, >> > > Hello David > ... > >> >> I Setup the Eclipse IDE & Tomcat server on Fedora 9. I am facing >> following problems while enabling graphical APIs on the application: >> *1*. I have a running java application with JCharts on Windows which >> works fine with Eclipse & Tomcat server. But when I am trying to deploy >> the same on Fedora 9. JCharts are not able to render & I am getting the >> following error: >> : "/*Gtk Warning: cannot open display*/". >> > > First, it is time to move from Fedora 9, it is not supported anymore :-) > > Now the problem could be that the Tomcat server is running under a user > with no access to the display and that is the correct way to install it. > JFreeChart uses a lot Java2D, that until Java 1.4 required to have access to > a display (in Linux a X Server), but Sun introduced a in 1.4 the System > property java.awt.headless that make it possible to use Java2D and many > other graphic related classes/methods. > > You need to add the argument -Djava.awt.headless=true to the script that > start Tomcat, when calling the java executable > > If I disable the call to JCharts APIs, My application works fine. Can >> you please help me here. >> >> *2*. To overcome this issue, I move to another Chart API: JFreeCharts. I >> added the jar in the classpath & also added its java files in the >> project, but whenever I am running my application from Eclipse with >> Tomcat, Tomcat is not able to load this JFreeChart class files, saying : >> >> *java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError* >> >> . Please help me here. >> >> >> Thanks >> David. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> -- >> fedora-devel-java-list mailing list >> fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list >> > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mefoster at gmail.com Tue Sep 15 15:51:17 2009 From: mefoster at gmail.com (Mary Ellen Foster) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:51:17 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090914124835.GA3138@redhat.com> References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> <9497e9990909140225q166fa8d4m36b644ac9a506ff@mail.gmail.com> <9497e9990909140317x1077b541m9347ec695064274d@mail.gmail.com> <20090914124835.GA3138@redhat.com> Message-ID: 2009/9/14 Andrew Overholt : > * Mat Booth [2009-09-14 06:17]: >> So, it seems like Eclipse is not looking in >> /usr/share/eclipse/dropins. Is that the case, Andrew? > > It should be. ?I don't know what changed here. ?I still think it's one > feature/plugin in /usr/share/eclipse/dropins that isn't being installed > properly and that's kill all things in that location. ?It would help if > we could try installing each one individually with the update manager so > we can see if there are issues. > > Yes, it would be nice if dropins had diagnosis. > Yes, it would be nice if our OSGi->RPM stuff was enabled. NB: There seems to be a sort of similar breakage right now in F11 with the latest updates -- I don't even see JDT or anything at the moment! Eek! :) MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster -- http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. From overholt at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 15:53:08 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:53:08 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> <9497e9990909140225q166fa8d4m36b644ac9a506ff@mail.gmail.com> <9497e9990909140317x1077b541m9347ec695064274d@mail.gmail.com> <20090914124835.GA3138@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090915155308.GC8811@redhat.com> * Mary Ellen Foster [2009-09-15 11:51]: > 2009/9/14 Andrew Overholt : > > * Mat Booth [2009-09-14 06:17]: > >> So, it seems like Eclipse is not looking in > >> /usr/share/eclipse/dropins. Is that the case, Andrew? > > > > It should be. ?I don't know what changed here. ?I still think it's one > > feature/plugin in /usr/share/eclipse/dropins that isn't being installed > > properly and that's kill all things in that location. ?It would help if > > we could try installing each one individually with the update manager so > > we can see if there are issues. > > > > Yes, it would be nice if dropins had diagnosis. > > Yes, it would be nice if our OSGi->RPM stuff was enabled. > > NB: There seems to be a sort of similar breakage right now in F11 with > the latest updates -- I don't even see JDT or anything at the moment! This is the classic 3.4 problem. Try -clean or moving ~/.eclipse out of the way. Thankfully F-12 is right around the corner with 3.5. Andrew From mefoster at gmail.com Tue Sep 15 15:56:56 2009 From: mefoster at gmail.com (Mary Ellen Foster) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:56:56 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090915155308.GC8811@redhat.com> References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> <9497e9990909140225q166fa8d4m36b644ac9a506ff@mail.gmail.com> <9497e9990909140317x1077b541m9347ec695064274d@mail.gmail.com> <20090914124835.GA3138@redhat.com> <20090915155308.GC8811@redhat.com> Message-ID: 2009/9/15 Andrew Overholt : > * Mary Ellen Foster [2009-09-15 11:51]: >> NB: There seems to be a sort of similar breakage right now in F11 with >> the latest updates -- I don't even see JDT or anything at the moment! > > This is the classic 3.4 problem. ?Try -clean or moving ~/.eclipse out of > the way. ?Thankfully F-12 is right around the corner with 3.5. *whew*, thanks -- that was scary! :) For what it's worth, -clean didn't help at all, but moving .eclipse did. MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster -- http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. From overholt at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 15:59:28 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:59:28 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Subclipse doesn't seem to work on Rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090915155308.GC8811@redhat.com> References: <20090909142325.GC10047@redhat.com> <20090909144112.GD10047@redhat.com> <9497e9990909140225q166fa8d4m36b644ac9a506ff@mail.gmail.com> <9497e9990909140317x1077b541m9347ec695064274d@mail.gmail.com> <20090914124835.GA3138@redhat.com> <20090915155308.GC8811@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090915155928.GD8811@redhat.com> * Andrew Overholt [2009-09-15 11:54]: > This is the classic 3.4 problem. I should probably point out that we've done very few if any updates ourselves but having SWT's mozilla libraries linked against the XULRunner unstable libraries means that we get bumped every time they do :( Andrew From loganjerry at gmail.com Tue Sep 15 20:17:47 2009 From: loganjerry at gmail.com (Jerry James) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:17:47 -0600 Subject: [fedora-java] commons-parent.pom Message-ID: <870180fe0909151317q4c0f27ecw524bd7c63364eebb@mail.gmail.com> With the encouragement of a couple of people on the list, I'm working on updating the jakarta-commons-lang package to version 2.4. Some elements of the spec file that are currently present to work around problems can now be done away with, which is great news. Kudos to everybody who worked so hard on the recent maven update. I attempted to enable the maven build of jakarta-commons-lang, instead of using ant. The maven build is failing, because of a missing org.apache.commons:commons-parent POM. This POM is already referred to by the jakarta-common-io POM, which means that mvn-jpp builds of any projects using jakarta-common-io are going to fail. (Jakarta-commons-io is built with ant also, which probably hid this issue from the maintainer.) Does anybody know what should be providing that POM? Repoquery shows that it is not present in Fedora. If I'm reading the repo data correctly, it looks like jpackage includes this POM in maven2-common-poms. One last question: since upstream dropped the "jakarta", are we planning to follow suit? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ From akurtako at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 20:37:20 2009 From: akurtako at redhat.com (Alexander Kurtakov) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:37:20 +0300 Subject: [fedora-java] commons-parent.pom In-Reply-To: <870180fe0909151317q4c0f27ecw524bd7c63364eebb@mail.gmail.com> References: <870180fe0909151317q4c0f27ecw524bd7c63364eebb@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200909152337.20680.akurtako@redhat.com> > With the encouragement of a couple of people on the list, I'm working > on updating the jakarta-commons-lang package to version 2.4. Some > elements of the spec file that are currently present to work around > problems can now be done away with, which is great news. Kudos to > everybody who worked so hard on the recent maven update. > > I attempted to enable the maven build of jakarta-commons-lang, instead > of using ant. The maven build is failing, because of a missing > org.apache.commons:commons-parent POM. This POM is already referred > to by the jakarta-common-io POM, which means that mvn-jpp builds of > any projects using jakarta-common-io are going to fail. > (Jakarta-commons-io is built with ant also, which probably hid this > issue from the maintainer.) > > Does anybody know what should be providing that POM? Repoquery shows > that it is not present in Fedora. > > If I'm reading the repo data correctly, it looks like jpackage > includes this POM in maven2-common-poms. Yes, it should be in maven2-common-poms. I'll add it tomorrow. Look out for newer maven2-common-poms package :). > > One last question: since upstream dropped the "jakarta", are we > planning to follow suit? I think we *have* to. But it can be done whenever the maintainer finds the time to do it. > Regards, Alex From loganjerry at gmail.com Tue Sep 15 20:53:54 2009 From: loganjerry at gmail.com (Jerry James) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:53:54 -0600 Subject: [fedora-java] commons-parent.pom In-Reply-To: <200909152337.20680.akurtako@redhat.com> References: <870180fe0909151317q4c0f27ecw524bd7c63364eebb@mail.gmail.com> <200909152337.20680.akurtako@redhat.com> Message-ID: <870180fe0909151353v4714303bm456a2de7e50bad89@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > Yes, it should be in maven2-common-poms. I'll add it tomorrow. Look out for > newer maven2-common-poms package :). Thanks, Alex. I appreciate the quick response. >> One last question: since upstream dropped the "jakarta", are we >> planning to follow suit? > > I think we *have* to. But it can be done whenever the maintainer finds the time > to do it. Hmmm. Wouldn't it be better to do them all in one fell swoop so we can get the pain over with? Probably for F-13, where we're so close to F-12. -- Jerry James, who resisted the temptation to write "swell foop" http://www.jamezone.org/ From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Tue Sep 15 22:20:59 2009 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:20:59 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] commons-parent.pom In-Reply-To: <870180fe0909151317q4c0f27ecw524bd7c63364eebb@mail.gmail.com> References: <870180fe0909151317q4c0f27ecw524bd7c63364eebb@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9497e9990909151520m3a7fda27m5ccc593eb9fbc3fc@mail.gmail.com> 2009/9/15 Jerry James : > With the encouragement of a couple of people on the list, I'm working > on updating the jakarta-commons-lang package to version 2.4. ?Some > elements of the spec file that are currently present to work around > problems can now be done away with, which is great news. ?Kudos to > everybody who worked so hard on the recent maven update. > > I attempted to enable the maven build of jakarta-commons-lang, instead > of using ant. ?The maven build is failing, because of a missing > org.apache.commons:commons-parent POM. ?This POM is already referred > to by the jakarta-common-io POM, which means that mvn-jpp builds of > any projects using jakarta-common-io are going to fail. > (Jakarta-commons-io is built with ant also, which probably hid this > issue from the maintainer.) > > Does anybody know what should be providing that POM? ?Repoquery shows > that it is not present in Fedora. > > If I'm reading the repo data correctly, it looks like jpackage > includes this POM in maven2-common-poms. > There is a bug open for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520001 -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? From overholt at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 13:08:33 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:08:33 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] commons-parent.pom In-Reply-To: <870180fe0909151353v4714303bm456a2de7e50bad89@mail.gmail.com> References: <870180fe0909151317q4c0f27ecw524bd7c63364eebb@mail.gmail.com> <200909152337.20680.akurtako@redhat.com> <870180fe0909151353v4714303bm456a2de7e50bad89@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090916130832.GB2622@redhat.com> * Jerry James [2009-09-15 16:54]: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > > >> One last question: since upstream dropped the "jakarta", are we > >> planning to follow suit? > > > > I think we *have* to. But it can be done whenever the maintainer finds the time > > to do it. > > Hmmm. Wouldn't it be better to do them all in one fell swoop so we > can get the pain over with? Probably for F-13, where we're so close > to F-12. I agree it would be nice to do them all at once but think it would be hard to coordinate. Unless we built them all in a koji tag and then moved them all over once we were satisfied? Andrew From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Wed Sep 16 14:23:01 2009 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:23:01 +0000 Subject: [fedora-java] commons-parent.pom In-Reply-To: <20090916130832.GB2622@redhat.com> References: <870180fe0909151317q4c0f27ecw524bd7c63364eebb@mail.gmail.com> <200909152337.20680.akurtako@redhat.com> <870180fe0909151353v4714303bm456a2de7e50bad89@mail.gmail.com> <20090916130832.GB2622@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9497e9990909160723w67701c67v65add697e09d8cd@mail.gmail.com> 2009/9/16 Andrew Overholt : > * Jerry James [2009-09-15 16:54]: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: >> >> >> One last question: since upstream dropped the "jakarta", are we >> >> planning to follow suit? >> > >> > I think we *have* to. But it can be done whenever the maintainer finds the time >> > to do it. >> >> Hmmm. ?Wouldn't it be better to do them all in one fell swoop so we >> can get the pain over with? ?Probably for F-13, where we're so close >> to F-12. > > I agree it would be nice to do them all at once but think it would be > hard to coordinate. ?Unless we built them all in a koji tag and then > moved them all over once we were satisfied? > > Andrew > Does this work want doing at jpackage, or is it ok to diverge from jpackage these days? -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? From dant at cdkkt.com Sat Sep 19 01:13:55 2009 From: dant at cdkkt.com (Daniel B. Thurman) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:13:55 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] F11: Fedora's Netbeans, Eclipse, and Tomcat. Message-ID: <4AB43053.5060603@cdkkt.com> >From what I can tell, there is no possible way to run Fedora's implementation of Netbeans and Eclipse against Fedora's implementation of Tomcat 5 & 6. Tomcat5 is structurally different, almost completely "rearranged" and tomcat6 has missing pieces that could not be found, or so the error messages say. I have tried everything I could and could not get it to work. If one were to download Netbeans/Eclipse directly from the vendors, it will not work against Fedora's Tomcat implementations but works against Apache's Tomcat versions, or so it seems. Has anyone ever gotten Fedora's implementation to work "natively"? I have gotten NB/EC to work just fine on F9, however, I had to "tweak" Fedora's implementations of T5/6 to get it to work, and also installed Apache's versions as well, but it works. No dice w/ F11 - it's just too different/difficult to fiddle with. I assume that F10 is similar to F11, but I cannot vouch for that since I haven't tried it. I note that a "fully installed" F11 has heavy tomcat5 dependencies that attempting to remove T5, results in some 100+ packages. Oye. FWIW, Dan From helpdavid01 at gmail.com Sat Sep 19 20:50:01 2009 From: helpdavid01 at gmail.com (sj david) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:50:01 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] Tomcat Plugin for Fedora Eclipse 3.3.2 - Unable to run Tomcat from Eclipse Message-ID: <23e662050909191350p77fee239p9d609fea2bbe037e@mail.gmail.com> Hi Fedora, I have installed Fedora Eclipse 3.3.2 with Tomcat 5.5 on the Fedora 9 server. I also added the tomcat plugin in the Eclipse plugin folder. But still unable to run the tomcat from Eclipse. Whenever I m clicking on 'Start Tomcat' icon, nothing is happening. Tomcat is running fine from 'Service Configuration'. Can you please help to know what I am missing & what else I have to do to fix this issue. I want to launch Tomcat 5.5 from eclipse. Thanks David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From overholt at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:40:56 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:40:56 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Tomcat Plugin for Fedora Eclipse 3.3.2 - Unable to run Tomcat from Eclipse In-Reply-To: <23e662050909191350p77fee239p9d609fea2bbe037e@mail.gmail.com> References: <23e662050909191350p77fee239p9d609fea2bbe037e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090921124055.GA2649@redhat.com> Hi, * sj david [2009-09-19 16:50]: > I also added the tomcat plugin in the Eclipse plugin folder. What is this "tomcat plugin"? > Whenever I m clicking on 'Start Tomcat' icon, nothing is happening. > Tomcat is running fine from 'Service Configuration'. If I had to bet, I'd say this plugin expects some sort of tomcat file layout or location that is different from the Fedora tomcat layout. But I really don't know. Also, Fedora 9 is no longer supported :) . Andrew From overholt at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:42:24 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:42:24 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: F11: Fedora's Netbeans, Eclipse, and Tomcat. In-Reply-To: <4AB43053.5060603@cdkkt.com> References: <4AB43053.5060603@cdkkt.com> Message-ID: <20090921124224.GB2649@redhat.com> Hi Dan, > Tomcat5 is structurally different, almost completely > "rearranged" and tomcat6 has missing pieces that > could not be found, or so the error messages say. I suggest you file a bug with the tomcat package in Fedora. This package originated at JPackage so you may want to discuss with them. Andrew From ricardo at fedoraproject.org Tue Sep 22 19:40:05 2009 From: ricardo at fedoraproject.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Ricardo_Arg=C3=BCello?=) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:40:05 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] JBoss Packaging in Fedora Message-ID: <500f0ca00909221240l5c65b55coe63a0dfa9e6a71d7@mail.gmail.com> I would like to help package JBoss for Fedora. Maybe we could add this as a Feature for Fedora 13. Anybody else interested in helping out? I think there was a previous effort, but I'm not sure if they managed to pack the lot of dependencies needed. The JPackage project managed to package JBoss 4.2.3 for Fedora 10. We could use those RPMs to start, but maybe we should package JBoss 5.x instead. How can we work together on this? References: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss_packaging_effort https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss_packaging_effort/Dependencies -- Ricardo Arg?ello, RHCE Fedora Ambassador - Ecuador From robert at marcanoonline.com Tue Sep 22 20:18:41 2009 From: robert at marcanoonline.com (Robert Marcano) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:48:41 -0430 Subject: [fedora-java] JBoss Packaging in Fedora In-Reply-To: <500f0ca00909221240l5c65b55coe63a0dfa9e6a71d7@mail.gmail.com> References: <500f0ca00909221240l5c65b55coe63a0dfa9e6a71d7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AB93121.701@marcanoonline.com> On 09/22/2009 03:10 PM, Ricardo Arg?ello wrote: > I would like to help package JBoss for Fedora. Maybe we could add this > as a Feature for Fedora 13. > Hola Ricardo, I can join the effort. I already have a extremely custom (patches and configuration changes) JBoss 4.2 RPM for internal use. It is not to the level of Fedora packaging standards, but I think the experience packaging it is helpful, even if the 5.x codebase is different > Anybody else interested in helping out? I think there was a previous > effort, but I'm not sure if they managed to pack the lot of > dependencies needed. > Yes, I think we should start with JBoss 5.x too > The JPackage project managed to package JBoss 4.2.3 for Fedora 10. We > could use those RPMs to start, but maybe we should package JBoss 5.x > instead. > > How can we work together on this? My workflow when I package something Java related with a lot of dependencies is that I start at the top level and not thinking too much about the dependencies. In this case I will start packaging JBoss as-is (before adding it to Fedora repositories), it means using the already build dependencies from the public maven repositories or bundled in the source tar, and then replacing one by one with the required links to Fedora packages one by one, adding what is needed to be added to Fedora or requesting upgrades to the packages needed > > References: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss_packaging_effort > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss_packaging_effort/Dependencies > From fnasser at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 21:00:01 2009 From: fnasser at redhat.com (Fernando Nasser) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:00:01 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [fedora-java] JBoss Packaging in Fedora In-Reply-To: <4AB93121.701@marcanoonline.com> Message-ID: <1636978174.90651253653201868.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> What are you guys talking about? JBoss already provides packages for our latest community JBoss AS, it is just in a separate repository (for several reasons). David, can you please repost the announcement here, Regards to all, Fernando ----- "Robert Marcano" wrote: > On 09/22/2009 03:10 PM, Ricardo Arg?ello wrote: > > I would like to help package JBoss for Fedora. Maybe we could add > this > > as a Feature for Fedora 13. > > > > Hola Ricardo, I can join the effort. I already have a extremely custom > > (patches and configuration changes) JBoss 4.2 RPM for internal use. It > > is not to the level of Fedora packaging standards, but I think the > experience packaging it is helpful, even if the 5.x codebase is > different > > > > Anybody else interested in helping out? I think there was a > previous > > effort, but I'm not sure if they managed to pack the lot of > > dependencies needed. > > > > Yes, I think we should start with JBoss 5.x too > > > The JPackage project managed to package JBoss 4.2.3 for Fedora 10. > We > > could use those RPMs to start, but maybe we should package JBoss > 5.x > > instead. > > > > How can we work together on this? > > My workflow when I package something Java related with a lot of > dependencies is that I start at the top level and not thinking too > much > about the dependencies. In this case I will start packaging JBoss > as-is > (before adding it to Fedora repositories), it means using the already > > build dependencies from the public maven repositories or bundled in > the > source tar, and then replacing one by one with the required links to > Fedora packages one by one, adding what is needed to be added to > Fedora > or requesting upgrades to the packages needed > > > > > References: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss_packaging_effort > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss_packaging_effort/Dependencies > > > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list From fnasser at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 21:00:29 2009 From: fnasser at redhat.com (Fernando Nasser) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:00:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [fedora-java] JBoss Packaging in Fedora In-Reply-To: <4AB93121.701@marcanoonline.com> Message-ID: <2048718174.91071253653229607.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> P.S.: For F-13 we are planning AS 5.2 ----- "Robert Marcano" wrote: > On 09/22/2009 03:10 PM, Ricardo Arg?ello wrote: > > I would like to help package JBoss for Fedora. Maybe we could add > this > > as a Feature for Fedora 13. > > > > Hola Ricardo, I can join the effort. I already have a extremely custom > > (patches and configuration changes) JBoss 4.2 RPM for internal use. It > > is not to the level of Fedora packaging standards, but I think the > experience packaging it is helpful, even if the 5.x codebase is > different > > > > Anybody else interested in helping out? I think there was a > previous > > effort, but I'm not sure if they managed to pack the lot of > > dependencies needed. > > > > Yes, I think we should start with JBoss 5.x too > > > The JPackage project managed to package JBoss 4.2.3 for Fedora 10. > We > > could use those RPMs to start, but maybe we should package JBoss > 5.x > > instead. > > > > How can we work together on this? > > My workflow when I package something Java related with a lot of > dependencies is that I start at the top level and not thinking too > much > about the dependencies. In this case I will start packaging JBoss > as-is > (before adding it to Fedora repositories), it means using the already > > build dependencies from the public maven repositories or bundled in > the > source tar, and then replacing one by one with the required links to > Fedora packages one by one, adding what is needed to be added to > Fedora > or requesting upgrades to the packages needed > > > > > References: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss_packaging_effort > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss_packaging_effort/Dependencies > > > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list From overholt at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 21:08:00 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:08:00 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] JBoss Packaging in Fedora In-Reply-To: <1636978174.90651253653201868.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <4AB93121.701@marcanoonline.com> <2048718174.91071253653229607.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4AB93121.701@marcanoonline.com> <1636978174.90651253653201868.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090922210800.GG2618@redhat.com> * Fernando Nasser [2009-09-22 17:00]: > What are you guys talking about? > > JBoss already provides packages for our latest community JBoss AS, it is just in a separate repository (for several reasons). They mean packaging JBoss AS and making it available as a part of the Fedora repositories. [and in a separate mail] > P.S.: For F-13 we are planning AS 5.2 _In_ Fedora? Andrew From overholt at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 21:10:24 2009 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:10:24 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] JBoss Packaging in Fedora In-Reply-To: <500f0ca00909221240l5c65b55coe63a0dfa9e6a71d7@mail.gmail.com> References: <500f0ca00909221240l5c65b55coe63a0dfa9e6a71d7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090922211024.GH2618@redhat.com> * Ricardo Arg?ello [2009-09-22 15:40]: > I would like to help package JBoss for Fedora. Maybe we could add this > as a Feature for Fedora 13. This has been a frequent request in the past and would be great to have. >From what I hear, it will not be easy. I wish you good luck, Ricard, Robert, et al. Andrew From robert at marcanoonline.com Tue Sep 22 21:18:12 2009 From: robert at marcanoonline.com (Robert Marcano) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:48:12 -0430 Subject: [fedora-java] JBoss Packaging in Fedora In-Reply-To: <1636978174.90651253653201868.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <1636978174.90651253653201868.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <4AB93F14.1070202@marcanoonline.com> On 09/22/2009 04:30 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote: > What are you guys talking about? > > JBoss already provides packages for our latest community JBoss AS, it is just in a separate repository (for several reasons). > > David, can you please repost the announcement here, > > Regards to all, > Fernando > > Can you point us to the yum/RPM repository? I am unable to find any reference to it on jboss.org site, I only found the standard zip/tar files