Python package packaging question
Michel Alexandre Salim
salimma at fastmail.fm
Tue Feb 3 04:04:45 UTC 2004
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 17:23 -0500, Toshio wrote:
[snip]
> > Some packages include the byte-compiled versions of their scripts to
> > avoid this. Personally I think all packages which include python
> > scripts should include both the .pyc and .pyo files (and that the
> > default RPM configuration should automate this), but I don't think
> > there's ever been a consensus on that.
> >
> I'd like to see consensus because I see a potential to generate some
> boilerplate code for python packaging if we can agree on what the
> standard should be.
>
A good idea that I have been musing about - thanks for the reminder.
See attachment to the Fedora.us bugzilla entry for fedora-rpmdevtools:
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1167
Regards,
Michel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040203/827b6390/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list