the fate of firewire
Michael Tiemann
tiemann at redhat.com
Mon Sep 13 13:51:34 UTC 2004
Red Hat "decided" that short innovation cycle + long support cycle are
mutually exclusive about as much as Galileo "decided" that the Earth
orbited the Sun, not the other way around. I just hope that The
Community is as forgiving about our "decision" as The Church was about
Galileo's ;-)
M
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 09:31, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
> > No, RHEL has a too long innovation cycle. What I need is something
> > like the Fedora release (innovation) cycle, together with a RHEL-like
> > support cycle.
>
> And redhat decided that these 2 items, short innovation cycle + long
> support cycle, are mutually exclusive. redhat would end up "supporting"
> 5-6 releases (going back ~3 years @ ~ 6 month innovation cycle), which
> would be unmanageable. Is that really what you want?
>
> Besides, IMO, RHEL is pretty good when it comes to innovation too. Are
> there features missing from RHEL that you need?
>
> -- Rex
>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list